Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: HAST - COMMERCIAL NEW ADD/ALT FAST TRACK v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0225-00403
Review Name: HAST - COMMERCIAL NEW ADD/ALT FAST TRACK v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/17/2025 | Water - PDSD | APPROVED | |||
| 03/24/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/17/2025 | Commercial Building | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer Madeline Nelson mnelson@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 3/17/2025 9:50:07 PM Building(B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 3/13/2025 6:48:57 PM 1. Sheet A0.31a/Occupancy Load Calculation: There is a space adjacent to exit stairs that has not been accounted for in the occupant load calculation. The idea of an unoccupied accessory space is not recognized by the adopted codes. "Accessory spaces" are not permitted to be omitted from these calculations. Update the occupant load calculation in accordance with 2018 IBC Section 1004.3 and Table 1004.5. 2. Sheet A0.31c/Occupancy Load Calculation: There is a space adjacent to exit stairs that has not been accounted for in the occupant load calculation. The idea of an unoccupied accessory space is not recognized by the adopted codes. "Accessory spaces" are not permitted to be omitted from these calculations. Update the occupant load calculation in accordance with 2018 IBC Section 1004.3 and Table 1004.5. 3. Sheet A2.05/Roof Access: It doesn't appear that there is access to the roof. Provide clarification or access to the roof in accordance with 2018 IBC Section 1011.12. 4. General: It appears that no hoistway protection has been provided. Provide hoistway protection in accordance with 2018 IBC Section 3006.2.1. |
||
| 03/17/2025 | Commercial Electrical | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 3/13/2025 12:19:32 PM 1. E3.01 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING-FIRST FLOOR PLAN-OVERALL: No lights shown 2. E4.15c ELECTRICAL POWER - ROOF PLAN - SOUTH WING: Could not locate Flag Notes 2 and 6. 3. E8.00 ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE RISER DIAGRAM: Comment only, feeder to SES#1 from utility transformer is generously oversized (5000 amps) for a 3000 amp switchboard. Suggest to call out for this feeder to be determined by the Utility company as it is their feeder and does not have to comply with NEC requirements. FYI The utility company will size based upon their typically undersized transformer and often call out for 50% neutrals to be installed by the electrical contractor. The feeders selected by the utility will be large enough and if not, the power company will correct. 4. E8.01 ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE RISER DIAGRAM: Comment only, feeder to SES#2 from utility transformer is generously oversized (3700 amps) for a 2500 amp switchboard. Suggest to call out for this feeder to be determined by the Utility company as it is their feeder and does not have to comply with NEC requirements. 5. E8.03 ELECTRICAL CALCULATIONS: all calculations for Available Fault Currents are wrong. Calculation for ‘f or f1’ are missing calculation value of 1.732 [sqrt(3)]. Should correct. However, not critical because this error leads to a more conservative (more costly) design. 6. E8.04 ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULES: Incomplete loads shown on SES 1 and 2. Should include meter stack calculated loads in panels. 1-pole poles shown on SES-1 are in error and should be corrected. Shall call out sizes of SES Boards. 7. E8.05 ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULES: Suggest using #10 or even #8 conductors for EV feeders. Might also consider upsizing some/all CBs for better output. Current design may result in numerous tripped circuit breakers as most EV cars draw 32 amps from level 2 chargers as the cars default setting. |
||
| 03/17/2025 | Commercial Mechanical | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Mechanical(M) Reviewer Jorge Valido jvalido@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 3/17/2025 12:54:43 PM 1. General - Provide on the SPLIT SYSTEM FAN COIL UNIT SCHEDULE or the SPLIT SYSTEM CONDENSING UNIT SCHEDULE the type of refrigerant being used. A2L type refrigerants require ASHRAE 15 calculations for each type design using A2L type refrigerants. Refrigerant shafts vented (naturally or mechanically) may be required when routing refrigerant lines through floors. Monitoring systems with alarm may also be required. - 1109.3 Installation requirements for A2L and B2L refrigerants. 1109.2.5 Refrigerant pipe shafts. 1109.3.2 Shaft ventilation. 1109.2.4 Piping in concrete floors. 1109.5 Refrigerant pipe penetrations .1109.8.1 Refrigerating systems containing more than 6.6 pounds (3.0 kg) of refrigerant. 1109.3.3 Pipe identification. 1109.3.1 Pipe protection. ASHRAE 15 and Table 4-1. Table 4-2 Data and Safety Classifications for Refrigerant Blends Refrigerant Data and Safety Classifications ASHRAE 34. - 2018 IMC - 2018 IECC Section C103.2Information on construction documents. - 2018 IBC Section [A]107.2.1Information on construction documents. 2. General - Provide Makeup Air for all Laundry Room areas. - 2018 IMC Section 504.6 Makeup air. 3. General - Provide COMcheck Mechanical Compliance Certificate. Any other APPROVED certifying agency is acceptable. - 2018 IECC Section C403.3.2 HVAC equipment performance requirements. 4. General - Provide Heat Load Calculations for each different design system. Include all O/A loads in calculations. - 2018 IECC Section C403.1.1 Calculation of heating and cooling loads. 5. Plan Sheet M4.01 - Supply grill is tagged 6" CD-1 300 CFM. This would make total CFM for corridor unit FCU-13.X 1000 CFM of Air Flow. Plan Sheet M2.00 shows for Air Flow for FCU-13.X 800 CFM total Air Flow. Confirm CFM at the supply grills for FCU13.X. - 2018 IECC Section C103.2Information on construction documents. - 2018 IBC Section [A]107.2.1Information on construction documents. 6. Plan Sheet M700 - Detail #4 shows condensate line dumping into a sanitary line. This is not industry standards. Provide approval from the AHJ for this type of routing. - 307.2.1 Condensate disposal. |
||
| 03/17/2025 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 3/16/2025 11:07:01 AM First Plan review: 1). Plan Pages A2.43 (abc): Plan pages missing secondary scupper locations. Add adjacent #276 secondary scupper locations to the three roof plan pages- -2018 IPC 106.3.1, 1106.5, 1108 2). Plan Page A0.11: Missing plan pages P6.00, P6.01, & P6.02, P9.00 on sheet index. Add plan pages P6.00, P6.01, & P6.02, P9.00 to sheet index A0.11 -2018 IPC 106.3.1 3). Plan pages P5.00, P5.01, P6.00, P6.01, P6.02: Laundry room & unit washer box details show the sanitary piping undersized. Upsize the laundry room horizontal Bldg. drains to 3". -2018 IPC 406.2 (update all affected pages) 4). Plan pages P5.01 & P6.02: Laundry room sanitary drain needs to discharge to a Lint interceptor. Update the plans with the required lint interceptor illustrations & information. - 2018 IPC 1003.6 5). Plan Pages P4.11a, P4.11b, P4.11c, P4.14b, P4.14c, P4.15a, P4.15b, P4.15c: Hose Bibs missing shutoff valves. Add the required hose bib shut off valves. -2018 IPC 606.2 6). Plan Page P.3.01 : Lint interceptor needs to be vented. Add the required interceptor vent. -2018 IPC 1003.9 7). Plan page P4.01a: Missing the total DFU load. Add the total DFU load notation at the bldg drain exit & the 2 points of interconnection before the bldg drain exit. -2018 IPC 710 |
||
| 03/17/2025 | Outdoor Lighting | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 3/13/2025 12:19:32 PM 1. E3.01 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING-FIRST FLOOR PLAN-OVERALL: No lights shown 2. E4.15c ELECTRICAL POWER - ROOF PLAN - SOUTH WING: Could not locate Flag Notes 2 and 6. 3. E8.00 ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE RISER DIAGRAM: Comment only, feeder to SES#1 from utility transformer is generously oversized (5000 amps) for a 3000 amp switchboard. Suggest to call out for this feeder to be determined by the Utility company as it is their feeder and does not have to comply with NEC requirements. FYI The utility company will size based upon their typically undersized transformer and often call out for 50% neutrals to be installed by the electrical contractor. The feeders selected by the utility will be large enough and if not, the power company will correct. 4. E8.01 ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE RISER DIAGRAM: Comment only, feeder to SES#2 from utility transformer is generously oversized (3700 amps) for a 2500 amp switchboard. Suggest to call out for this feeder to be determined by the Utility company as it is their feeder and does not have to comply with NEC requirements. 5. E8.03 ELECTRICAL CALCULATIONS: all calculations for Available Fault Currents are wrong. Calculation for ‘f or f1’ are missing calculation value of 1.732 [sqrt(3)]. Should correct. However, not critical because this error leads to a more conservative (more costly) design. 6. E8.04 ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULES: Incomplete loads shown on SES 1 and 2. Should include meter stack calculated loads in panels. 1-pole poles shown on SES-1 are in error and should be corrected. Shall call out sizes of SES Boards. 7. E8.05 ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULES: Suggest using #10 or even #8 conductors for EV feeders. Might also consider upsizing some/all CBs for better output. Current design may result in numerous tripped circuit breakers as most EV cars draw 32 amps from level 2 chargers as the cars default setting. |
||
| 03/24/2025 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Resubmit after approval of Development Package TD-DEV-1224-00334. Joshua Garcia joshua.garcia@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/14/2025 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | FROM: PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-COM-0225-00403 - TD-DEV-1224-00334 860 E IRVINGTON RD. - R-2/C-2 Multifamily - Affordable Housing (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 14, 2025 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in the R-2/C-2 zones (R-2 - UDC 4.7.9 & C-2 - UDC 4.7.21). Multifamily is an allowed use in both zones (UDC Tables, R-2 - 4.8-2 & C-2 – 4.8-4) Subject to Use Specific Standards in the R-2 - 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10, no Use Specific Standards apply in the C-2 zone. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building permit for compliance with development package (DP) TD-DEV-1224-00334 and although it appears that the building plan is in compliance until the DP is approved by all review agencies Zoning cannot approve this plan. 2. Provide a unit breakdown on the plan that provides the number of each unit type with the square footage so that Impact Fee requirements can be determined. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 03/20/2025 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/03/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |