Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: BUILDING DEFERRED SUBMITTAL REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0624-01123
Review Name: BUILDING DEFERRED SUBMITTAL REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/12/2026 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 02/12/2026 | External Reviewers - Stantec Express | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | February 12, 2026 1st Review Re: TUCSON HOUSE REMODEL (DEFERRED SUBMITTAL) City of Tucson Permit Number: TC-COM-0624-01123 Stantec Project Number: 185215066 Stantec File Number: TUC-26-008 Plan review for the above referenced project has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. Please cloud and delta all changes and provide a letter with a written response to each of the comments indicating the action taken. The scope of this review covers the architectural, structural, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical designs as they relate to the codes adopted by the jurisdiction. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. Occupancy Group Construction Type Area (Square feet) Occupant Load Automatic Fire Sprinklers Fire Alarms A-3 I-A 13,127 2,337 Yes Yes B I-A 13,159 S-2 I-A 27,674 R-2 I-A 317,325 Separate Permits: Automatic fire sprinklers, fire alarm, swimming pool. Deferred Submittals: None. Special Inspections: Concrete, epoxy and expansion anchors, high-strength bolts, field welding, sprayed fire-resistant materials, fire-resistant penetrations and joints (high-rises), and outdoor lighting. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS 1. There is no evidence on this structural deferred submittal that it has been reviewed by the engineer of record as required by 2018 IBC Sec. 107.3.4.1. There needs to be a shop drawing stamp on this deferred submittal indicating that the engineer of record has reviewed the document and finds that it is in conformance with the design of the building. 2. How was the quantity of FRP reinforcement determined to ensure that the additional shear capacity specified by the engineer of record is being achieved by this design? Where are the calculations that were performed to determine the necessary quantity? Should you have any questions regarding the plan review comments, please contact the plan reviewer listed for the appropriate discipline. Plans reviewed by: Joel Svoboda, RA Senior Associate 520-545-7415 joel.svoboda@stantec.com |
||
| 02/05/2026 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |