Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - LIMITED v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0425-00726
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - LIMITED v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/29/2025 | Commercial Building | APPROVED | |||
| 05/02/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 05/01/2025 | Signs | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | April 30. 2025 6401 S Nogales Hwy - TC-COM-0425-00726; COT 216 Damaged Billboard Comments: 1. On April 29, 2025 this reviewer visited the site and took photos. The Clear Channel documents state that there were no wood panels on the ground in the area. That isn't entirely accurate. Portions of the wood panels were on the ground and on the catwalk. In addition, there are at least two long, cloth tensioning straps, one on each end of the structure, but they are no longer holding anything together. If these straps were used to reinforce or support the now-missing plywood panels, that may be in violation of the Settlement Agreement Exhibit 9. I would request input from the City Attorney, because Exhibit 9.1(a) allows "ratchet straps" to be used to install the "copy", but not to reinforce the actual wood panel face. I would question if this is a violation that could result in the north face being removed entirely and not reinstalled. 2. The Details titled "Face Panel Attachment (South Face, Top View)" and "Poster Panel Side View," show an existing connection of a south-facing Metal Panel to a Stringer using "Obsolete face panel clips (18 pieces) to be removed and not reinstalled". A 16d nail is shown in the Attachment Detail as somehow connecting the metal panel to the obsolete clip, but how that actually works is not clear at all. In the field, I observed the clip but couldn't see the actual connection because the stringer was blocking the view. What is the existing 16d nail secured to? 3. The Scope of Work for the South (metal) face does not identify exactly where and how the metal panels are proposed to be attached to the new stringers. The proposed alternate attachment detail is not shown, but the Scope notes, "Reinstall existing (10 pcs.) 29"x 10'-6"x .03" vertical metal face panels with 1" depth of outside perimeter attaching with new (like) 16d nails." So, potentially, this doesn't match the requirement in Exhibit 9 for "like" materials utilized in the same manner as the existing. Please provide a clearer detail showing how the new 16d nails are proposed to secure the metal panels to the new stringers in a "like" manner if the obsolete clip is removed and not replaced. 4. The drawing on Sheet 2 titled "Poster Panel Top View," does not identify exactly what is being attached to the tapered I-beams. I suspect it is a stringer, not a metal or wood panel. Please clarify. 5. Please revise and resubmit the requested details. Kathi McLaughlin, BRC Reviewer |
||
| 05/02/2025 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Until approved by Signs Zoning cannot approve this permit. | ||
| 04/17/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |