Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Permit Number - TC-COM-0325-00482
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/03/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 05/07/2025 | Commercial Building Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | May 7, 2025 2nd Review ASI Architects Attn: Phillip Veneziano 5931 E. Pima Street Tucson, Arizona 85712 Re: KOCH WAREHOUSE NEW BUILDING City of Tucson Permit Number: TC-COM-0325-00482 Stantec Project Number: 185215066 Stantec File Number: TUC-25-034 Plan review for the above referenced project has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. PLEASE send all response to comments back to the City through the permit portal! Responses sent directly to Stantec will be ignored. Also, please submit complete copies of all permit documents (i.e. plans, calculations, reports, etc.) even if they have not been changed. Please cloud and delta all changes and provide a letter with a written response to each of the comments indicating the action taken. The scope of this review covers the architectural, structural, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical designs as they relate to the codes adopted by the jurisdiction. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. Occupancy Group Construction Type Area (Square feet) Occupant Load Automatic Fire Sprinklers Fire Alarms S-1 V-B 5,000 10 No No Separate Permits: None. Deferred Submittals: None. Special Inspections: Earthwork, concrete, and high-strength bolts. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS Sheet G1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Previous Comment: Note on the cover of the drawings that special inspection is required for earthwork, concrete, high-strength bolts. Also, provide City of Tucson special inspection certificate(s) with Parts A and B completed. Make sure that the owner or their legal representative signs the form. {Please see the structural comment and coordinate accordingly.} Still Required: A special inspection certificate was not provided for the listed special inspections on the cover sheet for earthwork, concrete, and high-strength bolts. Please provide a special inspection certificate with Parts A and B completed. 3. Addressed. 4. New Comment: The response letter indicated that miscellaneous furniture will be stored in the proposed warehouse. This warehouse will require a fire sprinkler system in accordance with section 903.2.9 of the 2018 IBC as it is over 2,500 square feet and is used for the storage of furniture. Please update the code analysis to reflect the fire sprinkler system. 5. New Comment: Please indicate that the automatic fire sprinkler system [2018 IBC Sec. 903] is to be provided as part of this project and is to be submitted as a separate permit (not a deferred submittal). 6. New Comment: Please remove the reference of the pre-engineered metal building as a deferred submittal since it has been provided with this submittal. Sheet SP1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. 3. Addressed. Sheet A1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Previous Comment: Please provide a service sink for the structure. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 2902] Still Required: A separate service sink fixture is required to meet Table 2902.1 of the 2018 IBC. This cannot be incorporated into the lavatory sink. 3. Addressed. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS Sheet S1.0 1. Addressed. MECHANICAL COMMENTS There are no comments. PLUMBING COMMENTS Sheet P1.0 1. Addressed. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS General 1. Previous Comment: Please provide a statement that special inspection is required (or is not required) per Sec. 104.2.2 of the 2012 City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. Still Required: The statement needs to be included with the outdoor lighting calculations on Sheet E1.0. 2. Addressed. Sheet E1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Previous Comment: The electrical design is conflicting. The one-line and panel schedule indicate this to be a single-phase system, but the voltage is indicated as 120/208 which would refer to a three-phase system. If this is a single-phase 400-amp service, then the voltage should be 120/240. Please revise accordingly and be sure to update the load calculations as well. Sill Required: The load calculations were not updated in the revised set to reflect the single-phase service. The volt-amperes are still calculated at 208 volts and should be calculated using 240 volts. 3. New Comment: Panel ‘A’ still indicates a 120/208-volt system. Please revise to reflect the 120/240-volt system. Should you have any questions regarding the plan review comments, please contact the plan reviewer listed for the appropriate discipline. Plans reviewed by: Trevor Bies, Senior Plan Reviewer 602-338-9922 trevor.bies@stantec.com |
||
| 05/07/2025 | Commercial Electrical Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | May 7, 2025 2nd Review ASI Architects Attn: Phillip Veneziano 5931 E. Pima Street Tucson, Arizona 85712 Re: KOCH WAREHOUSE NEW BUILDING City of Tucson Permit Number: TC-COM-0325-00482 Stantec Project Number: 185215066 Stantec File Number: TUC-25-034 Plan review for the above referenced project has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. PLEASE send all response to comments back to the City through the permit portal! Responses sent directly to Stantec will be ignored. Also, please submit complete copies of all permit documents (i.e. plans, calculations, reports, etc.) even if they have not been changed. Please cloud and delta all changes and provide a letter with a written response to each of the comments indicating the action taken. The scope of this review covers the architectural, structural, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical designs as they relate to the codes adopted by the jurisdiction. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. Occupancy Group Construction Type Area (Square feet) Occupant Load Automatic Fire Sprinklers Fire Alarms S-1 V-B 5,000 10 No No Separate Permits: None. Deferred Submittals: None. Special Inspections: Earthwork, concrete, and high-strength bolts. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS Sheet G1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Previous Comment: Note on the cover of the drawings that special inspection is required for earthwork, concrete, high-strength bolts. Also, provide City of Tucson special inspection certificate(s) with Parts A and B completed. Make sure that the owner or their legal representative signs the form. {Please see the structural comment and coordinate accordingly.} Still Required: A special inspection certificate was not provided for the listed special inspections on the cover sheet for earthwork, concrete, and high-strength bolts. Please provide a special inspection certificate with Parts A and B completed. 3. Addressed. 4. New Comment: The response letter indicated that miscellaneous furniture will be stored in the proposed warehouse. This warehouse will require a fire sprinkler system in accordance with section 903.2.9 of the 2018 IBC as it is over 2,500 square feet and is used for the storage of furniture. Please update the code analysis to reflect the fire sprinkler system. 5. New Comment: Please indicate that the automatic fire sprinkler system [2018 IBC Sec. 903] is to be provided as part of this project and is to be submitted as a separate permit (not a deferred submittal). 6. New Comment: Please remove the reference of the pre-engineered metal building as a deferred submittal since it has been provided with this submittal. Sheet SP1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. 3. Addressed. Sheet A1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Previous Comment: Please provide a service sink for the structure. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 2902] Still Required: A separate service sink fixture is required to meet Table 2902.1 of the 2018 IBC. This cannot be incorporated into the lavatory sink. 3. Addressed. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS Sheet S1.0 1. Addressed. MECHANICAL COMMENTS There are no comments. PLUMBING COMMENTS Sheet P1.0 1. Addressed. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS General 1. Previous Comment: Please provide a statement that special inspection is required (or is not required) per Sec. 104.2.2 of the 2012 City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. Still Required: The statement needs to be included with the outdoor lighting calculations on Sheet E1.0. 2. Addressed. Sheet E1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Previous Comment: The electrical design is conflicting. The one-line and panel schedule indicate this to be a single-phase system, but the voltage is indicated as 120/208 which would refer to a three-phase system. If this is a single-phase 400-amp service, then the voltage should be 120/240. Please revise accordingly and be sure to update the load calculations as well. Sill Required: The load calculations were not updated in the revised set to reflect the single-phase service. The volt-amperes are still calculated at 208 volts and should be calculated using 240 volts. 3. New Comment: Panel ‘A’ still indicates a 120/208-volt system. Please revise to reflect the 120/240-volt system. Should you have any questions regarding the plan review comments, please contact the plan reviewer listed for the appropriate discipline. Plans reviewed by: Trevor Bies, Senior Plan Reviewer 602-338-9922 trevor.bies@stantec.com |
||
| 05/07/2025 | Commercial Mechanical Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | May 7, 2025 2nd Review ASI Architects Attn: Phillip Veneziano 5931 E. Pima Street Tucson, Arizona 85712 Re: KOCH WAREHOUSE NEW BUILDING City of Tucson Permit Number: TC-COM-0325-00482 Stantec Project Number: 185215066 Stantec File Number: TUC-25-034 Plan review for the above referenced project has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. PLEASE send all response to comments back to the City through the permit portal! Responses sent directly to Stantec will be ignored. Also, please submit complete copies of all permit documents (i.e. plans, calculations, reports, etc.) even if they have not been changed. Please cloud and delta all changes and provide a letter with a written response to each of the comments indicating the action taken. The scope of this review covers the architectural, structural, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical designs as they relate to the codes adopted by the jurisdiction. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. Occupancy Group Construction Type Area (Square feet) Occupant Load Automatic Fire Sprinklers Fire Alarms S-1 V-B 5,000 10 No No Separate Permits: None. Deferred Submittals: None. Special Inspections: Earthwork, concrete, and high-strength bolts. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS Sheet G1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Previous Comment: Note on the cover of the drawings that special inspection is required for earthwork, concrete, high-strength bolts. Also, provide City of Tucson special inspection certificate(s) with Parts A and B completed. Make sure that the owner or their legal representative signs the form. {Please see the structural comment and coordinate accordingly.} Still Required: A special inspection certificate was not provided for the listed special inspections on the cover sheet for earthwork, concrete, and high-strength bolts. Please provide a special inspection certificate with Parts A and B completed. 3. Addressed. 4. New Comment: The response letter indicated that miscellaneous furniture will be stored in the proposed warehouse. This warehouse will require a fire sprinkler system in accordance with section 903.2.9 of the 2018 IBC as it is over 2,500 square feet and is used for the storage of furniture. Please update the code analysis to reflect the fire sprinkler system. 5. New Comment: Please indicate that the automatic fire sprinkler system [2018 IBC Sec. 903] is to be provided as part of this project and is to be submitted as a separate permit (not a deferred submittal). 6. New Comment: Please remove the reference of the pre-engineered metal building as a deferred submittal since it has been provided with this submittal. Sheet SP1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. 3. Addressed. Sheet A1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Previous Comment: Please provide a service sink for the structure. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 2902] Still Required: A separate service sink fixture is required to meet Table 2902.1 of the 2018 IBC. This cannot be incorporated into the lavatory sink. 3. Addressed. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS Sheet S1.0 1. Addressed. MECHANICAL COMMENTS There are no comments. PLUMBING COMMENTS Sheet P1.0 1. Addressed. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS General 1. Previous Comment: Please provide a statement that special inspection is required (or is not required) per Sec. 104.2.2 of the 2012 City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. Still Required: The statement needs to be included with the outdoor lighting calculations on Sheet E1.0. 2. Addressed. Sheet E1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Previous Comment: The electrical design is conflicting. The one-line and panel schedule indicate this to be a single-phase system, but the voltage is indicated as 120/208 which would refer to a three-phase system. If this is a single-phase 400-amp service, then the voltage should be 120/240. Please revise accordingly and be sure to update the load calculations as well. Sill Required: The load calculations were not updated in the revised set to reflect the single-phase service. The volt-amperes are still calculated at 208 volts and should be calculated using 240 volts. 3. New Comment: Panel ‘A’ still indicates a 120/208-volt system. Please revise to reflect the 120/240-volt system. Should you have any questions regarding the plan review comments, please contact the plan reviewer listed for the appropriate discipline. Plans reviewed by: Trevor Bies, Senior Plan Reviewer 602-338-9922 trevor.bies@stantec.com |
||
| 05/07/2025 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | May 7, 2025 2nd Review ASI Architects Attn: Phillip Veneziano 5931 E. Pima Street Tucson, Arizona 85712 Re: KOCH WAREHOUSE NEW BUILDING City of Tucson Permit Number: TC-COM-0325-00482 Stantec Project Number: 185215066 Stantec File Number: TUC-25-034 Plan review for the above referenced project has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. PLEASE send all response to comments back to the City through the permit portal! Responses sent directly to Stantec will be ignored. Also, please submit complete copies of all permit documents (i.e. plans, calculations, reports, etc.) even if they have not been changed. Please cloud and delta all changes and provide a letter with a written response to each of the comments indicating the action taken. The scope of this review covers the architectural, structural, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical designs as they relate to the codes adopted by the jurisdiction. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. Occupancy Group Construction Type Area (Square feet) Occupant Load Automatic Fire Sprinklers Fire Alarms S-1 V-B 5,000 10 No No Separate Permits: None. Deferred Submittals: None. Special Inspections: Earthwork, concrete, and high-strength bolts. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS Sheet G1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Previous Comment: Note on the cover of the drawings that special inspection is required for earthwork, concrete, high-strength bolts. Also, provide City of Tucson special inspection certificate(s) with Parts A and B completed. Make sure that the owner or their legal representative signs the form. {Please see the structural comment and coordinate accordingly.} Still Required: A special inspection certificate was not provided for the listed special inspections on the cover sheet for earthwork, concrete, and high-strength bolts. Please provide a special inspection certificate with Parts A and B completed. 3. Addressed. 4. New Comment: The response letter indicated that miscellaneous furniture will be stored in the proposed warehouse. This warehouse will require a fire sprinkler system in accordance with section 903.2.9 of the 2018 IBC as it is over 2,500 square feet and is used for the storage of furniture. Please update the code analysis to reflect the fire sprinkler system. 5. New Comment: Please indicate that the automatic fire sprinkler system [2018 IBC Sec. 903] is to be provided as part of this project and is to be submitted as a separate permit (not a deferred submittal). 6. New Comment: Please remove the reference of the pre-engineered metal building as a deferred submittal since it has been provided with this submittal. Sheet SP1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. 3. Addressed. Sheet A1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Previous Comment: Please provide a service sink for the structure. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 2902] Still Required: A separate service sink fixture is required to meet Table 2902.1 of the 2018 IBC. This cannot be incorporated into the lavatory sink. 3. Addressed. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS Sheet S1.0 1. Addressed. MECHANICAL COMMENTS There are no comments. PLUMBING COMMENTS Sheet P1.0 1. Addressed. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS General 1. Previous Comment: Please provide a statement that special inspection is required (or is not required) per Sec. 104.2.2 of the 2012 City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. Still Required: The statement needs to be included with the outdoor lighting calculations on Sheet E1.0. 2. Addressed. Sheet E1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Previous Comment: The electrical design is conflicting. The one-line and panel schedule indicate this to be a single-phase system, but the voltage is indicated as 120/208 which would refer to a three-phase system. If this is a single-phase 400-amp service, then the voltage should be 120/240. Please revise accordingly and be sure to update the load calculations as well. Sill Required: The load calculations were not updated in the revised set to reflect the single-phase service. The volt-amperes are still calculated at 208 volts and should be calculated using 240 volts. 3. New Comment: Panel ‘A’ still indicates a 120/208-volt system. Please revise to reflect the 120/240-volt system. Should you have any questions regarding the plan review comments, please contact the plan reviewer listed for the appropriate discipline. Plans reviewed by: Trevor Bies, Senior Plan Reviewer 602-338-9922 trevor.bies@stantec.com |
||
| 05/07/2025 | Outdoor Lighting Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | May 7, 2025 2nd Review ASI Architects Attn: Phillip Veneziano 5931 E. Pima Street Tucson, Arizona 85712 Re: KOCH WAREHOUSE NEW BUILDING City of Tucson Permit Number: TC-COM-0325-00482 Stantec Project Number: 185215066 Stantec File Number: TUC-25-034 Plan review for the above referenced project has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. PLEASE send all response to comments back to the City through the permit portal! Responses sent directly to Stantec will be ignored. Also, please submit complete copies of all permit documents (i.e. plans, calculations, reports, etc.) even if they have not been changed. Please cloud and delta all changes and provide a letter with a written response to each of the comments indicating the action taken. The scope of this review covers the architectural, structural, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical designs as they relate to the codes adopted by the jurisdiction. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. Occupancy Group Construction Type Area (Square feet) Occupant Load Automatic Fire Sprinklers Fire Alarms S-1 V-B 5,000 10 No No Separate Permits: None. Deferred Submittals: None. Special Inspections: Earthwork, concrete, and high-strength bolts. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS Sheet G1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Previous Comment: Note on the cover of the drawings that special inspection is required for earthwork, concrete, high-strength bolts. Also, provide City of Tucson special inspection certificate(s) with Parts A and B completed. Make sure that the owner or their legal representative signs the form. {Please see the structural comment and coordinate accordingly.} Still Required: A special inspection certificate was not provided for the listed special inspections on the cover sheet for earthwork, concrete, and high-strength bolts. Please provide a special inspection certificate with Parts A and B completed. 3. Addressed. 4. New Comment: The response letter indicated that miscellaneous furniture will be stored in the proposed warehouse. This warehouse will require a fire sprinkler system in accordance with section 903.2.9 of the 2018 IBC as it is over 2,500 square feet and is used for the storage of furniture. Please update the code analysis to reflect the fire sprinkler system. 5. New Comment: Please indicate that the automatic fire sprinkler system [2018 IBC Sec. 903] is to be provided as part of this project and is to be submitted as a separate permit (not a deferred submittal). 6. New Comment: Please remove the reference of the pre-engineered metal building as a deferred submittal since it has been provided with this submittal. Sheet SP1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. 3. Addressed. Sheet A1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Previous Comment: Please provide a service sink for the structure. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 2902] Still Required: A separate service sink fixture is required to meet Table 2902.1 of the 2018 IBC. This cannot be incorporated into the lavatory sink. 3. Addressed. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS Sheet S1.0 1. Addressed. MECHANICAL COMMENTS There are no comments. PLUMBING COMMENTS Sheet P1.0 1. Addressed. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS General 1. Previous Comment: Please provide a statement that special inspection is required (or is not required) per Sec. 104.2.2 of the 2012 City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. Still Required: The statement needs to be included with the outdoor lighting calculations on Sheet E1.0. 2. Addressed. Sheet E1.0 1. Addressed. 2. Previous Comment: The electrical design is conflicting. The one-line and panel schedule indicate this to be a single-phase system, but the voltage is indicated as 120/208 which would refer to a three-phase system. If this is a single-phase 400-amp service, then the voltage should be 120/240. Please revise accordingly and be sure to update the load calculations as well. Sill Required: The load calculations were not updated in the revised set to reflect the single-phase service. The volt-amperes are still calculated at 208 volts and should be calculated using 240 volts. 3. New Comment: Panel ‘A’ still indicates a 120/208-volt system. Please revise to reflect the 120/240-volt system. Should you have any questions regarding the plan review comments, please contact the plan reviewer listed for the appropriate discipline. Plans reviewed by: Trevor Bies, Senior Plan Reviewer 602-338-9922 trevor.bies@stantec.com |
||
| 06/03/2025 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. This site will require a development package per UDC Article 3.3.3.G.2.C which is a separate submittal - refer to engineering comments from pre-application meeting TP-PRE-0425-00080 for engineering requirements for the project. 2. This project is within a regulated floodplain and requires a Floodplain Use Permit (FUP.) Please start a new FUP at our permit application web page: https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/28/2025 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | FROM: PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-COM-0325-00482 523 E GAY ST. - C-2 Commercial Storage (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 28, 2025 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in the C-2 zone (UDC 4.7.21). Commercial Storage is an approved use in the zone (UDC Table 4.8-4), subject to Use Specific Standard 4.9.10.A. 1. This comment was not addressed: Per UDC Article 3.3.3.G.2.c A site plan (Development Package) is required for the following types of development: Existing development undergoing a change of use, building structure additions, and/or a reconfiguration of an area outside a building. A Development Package (DP) meeting the requirements of Administrative Manual (AM) 2-06 must be submitted and approved prior to approval of this building plan. The Administrative Manual can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes-and-Plans/Zoning-Code#section-1. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact fernando.garcia2@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 05/06/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |