Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0523-01415
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2023 | Water - PDSD | APPROVED | |||
| 06/16/2023 | Site Engineering | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 06/30/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 06/20/2023 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Activity Number: TC-COM-0523-01415 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. Structural(S) Reviewer Daljit Benipal dbenipal@safebuilt.com Conditionally Approved Reason: Date Completed : 6/16/2023 3:44:21 PM NOTE: Every effort has been made to identify the code violations. Any oversight by the review team shall not be considered an authority to violate, set aside, cancel or alter applicable codes or ordinances. The plan review and permit issuance shall not be considered a warranty or guarantee. The Structural Engineer is responsible for following ALL applicable Federal, State and local Municipal Codes and Ordinances. Building(B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 6/14/2023 6:06:07 PM 1. Sheet CR: Several of the exits discharge into fenced in areas and do not show the continuation to public way. Provide a clear path to public way including the installation of operable gates in accordance with Section 1028.5. 2. Sheet CR: A mix use situation is present, however, no indication as to the mix use approach has been provided. Provide a detailed code analysis regarding the mix use approach being used (separated/non-separated). Rated separation may be required. 3. Sheet CR: Provide additional clarification regarding existing adjacent tenants to ensure proper separation. 4. Sheet A1.2: At least 5% of the dining surfaces are required to have mobility features. Provide calculations of the required amount of accessible seating and indicate the locations. Additionally, ensure that surfaces are properly dispersed throughout the structure. Section 226.1 and 226.2 of the 2010 ADAAG. Mechanical(M) Reviewer Neil Samaan nsamaan@safebuilt.com Conditionally Approved Reason: Date Completed : 6/4/2023 9:24:18 PM Approved/subject to field approval Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 6/15/2023 6:10:50 PM Electrical Review of Beyond Bread By: Ron Ross PE E0.2 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES: Kitchen equipment # E87 doesn’t agree with FS2.1 Kitchen Equipment schedule. Some equipment in Kitchen equipment schedule calls out to verify. Recheck and coordinate. E2.2 ELECTRICAL ENLARGED POWER FLOOR PLAN-NORTH: All receptacles located within 6 feet of any sink or on a counter top shall be GFCI protected per NEC 210.8. If the receptacle is 208V, this needs to be provided via GFCI circuit breaker. GFCI protection shall be called out on this sheet or on the panel schedules. Clarify on the drawings where to reference GFCI protection. E2.3 ELECTRICAL ENLARGED POWER FLOOR PLAN-EAST: Receptacle on wall by door on North wall needs more circuit information. E3.0 ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE DIAGRAM: 1000 amp Panel HDP is mislabeled as a 208V panel. Panel schedule SES-1 has unneeded and undersized conductors (only shows 1 feeder) called out for Future PV. Panel schedule SES-1 has only Phase A load for XFMR TH. Should probably be across 3 phases unless poorly loaded. 400 amp feeder from Panel LDP to Panel P1 should be more clear about requiring two sets of feeders vs two conduits. 450 amp feeder from Panel HDP to Disconnect EL3 should be more clear about requiring two sets of feeders vs two conduits E4.0 ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE DIAGRAM SES-2 & SES-3: Comment only, why isn’t SES-3 a 240V system vs 208V? Typically, the local power company would provide 240V for this type of service. Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 6/18/2023 5:51:47 PM First Plumbing Review: 1). Cafe floor sink on plan pages P2.3 , P2.5, P4.0 needs to discharge to the grease system -IPC 1003.1 2). Plan page A1.1 Ice machines #181 & 182 can't be located in Laundry - Update all affected plumbing & floor plan pages. - IPC 801.2 3). Washer on plan pages P2.5 & P4.0 need to discharge thru a lint interceptor -IPC 1003.6 4). Floor sink beyond the walk-in production cooler on plan page P2.4 can't be located on the exterior of the bldg. -IPC 1101.3 5). First double wye on grease system page P4.0 is in the wrong direction of flow -IPC 706.3 6). Restrooms 116 & 117 on plan page A1.1 can't open into baking area - IPC 403.3.2, Update all affected pages 7). Baking oven water connections on plan page P2.2 need backflow protection -IPC 608.3 8). TMV needs to be shown at Lavs on plan pageP2.2 -IPC 419.5 9). Plan page A1.4 notes 8 & 9 show new roof drains & Gutter, plans need to include sizing calculations - IPC 1106.1, 1106.2, 1106.3, 1106 10). Plan page A1.4 needs to include downspout sizing information. -IPC 1106.3 11). plan page A1.4 needs to include Roof drain & overflow detail. 12). Plan page P0.1 fixture schedule needs to include roof drain & overflow assembly info - IPC 1102.6 13). Plumbing plans need to include roof drain & routing illustrations - IPC 106.3.1 |
||
| 06/08/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | FROM: PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-COM-0523-01415 825 S. Park Ave. - I-1 Food & Beverage Wholesaling & Commercial Storage (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 08, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in I-1 zone (UDC 4.7.29), Food & Beverage Wholesaling & Commercial Storage are allowed use in the zone (UDC Table 4.8-5), subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.10.a & 4.9.13.Q. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with Development Package (DP) TD-DEV-0223-00140 and there appears to be a discrepancy between the two plans. The building plans are proposing a “Café” or food service. Food service was not a use provided on the DP. As the DP has not been approved the DP will need to revised to so the food service use and all calculation revised. Until a DP addressing the food service use is approved Zoning cannot approve this building plan. 2. There is also a staircase called out under Keynote 9 on sheet A1.1 that is not shown on the DP and appears to encroach into a required loading space. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 06/27/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/01/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |