Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1

Permit Number - TC-COM-0524-00909
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/07/2024 Site Zoning APPROVED
06/18/2024 Water - PDSD APPROVED
06/12/2024 Site Engineering NOT REQUIRED
09/06/2024 Bldg Permits - Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
09/06/2024 External Reviewers - Stantec REQUIRES RESUBMIT May 21, 2024
1st Review

JM Jr. Architect
Attn: Joseph Maher Jr.
4849 East Scarlett St.
Tucson, Arizona 85711

Re: SPANISH TRAIL CONDOS UNIT 225
REPAIR

City of Tucson Permit Number: TC-COM-0524-00909
Stantec Project Number: 185215066
Stantec File Number: TUC-24-044

Plan review for the above referenced project has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. PLEASE send all response to comments back to the City through the permit portal! Responses sent directly to Stantec will be ignored. Also, please submit complete copies of all permit documents (i.e. plans, calculations, reports, etc.) even if they have not been changed. Please cloud and delta all changes and provide a letter with a written response to each of the comments indicating the action taken.

The scope of this review covers the architectural and structural designs as they relate to the codes adopted by the jurisdiction. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval.

Occupancy
Group Construction
Type Area
(Square feet) Occupant
Load Automatic
Fire Sprinklers Fire
Alarms
R-2 V-B 958 5 No No
Separate Permits: None.
Deferred Submittals: None.
Special Inspections: None.

ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS

There are no comments.

STRUCTURAL COMMENTS

Sheet S2.0

1. Please clarify the methods of construction for Keynote 4. The keynote indicates that the existing beam is to be removed or remained without connecting to the new beam. If the existing beam is structural, please clarify what modifications are to be made to reinforce the roof if removed as stated or if the beam is to remain address how and to what this beam will connect to transfer its load.

Sheet S3.0

1. Please clarify Detail 201. Note 6 on Detail 201 indicates shoring of the floor but sheet S2.0 indicates a roof framing plan. Are the beams located in the floor of the second story or roof? Please clarify and coordinate within the plan-set.

MECHANICAL COMMENTS

There are no comments.

PLUMBING COMMENTS

There are no comments.

ELECTRICAL COMMENTS

There are no comments.


Should you have any questions regarding the plan review comments, please contact the plan reviewer listed for the appropriate discipline.

Plans reviewed by:
Trevor Bies,
Senior Plan Reviewer
602-338-9922
trevor.bies@stantec.com
05/21/2024 Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED
05/16/2024 PDSD Application Completeness REVIEW COMPLETED