Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0324-00462
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/17/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/02/2024 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer Nicholas Baptiste njnobaptiste@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 3/29/2024 11:15:12 AM 1. General / Information Required. Provide components and cladding design wind pressures for roof, wall, and parapet surfaces. 2. Sheet S1.5 (Standard Details) / Clarification. Detail 48 states "See single plate connection schedule on detail 33/S1.6". Revise note to state accurate reference detail. 3. Sheet S3.0 (First Floor Wall and Second Floor Framing Plan) / Clarification. C12x20.7 beam label is depicted between grids P and Q outside of the structure. Clarify if C channel is required and where. 4. Sheet S3.2 (Roof Framing Plan) / Clarification. At stair near Grid 1 plan depicts callout for 51/S1.2. Revise note to depict accurate reference detail. 5. Sheet S5.0 (Framing Details) / Clarification. Detail 307, Note 4 states "Purlin to stud per 304/S4.5". Revise note to state accurate reference detail. Building(B) Reviewer Keith Miller kmiller@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 3/19/2024 4:30:51 PM 1. General: The architect’s seals include a future date as the date signed. 2. Sheet A0.10: Include the calculations for the number of accessible units. (2018 IBC section 1108.3) 3. Sheet A9.10: Details #8 incorrectly shows the measurement of the stair treads. The tread depth is to be measured from the nosing to the vertical plane of the nosing of the adjacent tread. (2018 IBC section 1011.5.2) 4. Sheet A9.10: The openings in guards of 4” or more are prohibited. Include the landing guard details. (2018 IBC section 1015.4) Mechanical(M) Reviewer Jorge Valido jvalido@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 3/29/2024 11:49:52 PM Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 3/25/2024 5:09:32 PM 1. Tucson city requires an outdoor lumens calculation in leu of an exterior lighting comcheck. Provide calculation. Below is web address for Worksheet: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/permits/residentialpermits/outdoor_lighting_calculation.pdf Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 3/31/2024 7:05:36 PM First Plumbing Review: 1). General: The architect’s seals are dated for 2025 on various pages. Designers seal date needs to be current date 2). Sheet P1.1: Water piping to hose bib need a shut off. Add a shut off valve on the branch to the hose bib according to - 2018 IPC 606.2 |
||
| 04/16/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The building permit cannot be approved until the associated development package, TD-DEV-0923-00393, has been approved. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/16/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-COM-0324-00462 - TD-DEV-0923-00393 8800 E SPEEDWAY BL – C-2 Personal Storage (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: April 16, 2024 Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in the C-2 zone (UDC 4.7.21). Personal Storage is an allowed use in the zone (UDC Table 4.8-4), subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.10.C.3 & .6. 1. The development package sheets provided in the building plan set either need to be the stamped approved plans, marked for reference only, or removed from the building set. If you elect to mark for reference only do not mark the utility plans and if you elect to remove the plans leave the utility plans in the so Plumbing can review. 2. There are numerous details on the site detail sheets, i.e. accessible parking signage, enlarged accessible access path, etc. that do not match what is shown on the Development Package. All site details should match. 3. Building height is a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the flat roof, see UDC Article 6.4.4.A. As a dimension was not provided Zoning cannot verify the proposed height of the building. Also, under General Note 17 shown on sheet 1 of the development package the proposed height is 14’ but this building plan shows the top of parapet at 27’. 4. The zoning listed under Site and Building Data is not correct and should show C-2. 5. The vehicle parking space calculation provided under Site and Building Data is not correct and should match what is shown on the DP. 6. The Total Gross Building Area shown under Building Area, 99,842 SF, does not match what is shown on the DP, General Note 25, 50,142 SF, clarify which is correct and the plans should match. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 04/17/2024 | Water - PDSD | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Coordinate the size of the domestic water to the building. The civil utility plan, C6 ( private water keynote #8), calls for a 1” domestic water service line but the plumbing drawing, P1.1, shows a 1-1/4” water service to serve the building. | ||
| 04/05/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/16/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |