Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0525-00942
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/28/2025 | Commercial Electrical Standard | APPROVED | Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 5/21/2025 12:09:31 PM |
||
| 05/28/2025 | Commercial Mechanical Standard | APPROVED | Mechanical(M) Reviewer John Graves jgraves@mtcinspectors.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 5/21/2025 12:11:28 PM |
||
| 06/09/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 05/28/2025 | Commercial Building Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer Madeline Nelson mnelson@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 5/25/2025 10:43:34 PM 1. General / Updates: For project updates, submit sheets with all changes clearly marked in revision clouds. Please provide a written response to each comment; updates without a clear response may not be reviewed. If you have any questions regarding the comments, you may contact me directly. Updates may result in additional comments. 2. General / Special Inspection Certificate: Please have the Registered Design Professional in Responsible Charge of this project complete and return the City of Tucson Special Inspections Certificate with signatures. The form can be downloaded at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/city-services/planning-developmentservices/documents/special_inspection_certificate.pdf 3. General / Geotechnical Report: Please provide a copy of the site-specific geotechnical report for this project. The report should support the appropriateness of the selected foundation system for the project site. All submitted geotechnical reports must be dated no later than three years from the submittal date. Outdated reports must be accompanied by a letter from a qualified geotechnical engineer stating that the report requirements are still valid, or stating what items may have changed. All building code references must be updated to the current code adopted by the City. 4. Sheet S111 / Roof Framing Plan / Future Heat Pump: The Roof Framing Plan Keynote 11 refers to framing for a future heat pump to be supported on the pre-fabricated wood roof trusses. For purposes of coordination with the truss manufacturer, please indicate a maximum point load for this future unit on plan. 5. Sheets S111 & S301 / Conflicting Information: Roof Framing Plan Keynote 6 and Detail C3 on Sheet S301 provide conflicting information on fasteners connecting the wood shear wall end studs to the adjacent HSS steel column. Because the steel column's anchor bolts are acting as hold downs at these locations, please confirm the fasteners necessary to transfer overturning forces from the wood shear walls to the HSS columns. Revise drawings to be consistent. 6. Sheet S201 / Detail C5 / Maximum Height for Light Poles: The Engineer of Record has provided a foundation detail for proposed light poles on the property. Because light poles are being specified by another discipline, it is recommended that the EOR indicate a maximum allowable height for which the foundation has been designed. Building(B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 5/16/2025 4:35:53 PM 1. Sheet G003/Occupant Load: The occupant load calculation is incorrect. The waiting room has not been accounted for in the calculation. There is a distinct difference between occupancy classification and occupancy use. The exceptions provided in Section 303.1.2 apply to that of classification and the requirements of max. allowable area, height, stories, mix-use requirements and overall classification of the building. So yes, this room is considered as business in the overall context of the structure and can comply with the business requirements previously mentioned. However, when calculating occupant loads, one must calculate based on the use of the space. The waiting room's use is assembly, and the occupant load must be calculated as such. Provide a space-by-space corrected occupant load calculation. (2018 IBC Section 1004.3 and Table 1004.5) |
||
| 05/28/2025 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 5/26/2025 2:10:05 PM FIRST PLUMBING REVIEW: 1). PLAN PAGE P103 NOTE #7: VACUUM EXHAUST NOTE #7 DISTANCES ARE INCORRECT. VACUUM NOTE #7 DISTANCES NEED TO BE 25FT FROM ANY OPENINING OR INTAKE -2018 NFPA99 5.1.3.7.7.2 2). PLAN PAGE P001 OR P103: MISSING MED GAS , AIR, & VACUUM PIPING MATERIALS. ADD MED GAS, AIR & VACUUM PIPING MATERIALS TO THE PLANS. -2018 NFPA 99 3). PLAN PAGE P103: PIPING ILLUSTRATIONS MISSING PIPING SIZES. ADD PIPING SIZES TO THE PIPING ILLUSTRATIONS. -2018 IPC 106.3.1 4). GENERAL: NEED TO ADDRESS BUILDING PLAN REVIEW COMMENT 1 -2018 IPC 403.1 |
||
| 05/22/2025 | Outdoor Lighting Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Outdoor Lighting Review TC-COM-0525-00942 (10080 E OLD VAIL RD TUCSON, AZ 85747) Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. Provide updated Plans/calculations and a written response Letter to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Resubmitted plans that do not contain a written response Letter addressing each of the notated items indicating action taken, may be delayed until response letter is received. Code reference, 2018 International Building Code (IBC), 2017 National Electrical Code (NEC), 2012 Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC). Outdoor Lighting Review: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/building-code/2012_outdoor_lighting_code_.pdf 1. Provide an outdoor lighting plan that meets the requirements of OLC 104.2. Show/locate the different light sources on your site plan. Number the light fixtures on your table and use the same number on your site plan. 2. List the Lighting Area per OLC chapter 3 and used in Table 401.1. Specify the compliance option from Table 401.1 that is being used. Total outdoor light output shall not exceed the lumen limits listed in Table 401.1. 3. Show compliance with City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code with an approved lighting calculation in accordance with OLC 104.2.1, 401.2. Include all exterior fixtures on the property in the calculations. List shielded and unshielded lights in the calculation. Show unshielded fixtures with a maximum of 3,000 lumens, OLC 401.4. Show lamps with a maximum of 3500K color temperature, OLC 402.1. 4. Fixtures installed under canopies and overhangs. Outdoor lighting fixtures shall not be counted in determining the total light output when they are full cutoff light fixtures installed under canopies, building overhangs, or roof eaves, OLC 401.2.1(3). 5. Indicate whether or not a special inspection is required per sec. 104.2.2, and 106.2. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/city-services/planning-development-services/documents/special_inspection_certificate_odl.pdf 6. Specify any exceptions used. 7. Provide Curfew lighting controls If applicable Per section 403. Contact Jeremy Hamblin with any questions: Jeremy.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/09/2025 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TC-COM-0525-00942 10080 E OLD VAIL RD Site Engineering comments are as follows: 1. The development package, TD-DEV- 0325-00077, must be approved by all reviewers prior to the approval of this commercial building permit. UDC Article 3.3.3.7.a Ryan Insalaco – ryan.insalaco@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/04/2025 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-COM-0525-00942 - TD-DEV-0325-00077 10080 E. Old Vail Rd. – PAD-36 Medical Service Outpatient (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL: June 4, 2025 This site is located in PAD-36 (UDC 4.7.24). Automotive: Minor Service and Repair is an allowed use in the PAD. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with development package TD-DEV-0325-00077, The following comments need to be addressed. 2. The gross floor area listed under Classification/General Building Limitations on sheet 3, does not match what is shown on the CP. 3. Zoning is not able to approve the building plan until the DP is approved by all review agencies. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 06/05/2025 | Water - PDSD Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to the building, building sewer, etc.). Provide a site plan showing the installation of the water service to the building and the installation of the building sewer. Reference: Sections 107.2.1 and 107.2.6, IBC 2018. 2. Provide calculations that show that the proposed 1-1/2” water meter is adequate to supply the water demand. Reference: Section 603.1, IPC 2018. |
||
| 05/27/2025 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | fire extinguishers shall comply with Section 906 of the 2024 IFC. | ||
| 05/13/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |