Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0523-01329
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/27/2023 | Water - PDSD | APPROVED | |||
| 06/27/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 06/20/2023 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Activity Number: TC-COM-0523-01329 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. Structural(S) Reviewer Daljit Benipal dbenipal@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 6/19/2023 5:47:37 PM 1. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 54 of 540 for Wood Joist – Pheasantry 1. The calculations refer to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10. Revise calculations per IBC 2018 and ASCE 7-16 and resubmit. 2. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 177 of 540 for Concrete Roof Slab Strip. The calculations show Bending Stress Ratio as 1.14. Investigate and make revisions as needed and resubmit. 3. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 195, 196 of 540 for C1’s Footing - F2. The calculations show reinforcing less than Minimum on page 196 Investigate and submit response. 4. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 246 of 540 for Reptile B1. The calculations refer to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10. Revise calculations per IBC 2018 and ASCE 7-16 and resubmit. 5. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 251 of 540 for Reptile B2. The calculations refer to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10. Revise calculations per IBC 2018 and ASCE 7-16 and resubmit. 6. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 305 of 540 for CMU Wall-Siamang. The calculations refer to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10. Revise calculations per IBC 2018 and ASCE 7-16 and resubmit. 7. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 309 of 540 for Wall Footing - Siamang. The calculations refer to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10. Revise calculations per IBC 2018 and ASCE 7-16 and resubmit. 8. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 313 of 540 for Lintel LT1-Sloth Beam. The calculations refer to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10. Revise calculations per IBC 2018 and ASCE 7-16 and resubmit. 9. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 315 of 540 for Lintel LT2-Sloth Beam. The calculations refer to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10. Revise calculations per IBC 2018 and ASCE 7-16 and resubmit. 10. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 317 of 540 for Lintel LT1-Sloth Beam. The calculations refer to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10. Revise calculations per IBC 2018 and ASCE 7-16 and resubmit. 11. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 313 to 320 of 540 for Cantilevered Retaining Wall. The calculations refer to IBC 2012. Revise calculations per IBC 2018 and ASCE 7-16 and resubmit. 12. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 322 of 540 for Wire Mesh Roof Steel Column-Siamang. The calculations refer to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10. Revise calculations per IBC 2018 and ASCE 7-16 and resubmit. 13. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 332 of 540 for Wire Mesh Roof Footing-Siamang. The calculations refer to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10. Revise calculations per IBC 2018 and ASCE 7-16 and resubmit. 14. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 527 of 540 for J1. The calculations refer to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10. Revise calculations per IBC 2018 and ASCE 7-16 and resubmit. 15. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 529 of 540 for J1. The calculations refer to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10. Revise calculations per IBC 2018 and ASCE 7-16 and resubmit. 16. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 531 of 540 for B1. The calculations refer to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10. Revise calculations per IBC 2018 and ASCE 7-16 and resubmit. 17. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 533 of 540 for B2. The calculations refer to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10. Revise calculations per IBC 2018 and ASCE 7-16 and resubmit. 18. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 535 of 540 for C1. The calculations refer to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10. Revise calculations per IBC 2018 and ASCE 7-16 and resubmit. 19. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 537 of 540 for C2 W/Gravity Loads. The calculations refer to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10. Revise calculations per IBC 2018 and ASCE 7-16 and resubmit. 20. Refer to Structural Calculations page marked 539 of 540 for Adjacent Retaining Wall. The calculations refer to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10. Revise calculations per IBC 2018 and ASCE 7-16 and resubmit. Submit a response letter addressing these correction items and provide bubbles on the revisions to the drawings. Building(B) Reviewer Janet Matz jmatz@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 6/17/2023 5:29:29 AM General 1. Note on the cover sheet that all work will be done in accordance with the following codes as adopted by the City of Tucson: ◦ 2018 International Building Code ◦ 2018 International Fire Code ◦ 2018 International Mechanical Code ◦ 2018 International Plumbing Code ◦ 2017 National Electrical Code ◦ 2018 International Energy Conservation Code ◦ City of Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code ◦ ICC A117.1-2009 Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities 2. Indicate the required glazing U factor and SHGC on the drawings. 2018 IECC Table C402.4. 3. Indicate on the drawings that Fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with 2018 IFC section 906.2. 4. Clarify where the detail is for the interior metal wall framing, only exterior block wall sections were found on the detail sheets. 5. Clarify where the details for the interior door frame installation on the metal framed walls can be found, only details for CMU walls were found on the details. 6. Clarify where the detail and framing requirements for the metal support framing for the 5/8 gypsum board ceiling can be found. 7. Clarify where the detail is for the suspended tile ceiling can be found on the drawings or provide a new detail for this work including the required hangers and attachment to the roof structure. Asia Pavilion AA 1. Indicate the proposed furniture layout for the dining room on the code plan sheet AA0.1. The exit distance from the far corner of the Women’s restroom shall include the distances required to go around any semi-permanent furniture. 2018 IBC 1017.3. 2. The roof details on sheet AA8.1 indicate a 2x end plate attached to SIP “in a way which accommodates load for bargeboard” fascia and finials. The notes further indicate to see the structural drawings for the attachment of the bargeboard to the 2x blocking. Clarify if the 2x end plate connection is also shown on the structural plans or provide specifics for its attachment to the SIP panel. 3. Clarify the distance from the men’s room door 5 to the hand dryer. It is unknown if the dryer is fully recessed or only partially, and if the distance from the door frame is a minimum of 18” per ICC A117.1-2009 Figure 404.2.3.5. 4. Provide elevation details for the built in cabinetry and sink in the multi-purpose room 1 detail 6 on sheet AA6.2 that is compliant with ICC A117.1-2009. 5. Indicate on the finish schedule on sheet AA2.4 that all interior finishes will be in accordance with 2018 IBC 803.1. Pheasantry AF 1. Clarify the distance from the family restroom door 4 to the edge of the sink, a minimum of 18” is required per ICC A117.1-2009 Figure 404.2.3.5. 2. Indicate a minimum of 12” on the latch side of the door on the exterior for the doors to the nursing room and family restroom if a latch and closer are provided. The doors to the nursing room 3 and the family restroom 4 would be considered recessed doors since the 3.3” of ridged and 8” of rock wall exceeds the 8” allowed. ICC A117.1-2009 Figure 404.2.3.5. Provide details and update the drawings accordingly to meet the requirements. 3. Clarify the clear width of vestibule 5 on the drawings. The dimensions indicate 5’-5” to the interior of the wall. Once you subtract the 8” CMU, 3.3” of ridged and the 8” rock wall, there is 45.7” left which is not sufficient. A minimum of 48” is required for a recessed door. ICC A117.1-2009 Figure 404.2.3.5. Otter night house AO 1. Update the exit travel distance in the keeper area to show it ending up at the door, not the adjacent wall. 2. Provide ramp details or indicate on the drawings where these details can be found. This would include the clear width, maximum rise/ run, platforms, guards, and other pertinent information. 2018 IBC 1012. 3. Provide stair details or indicate on the drawings where these details can be found. This would include the clear width, maximum height of risers, minimum tread size, platforms, guards, and handrails. (The detail only indicates to divide the dimensions equally for the treads and risers. Risers shall be 4” minimum and 7” maximum in height. Treads shall be 11” minimum in depth. ICCI A117.1- 2009 504.2.). 2018 IBC 1011. Reptile building AR 1. Provide a code plan including exiting distances and occupant load for the enclosed aviary that is open to the public. 2. Correct the millwork elevation for the keeper’s workspace interior elevation and indicate a max height of 34” above the finished floor for the counter and sink. ICC A117.1-2009 Figure 308.3.2 and 606.3. 3. Provide a height for the built in office countertop on the elevations sheet AR3.3. ICC A117.1-2009 Figure 308.3.2. 4. Clarify the distance from the staff restroom door 19 to the edge of the sink, a minimum of 18” is required per ICC A117.1-2009 Figure 404.2.3.5. 5. Provide a clear width dimension for vestibule 9 and verify if the exterior wall finish will extend more than 8” into the space requiring clearance for a recessed door. See note 3 above for the Pheasantry. 6. Clarify the distance from the men’s room door to the hand dryer. It is unknown if the dryer is fully recessed or only partially, and if the distance from the door frame is a minimum of 18” per ICC A117.1-2009 Figure 404.2.3.5. Tiger Nighthouse AT 1. Clarify the distance from the men’s room door to the hand dryer. It is unknown if the dryer is fully recessed or only partially, and if the distance from the door frame is a minimum of 18” per ICC A117.1-2009 Figure 404.2.3.5. Tiger Life Support AW 1. Provide stair details or indicate on the drawings where these details can be found. This would include the clear width, maximum height of risers, minimum tread size, platforms, guards, and handrails. (The detail only indicates to divide the dimensions equally for the treads and risers. Risers shall be 4” minimum and 7” maximum in height. Treads shall be 11” minimum in depth. ICCI A117.1- 2009 504.2.). 2018 IBC 1011. Mechanical(M) Reviewer Neil Samaan nsamaan@safebuilt.com Conditionally Approved Reason: Date Completed : 6/11/2023 11:18:00 PM Approved/subject to field approval Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Conditionally Approved Reason: Date Completed : 6/16/2023 3:04:09 PM Electrical Review of Zoo By: Ron Ross PE Approved with the following comments/suggestions to incorporate into IFC document. 233 ESP1.0 OVERALL SITE PLAN - POWER: Keynotes 11 & 12 don’t point to anything. 234 ESP1.1 ENLARGED SITE PLAN - POWER AREA 1: Keynotes are ‘A’ and ‘B’, not 1 & 2 as used by drawing. 239 EA2.1 ASIA PAVILION - LIGHTING PLAN: Missing exit sign in Storage/Laundry Room 18. 240 EA2.2 ASIA PAVILION - POWER PLAN: Could not locate Keynotes 13, 14, 15, and 16. 241 EA2.3 ASIA PAVILION - ROOF POWER PLAN: Missing from set as per sheet index. 245 EF2.1 PHEASANTRY- ELECTRICAL PLANS: An extra Keynote #6 is on detail #2. 248 ER2.2 REPTILE BUILDING - POWER PLANS: Missing Keynote descriptions for 4, 5, and 21. 249 ER2.3 REPTILE BUILDING - ROOF POWER PLAN: Missing Keynote #1. 253 EU2.1 TIGER PAVILIONS - ELECTRICAL PLANS: Comment only, Circuits are being supplied by the LNSC panel, but isn’t panel LNT closer or more convenient? 256 EN3.0 ELECTRICAL SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM AND CALCULATIONS: One Line for SESR shows conductor between Panel DHNR and 45 KVA transformer is larger than what is used for short circuit calculations. Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 6/14/2023 7:55:50 PM First Plumbing Review: 1). Drinking fountain on plan page AA2.1 needs to be high/low type -IPC 410.3 2). Plan pages AA2.2, AR2.3, AT2.2, needs to include gutter & downspout sizing calculations - IPC 1106.1, 1106.3, 1106.6 3). Plan page AA2.2, PC2.1, needs to show secondary scupper locations. -IPC 1106.5, 1108 4). Plan page AA2.2 needs to include scupper sizing calculations. -IPC 1106.5, 1108 5). Plan AF5.1 needs to include overflow scupper detail. -IPC 106.3.1 1106.5, 1108 6). Plan page Ar0.1 needs to include a high/low drinking fountain & service sink. -IPC 403.1 7). Lavatories on plan page P0.1 need ASSE 1070 mixing valves -IPC 419.5 8). provide site utility piping plan for continuation of sewer, water, & storm as stated throughout plumbing plans. -IPC 106.3.1 9). label grease waste on Plan page P2.1 & PA2.3 -IPC 106.3.1 10). The 4 storm connected Fd-3 drains on plan page PA2.1 appear to be connected to areas that communicate with the interior of the building. floor drains can't connect to storm. -IPC 1104.2 11). Add Gas sizing table used to plan pages PA2.4, P02.2, PR2.2 -IFGC 402.4 12). Water line to #9 Drinking Pool on plan page PC2.1 needs a separate backflow device -IPC 608.3, Table 608.1 13). Water line to #12 Drinking Pool on plan page PPF2.1 needs a separate backflow device -IPC 608.3, Table 608.1 14). The #15 pool filler needs a backflow device on plan page P02.1 -IPC 608.3 15). What is the use of the storm connected floor sink on plan page P02.1? -see IPC 1104 16). Plan page P02.1 or M02.1 needs to illustrate pool heater exhaust & combustion air -IFGC 304, 503.1 17). Exterior Drinking Fountain on plan page PR2.1 Needs an over hang above -IPC 1101.3 18). Does the exterior Tortoise floor drain that is connected to the sanitary have a roof above? -IPC 1101.3 19). Gutter on plan page PT2.2 is undersized -IPC 1106.6 20). The domestic system that supplies the hot and cold pond fill on plan page P3.1 isn't properly protected -IPC 608.3 |
||
| 06/08/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The permit cannot be approved until the associated development package, TD-DEV-0523-00249, has been approved. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/06/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-COM-0523-01329 3400 E. Zoo Ct. – R-1 New Asia Exhibit, Reid Park Zoo (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: June 06, 2023 Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in R-1 Zone (UDC 4.7.8). Cultural Use: Government owned and operated only is an allowed use in the zone, (UDC Table 4.8-2). 1. As the first review of Development Package (DP) TD-DEV-0523-00249 has not been completed Zoning cannot review the building plans at this time and will review on the next submittal. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 05/30/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/25/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |