Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0325-00482
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/03/2025 | Water - PDSD Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 04/04/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/20/2025 | Commercial Building Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | March 17, 2025 1st Review ASI Architects Attn: Phillip Veneziano 5931 E. Pima Street Tucson, Arizona 85712 Re: KOCH WAREHOUSE NEW BUILDING City of Tucson Permit Number: TC-COM-0325-00482 Stantec Project Number: 185215066 Stantec File Number: TUC-25-034 Plan review for the above referenced project has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. PLEASE send all response to comments back to the City through the permit portal! Responses sent directly to Stantec will be ignored. Also, please submit complete copies of all permit documents (i.e. plans, calculations, reports, etc.) even if they have not been changed. Please cloud and delta all changes and provide a letter with a written response to each of the comments indicating the action taken. The scope of this review covers the architectural, structural, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical designs as they relate to the codes adopted by the jurisdiction. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. Occupancy Group Construction Type Area (Square feet) Occupant Load Automatic Fire Sprinklers Fire Alarms S-1 V-B 5,000 10 No No Separate Permits: None. Deferred Submittals: Pre-engineered metal building. Special Inspections: Earthwork, concrete, and high-strength bolts. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS Sheet G1.0 1. Please clarify what will be stored in the proposed warehouse to classify as the Group S-1 occupancy stated. Please also be sure to include if high-piled storage will apply to this project as well. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 311.2 & 910.2.2] {I noticed the structural calculations included the name “More Than A Bed”. Is this space intended to be furniture storage? 2. Note on the cover of the drawings that special inspection is required for earthwork, concrete, high-strength bolts. Also, provide City of Tucson special inspection certificate(s) with Parts A and B completed. Make sure that the owner or their legal representative signs the form. {Please see the structural comment and coordinate accordingly.} 3. Please provide plumbing fixture calculations for the proposed warehouse. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 2902] Sheet SP1.0 1. The ‘Keynotes’ section that appears to pertain to the site plan on this sheet are not referenced on the actual site plan. Please revise. 2. The east wall of the building indicates 6’ from the property line. The wall is required to be 1-hour fire resistance rated for exposure from both sides of the wall. This also includes the steel columns supporting this exterior wall. Please provide the listed rated assembly numbers and details to achieve the required fire resistance rating. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 602, 705.5, 705.6] 3. Please provide on the site plan the rim elevation of manhole #920609 and include a back water valve if the elevation is over 2,348. [Ref. IPC 2018 Sec. 714.1] Sheet A1.0 1. The proposed warehouse does not meet the required 4% natural ventilation with openings. Please revise. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 1202.5.1] 2. Please provide a service sink for the structure. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 2902] 3. The cross section on this sheet calls out details 1 & 3 on sheet S1.0. Sheet S1.0 does not include these details. Please clarify. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS Sheet S1.0 1. The special inspections section on this sheet indicates special inspections for concrete, soils, and steel construction. The soils and concrete special inspections are not required due to the 2,500psi strength design and the assumed 1500psf soil bearing design. Do you still want these special inspections performed? If so, please coordinate with the applicant/architect and provide City of Tucson special inspection certificate(s) with Parts A and B completed. Make sure that the owner or their legal representative signs the form. If not, please remove these special inspections. MECHANICAL COMMENTS There are no comments. PLUMBING COMMENTS Sheet P1.0 1. Please provide a calculation for the water pressure drop from the service to the last remote fixture having the most demanding pressure. [Ref. IPC 2018 Sec. 604] ELECTRICAL COMMENTS General 1. Please provide a statement that special inspection is required (or is not required) per Sec. 104.2.2 of the 2012 City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. 2. Please provide short circuit current calculations for the proposed electrical design. [Ref. NEC 2017 Art. 110] Sheet E1.0 1. The interior lighting energy calculations are designed to the 2012 International Energy Code. Please revise to meet the 2018 International Energy Code as adopted by the City of Tucson. 2. The electrical design is conflicting. The one-line and panel schedule indicate this to be a single-phase system, but the voltage is indicated as 120/208 which would refer to a three-phase system. If this is a single-phase 400-amp service, then the voltage should be 120/240. Please revise accordingly and be sure to update the load calculations as well. Should you have any questions regarding the plan review comments, please contact the plan reviewer listed for the appropriate discipline. Plans reviewed by: Trevor Bies, Senior Plan Reviewer 602-338-9922 trevor.bies@stantec.com |
||
| 03/20/2025 | Commercial Electrical Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | March 17, 2025 1st Review ASI Architects Attn: Phillip Veneziano 5931 E. Pima Street Tucson, Arizona 85712 Re: KOCH WAREHOUSE NEW BUILDING City of Tucson Permit Number: TC-COM-0325-00482 Stantec Project Number: 185215066 Stantec File Number: TUC-25-034 Plan review for the above referenced project has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. PLEASE send all response to comments back to the City through the permit portal! Responses sent directly to Stantec will be ignored. Also, please submit complete copies of all permit documents (i.e. plans, calculations, reports, etc.) even if they have not been changed. Please cloud and delta all changes and provide a letter with a written response to each of the comments indicating the action taken. The scope of this review covers the architectural, structural, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical designs as they relate to the codes adopted by the jurisdiction. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. Occupancy Group Construction Type Area (Square feet) Occupant Load Automatic Fire Sprinklers Fire Alarms S-1 V-B 5,000 10 No No Separate Permits: None. Deferred Submittals: Pre-engineered metal building. Special Inspections: Earthwork, concrete, and high-strength bolts. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS Sheet G1.0 1. Please clarify what will be stored in the proposed warehouse to classify as the Group S-1 occupancy stated. Please also be sure to include if high-piled storage will apply to this project as well. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 311.2 & 910.2.2] {I noticed the structural calculations included the name “More Than A Bed”. Is this space intended to be furniture storage? 2. Note on the cover of the drawings that special inspection is required for earthwork, concrete, high-strength bolts. Also, provide City of Tucson special inspection certificate(s) with Parts A and B completed. Make sure that the owner or their legal representative signs the form. {Please see the structural comment and coordinate accordingly.} 3. Please provide plumbing fixture calculations for the proposed warehouse. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 2902] Sheet SP1.0 1. The ‘Keynotes’ section that appears to pertain to the site plan on this sheet are not referenced on the actual site plan. Please revise. 2. The east wall of the building indicates 6’ from the property line. The wall is required to be 1-hour fire resistance rated for exposure from both sides of the wall. This also includes the steel columns supporting this exterior wall. Please provide the listed rated assembly numbers and details to achieve the required fire resistance rating. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 602, 705.5, 705.6] 3. Please provide on the site plan the rim elevation of manhole #920609 and include a back water valve if the elevation is over 2,348. [Ref. IPC 2018 Sec. 714.1] Sheet A1.0 1. The proposed warehouse does not meet the required 4% natural ventilation with openings. Please revise. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 1202.5.1] 2. Please provide a service sink for the structure. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 2902] 3. The cross section on this sheet calls out details 1 & 3 on sheet S1.0. Sheet S1.0 does not include these details. Please clarify. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS Sheet S1.0 1. The special inspections section on this sheet indicates special inspections for concrete, soils, and steel construction. The soils and concrete special inspections are not required due to the 2,500psi strength design and the assumed 1500psf soil bearing design. Do you still want these special inspections performed? If so, please coordinate with the applicant/architect and provide City of Tucson special inspection certificate(s) with Parts A and B completed. Make sure that the owner or their legal representative signs the form. If not, please remove these special inspections. MECHANICAL COMMENTS There are no comments. PLUMBING COMMENTS Sheet P1.0 1. Please provide a calculation for the water pressure drop from the service to the last remote fixture having the most demanding pressure. [Ref. IPC 2018 Sec. 604] ELECTRICAL COMMENTS General 1. Please provide a statement that special inspection is required (or is not required) per Sec. 104.2.2 of the 2012 City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. 2. Please provide short circuit current calculations for the proposed electrical design. [Ref. NEC 2017 Art. 110] Sheet E1.0 1. The interior lighting energy calculations are designed to the 2012 International Energy Code. Please revise to meet the 2018 International Energy Code as adopted by the City of Tucson. 2. The electrical design is conflicting. The one-line and panel schedule indicate this to be a single-phase system, but the voltage is indicated as 120/208 which would refer to a three-phase system. If this is a single-phase 400-amp service, then the voltage should be 120/240. Please revise accordingly and be sure to update the load calculations as well. Should you have any questions regarding the plan review comments, please contact the plan reviewer listed for the appropriate discipline. Plans reviewed by: Trevor Bies, Senior Plan Reviewer 602-338-9922 trevor.bies@stantec.com |
||
| 03/20/2025 | Commercial Mechanical Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | March 17, 2025 1st Review ASI Architects Attn: Phillip Veneziano 5931 E. Pima Street Tucson, Arizona 85712 Re: KOCH WAREHOUSE NEW BUILDING City of Tucson Permit Number: TC-COM-0325-00482 Stantec Project Number: 185215066 Stantec File Number: TUC-25-034 Plan review for the above referenced project has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. PLEASE send all response to comments back to the City through the permit portal! Responses sent directly to Stantec will be ignored. Also, please submit complete copies of all permit documents (i.e. plans, calculations, reports, etc.) even if they have not been changed. Please cloud and delta all changes and provide a letter with a written response to each of the comments indicating the action taken. The scope of this review covers the architectural, structural, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical designs as they relate to the codes adopted by the jurisdiction. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. Occupancy Group Construction Type Area (Square feet) Occupant Load Automatic Fire Sprinklers Fire Alarms S-1 V-B 5,000 10 No No Separate Permits: None. Deferred Submittals: Pre-engineered metal building. Special Inspections: Earthwork, concrete, and high-strength bolts. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS Sheet G1.0 1. Please clarify what will be stored in the proposed warehouse to classify as the Group S-1 occupancy stated. Please also be sure to include if high-piled storage will apply to this project as well. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 311.2 & 910.2.2] {I noticed the structural calculations included the name “More Than A Bed”. Is this space intended to be furniture storage? 2. Note on the cover of the drawings that special inspection is required for earthwork, concrete, high-strength bolts. Also, provide City of Tucson special inspection certificate(s) with Parts A and B completed. Make sure that the owner or their legal representative signs the form. {Please see the structural comment and coordinate accordingly.} 3. Please provide plumbing fixture calculations for the proposed warehouse. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 2902] Sheet SP1.0 1. The ‘Keynotes’ section that appears to pertain to the site plan on this sheet are not referenced on the actual site plan. Please revise. 2. The east wall of the building indicates 6’ from the property line. The wall is required to be 1-hour fire resistance rated for exposure from both sides of the wall. This also includes the steel columns supporting this exterior wall. Please provide the listed rated assembly numbers and details to achieve the required fire resistance rating. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 602, 705.5, 705.6] 3. Please provide on the site plan the rim elevation of manhole #920609 and include a back water valve if the elevation is over 2,348. [Ref. IPC 2018 Sec. 714.1] Sheet A1.0 1. The proposed warehouse does not meet the required 4% natural ventilation with openings. Please revise. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 1202.5.1] 2. Please provide a service sink for the structure. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 2902] 3. The cross section on this sheet calls out details 1 & 3 on sheet S1.0. Sheet S1.0 does not include these details. Please clarify. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS Sheet S1.0 1. The special inspections section on this sheet indicates special inspections for concrete, soils, and steel construction. The soils and concrete special inspections are not required due to the 2,500psi strength design and the assumed 1500psf soil bearing design. Do you still want these special inspections performed? If so, please coordinate with the applicant/architect and provide City of Tucson special inspection certificate(s) with Parts A and B completed. Make sure that the owner or their legal representative signs the form. If not, please remove these special inspections. MECHANICAL COMMENTS There are no comments. PLUMBING COMMENTS Sheet P1.0 1. Please provide a calculation for the water pressure drop from the service to the last remote fixture having the most demanding pressure. [Ref. IPC 2018 Sec. 604] ELECTRICAL COMMENTS General 1. Please provide a statement that special inspection is required (or is not required) per Sec. 104.2.2 of the 2012 City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. 2. Please provide short circuit current calculations for the proposed electrical design. [Ref. NEC 2017 Art. 110] Sheet E1.0 1. The interior lighting energy calculations are designed to the 2012 International Energy Code. Please revise to meet the 2018 International Energy Code as adopted by the City of Tucson. 2. The electrical design is conflicting. The one-line and panel schedule indicate this to be a single-phase system, but the voltage is indicated as 120/208 which would refer to a three-phase system. If this is a single-phase 400-amp service, then the voltage should be 120/240. Please revise accordingly and be sure to update the load calculations as well. Should you have any questions regarding the plan review comments, please contact the plan reviewer listed for the appropriate discipline. Plans reviewed by: Trevor Bies, Senior Plan Reviewer 602-338-9922 trevor.bies@stantec.com |
||
| 03/20/2025 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | March 17, 2025 1st Review ASI Architects Attn: Phillip Veneziano 5931 E. Pima Street Tucson, Arizona 85712 Re: KOCH WAREHOUSE NEW BUILDING City of Tucson Permit Number: TC-COM-0325-00482 Stantec Project Number: 185215066 Stantec File Number: TUC-25-034 Plan review for the above referenced project has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. PLEASE send all response to comments back to the City through the permit portal! Responses sent directly to Stantec will be ignored. Also, please submit complete copies of all permit documents (i.e. plans, calculations, reports, etc.) even if they have not been changed. Please cloud and delta all changes and provide a letter with a written response to each of the comments indicating the action taken. The scope of this review covers the architectural, structural, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical designs as they relate to the codes adopted by the jurisdiction. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. Occupancy Group Construction Type Area (Square feet) Occupant Load Automatic Fire Sprinklers Fire Alarms S-1 V-B 5,000 10 No No Separate Permits: None. Deferred Submittals: Pre-engineered metal building. Special Inspections: Earthwork, concrete, and high-strength bolts. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS Sheet G1.0 1. Please clarify what will be stored in the proposed warehouse to classify as the Group S-1 occupancy stated. Please also be sure to include if high-piled storage will apply to this project as well. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 311.2 & 910.2.2] {I noticed the structural calculations included the name “More Than A Bed”. Is this space intended to be furniture storage? 2. Note on the cover of the drawings that special inspection is required for earthwork, concrete, high-strength bolts. Also, provide City of Tucson special inspection certificate(s) with Parts A and B completed. Make sure that the owner or their legal representative signs the form. {Please see the structural comment and coordinate accordingly.} 3. Please provide plumbing fixture calculations for the proposed warehouse. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 2902] Sheet SP1.0 1. The ‘Keynotes’ section that appears to pertain to the site plan on this sheet are not referenced on the actual site plan. Please revise. 2. The east wall of the building indicates 6’ from the property line. The wall is required to be 1-hour fire resistance rated for exposure from both sides of the wall. This also includes the steel columns supporting this exterior wall. Please provide the listed rated assembly numbers and details to achieve the required fire resistance rating. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 602, 705.5, 705.6] 3. Please provide on the site plan the rim elevation of manhole #920609 and include a back water valve if the elevation is over 2,348. [Ref. IPC 2018 Sec. 714.1] Sheet A1.0 1. The proposed warehouse does not meet the required 4% natural ventilation with openings. Please revise. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 1202.5.1] 2. Please provide a service sink for the structure. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 2902] 3. The cross section on this sheet calls out details 1 & 3 on sheet S1.0. Sheet S1.0 does not include these details. Please clarify. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS Sheet S1.0 1. The special inspections section on this sheet indicates special inspections for concrete, soils, and steel construction. The soils and concrete special inspections are not required due to the 2,500psi strength design and the assumed 1500psf soil bearing design. Do you still want these special inspections performed? If so, please coordinate with the applicant/architect and provide City of Tucson special inspection certificate(s) with Parts A and B completed. Make sure that the owner or their legal representative signs the form. If not, please remove these special inspections. MECHANICAL COMMENTS There are no comments. PLUMBING COMMENTS Sheet P1.0 1. Please provide a calculation for the water pressure drop from the service to the last remote fixture having the most demanding pressure. [Ref. IPC 2018 Sec. 604] ELECTRICAL COMMENTS General 1. Please provide a statement that special inspection is required (or is not required) per Sec. 104.2.2 of the 2012 City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. 2. Please provide short circuit current calculations for the proposed electrical design. [Ref. NEC 2017 Art. 110] Sheet E1.0 1. The interior lighting energy calculations are designed to the 2012 International Energy Code. Please revise to meet the 2018 International Energy Code as adopted by the City of Tucson. 2. The electrical design is conflicting. The one-line and panel schedule indicate this to be a single-phase system, but the voltage is indicated as 120/208 which would refer to a three-phase system. If this is a single-phase 400-amp service, then the voltage should be 120/240. Please revise accordingly and be sure to update the load calculations as well. Should you have any questions regarding the plan review comments, please contact the plan reviewer listed for the appropriate discipline. Plans reviewed by: Trevor Bies, Senior Plan Reviewer 602-338-9922 trevor.bies@stantec.com |
||
| 03/20/2025 | Outdoor Lighting Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | March 17, 2025 1st Review ASI Architects Attn: Phillip Veneziano 5931 E. Pima Street Tucson, Arizona 85712 Re: KOCH WAREHOUSE NEW BUILDING City of Tucson Permit Number: TC-COM-0325-00482 Stantec Project Number: 185215066 Stantec File Number: TUC-25-034 Plan review for the above referenced project has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. PLEASE send all response to comments back to the City through the permit portal! Responses sent directly to Stantec will be ignored. Also, please submit complete copies of all permit documents (i.e. plans, calculations, reports, etc.) even if they have not been changed. Please cloud and delta all changes and provide a letter with a written response to each of the comments indicating the action taken. The scope of this review covers the architectural, structural, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical designs as they relate to the codes adopted by the jurisdiction. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. Occupancy Group Construction Type Area (Square feet) Occupant Load Automatic Fire Sprinklers Fire Alarms S-1 V-B 5,000 10 No No Separate Permits: None. Deferred Submittals: Pre-engineered metal building. Special Inspections: Earthwork, concrete, and high-strength bolts. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS Sheet G1.0 1. Please clarify what will be stored in the proposed warehouse to classify as the Group S-1 occupancy stated. Please also be sure to include if high-piled storage will apply to this project as well. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 311.2 & 910.2.2] {I noticed the structural calculations included the name “More Than A Bed”. Is this space intended to be furniture storage? 2. Note on the cover of the drawings that special inspection is required for earthwork, concrete, high-strength bolts. Also, provide City of Tucson special inspection certificate(s) with Parts A and B completed. Make sure that the owner or their legal representative signs the form. {Please see the structural comment and coordinate accordingly.} 3. Please provide plumbing fixture calculations for the proposed warehouse. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 2902] Sheet SP1.0 1. The ‘Keynotes’ section that appears to pertain to the site plan on this sheet are not referenced on the actual site plan. Please revise. 2. The east wall of the building indicates 6’ from the property line. The wall is required to be 1-hour fire resistance rated for exposure from both sides of the wall. This also includes the steel columns supporting this exterior wall. Please provide the listed rated assembly numbers and details to achieve the required fire resistance rating. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 602, 705.5, 705.6] 3. Please provide on the site plan the rim elevation of manhole #920609 and include a back water valve if the elevation is over 2,348. [Ref. IPC 2018 Sec. 714.1] Sheet A1.0 1. The proposed warehouse does not meet the required 4% natural ventilation with openings. Please revise. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 1202.5.1] 2. Please provide a service sink for the structure. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 2902] 3. The cross section on this sheet calls out details 1 & 3 on sheet S1.0. Sheet S1.0 does not include these details. Please clarify. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS Sheet S1.0 1. The special inspections section on this sheet indicates special inspections for concrete, soils, and steel construction. The soils and concrete special inspections are not required due to the 2,500psi strength design and the assumed 1500psf soil bearing design. Do you still want these special inspections performed? If so, please coordinate with the applicant/architect and provide City of Tucson special inspection certificate(s) with Parts A and B completed. Make sure that the owner or their legal representative signs the form. If not, please remove these special inspections. MECHANICAL COMMENTS There are no comments. PLUMBING COMMENTS Sheet P1.0 1. Please provide a calculation for the water pressure drop from the service to the last remote fixture having the most demanding pressure. [Ref. IPC 2018 Sec. 604] ELECTRICAL COMMENTS General 1. Please provide a statement that special inspection is required (or is not required) per Sec. 104.2.2 of the 2012 City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. 2. Please provide short circuit current calculations for the proposed electrical design. [Ref. NEC 2017 Art. 110] Sheet E1.0 1. The interior lighting energy calculations are designed to the 2012 International Energy Code. Please revise to meet the 2018 International Energy Code as adopted by the City of Tucson. 2. The electrical design is conflicting. The one-line and panel schedule indicate this to be a single-phase system, but the voltage is indicated as 120/208 which would refer to a three-phase system. If this is a single-phase 400-amp service, then the voltage should be 120/240. Please revise accordingly and be sure to update the load calculations as well. Should you have any questions regarding the plan review comments, please contact the plan reviewer listed for the appropriate discipline. Plans reviewed by: Trevor Bies, Senior Plan Reviewer 602-338-9922 trevor.bies@stantec.com |
||
| 04/04/2025 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See zoning comments | ||
| 03/31/2025 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | FROM: PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-COM-0325-00482 523 E GAY ST. - C-2 Commercial Storage (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 31, 2025 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in the C-2 zone (UDC 4.7.21). Commercial Storage is an approved use in the zone (UDC Table 4.8-4), subject to Use Specific Standard 4.9.10.A. 1. Per UDC Article 3.3.3.G.2.c A site plan (Development Package) is required for the following types of development: Existing development undergoing a change of use, building structure additions, and/or a reconfiguration of an area outside a building. A Development Package (DP) meeting the requirements of Administrative Manual (AM) 2-06 must be submitted and approved prior to approval of this building plan. The Administrative Manual can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes-and-Plans/Zoning-Code#section-1. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 03/26/2025 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/13/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |