Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: HAST - COMMERCIAL NEW ADD/ALT FAST TRACK v.2
Permit Number - TC-COM-0225-00403
Review Name: HAST - COMMERCIAL NEW ADD/ALT FAST TRACK v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/15/2025 | Commercial Building | APPROVED | |||
| 04/15/2025 | Commercial Mechanical | APPROVED | |||
| 04/15/2025 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 04/19/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/15/2025 | Commercial Electrical | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. E3.01 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING-FIRST FLOOR PLAN-OVERALL: No lights shown Addressed 2. E4.15c ELECTRICAL POWER - ROOF PLAN - SOUTH WING: Could not locate Flag Notes 2 and 6. Addressed 3. E8.00 ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE RISER DIAGRAM: Comment only, feeder to SES#1 from utility transformer is generously oversized (5000 amps) for a 3000 amp switchboard. Suggest to call out for this feeder to be determined by the Utility company as it is their feeder and does not have to comply with NEC requirements. FYI The utility company will size based upon their typically undersized transformer and often call out for 50% neutrals to be installed by the electrical contractor. The feeders selected by the utility will be large enough and if not, the power company will correct. Addressed 4. E8.01 ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE RISER DIAGRAM: Comment only, feeder to SES#2 from utility transformer is generously oversized (3700 amps) for a 2500 amp switchboard. Suggest to call out for this feeder to be determined by the Utility company as it is their feeder and does not have to comply with NEC requirements. Addressed 5. E8.03 ELECTRICAL CALCULATIONS: all calculations for Available Fault Currents are wrong. Calculation for ‘f or f1’ are missing calculation value of 1.732 [sqrt(3)]. Should correct. However, not critical because this error leads to a more conservative (more costly) design. Addressed by comment response. 6. E8.04 ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULES: Incomplete loads shown on SES 1 and 2. Should include meter stack calculated loads in panels. 1-pole poles shown on SES-1 are in error and should be corrected. Shall call out sizes of SES Boards. Addressed 7. E8.05 ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULES: Suggest using #10 or even #8 conductors for EV feeders. Might also consider upsizing some/all CBs for better output. Current design may result in numerous tripped circuit breakers as most EV cars draw 32 amps from level 2 chargers as the cars default setting. Addressed by comment response. 8. Added New Comment: E2.01 Mechanical Schedule has unreadable columns for HP, KW, and KVA. Also has some MCA, MOC, and VA columns covered as well. Need to correct as it cannot be determined for compliance with NEC requirements on all of the equipment with current Connection Schedule as shown. 9. Added New Comment: E8.00 transformers T1 and T2 are not typical sizes nor are they shown on Transformer Feeder Schedule on E8.02. Therefore, the information needs to be called out for secondary voltage and feeder sizes. Disconnects for Elevators should be called out. Final design needs to comply with NEC table 450.3(b). Why were transformers T1 and T2 used? To provided 480V for elevators? 10. Added New Comment: E8.08 panel loads are no longer readable. |
||
| 04/15/2025 | Outdoor Lighting | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. E3.01 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING-FIRST FLOOR PLAN-OVERALL: No lights shown Addressed 2. E4.15c ELECTRICAL POWER - ROOF PLAN - SOUTH WING: Could not locate Flag Notes 2 and 6. Addressed 3. E8.00 ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE RISER DIAGRAM: Comment only, feeder to SES#1 from utility transformer is generously oversized (5000 amps) for a 3000 amp switchboard. Suggest to call out for this feeder to be determined by the Utility company as it is their feeder and does not have to comply with NEC requirements. FYI The utility company will size based upon their typically undersized transformer and often call out for 50% neutrals to be installed by the electrical contractor. The feeders selected by the utility will be large enough and if not, the power company will correct. Addressed 4. E8.01 ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE RISER DIAGRAM: Comment only, feeder to SES#2 from utility transformer is generously oversized (3700 amps) for a 2500 amp switchboard. Suggest to call out for this feeder to be determined by the Utility company as it is their feeder and does not have to comply with NEC requirements. Addressed 5. E8.03 ELECTRICAL CALCULATIONS: all calculations for Available Fault Currents are wrong. Calculation for ‘f or f1’ are missing calculation value of 1.732 [sqrt(3)]. Should correct. However, not critical because this error leads to a more conservative (more costly) design. Addressed by comment response. 6. E8.04 ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULES: Incomplete loads shown on SES 1 and 2. Should include meter stack calculated loads in panels. 1-pole poles shown on SES-1 are in error and should be corrected. Shall call out sizes of SES Boards. Addressed 7. E8.05 ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULES: Suggest using #10 or even #8 conductors for EV feeders. Might also consider upsizing some/all CBs for better output. Current design may result in numerous tripped circuit breakers as most EV cars draw 32 amps from level 2 chargers as the cars default setting. Addressed by comment response. 8. Added New Comment: E2.01 Mechanical Schedule has unreadable columns for HP, KW, and KVA. Also has some MCA, MOC, and VA columns covered as well. Need to correct as it cannot be determined for compliance with NEC requirements on all of the equipment with current Connection Schedule as shown. 9. Added New Comment: E8.00 transformers T1 and T2 are not typical sizes nor are they shown on Transformer Feeder Schedule on E8.02. Therefore, the information needs to be called out for secondary voltage and feeder sizes. Disconnects for Elevators should be called out. Final design needs to comply with NEC table 450.3(b). Why were transformers T1 and T2 used? To provided 480V for elevators? 10. Added New Comment: E8.08 panel loads are no longer readable. |
||
| 04/19/2025 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Resubmit after approval of Development Package TD-DEV-1224-00334. Joshua Garcia joshua.garcia@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/04/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/18/2025 | Site Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | FROM: PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-COM-0225-00403 - TD-DEV-1224-00334 860 E IRVINGTON RD. - R-2/C-2 Multifamily - Affordable Housing (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 18, 2025 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in the R-2/C-2 zones (R-2 - UDC 4.7.9 & C-2 - UDC 4.7.21). Multifamily is an allowed use in both zones (UDC Tables, R-2 - 4.8-2 & C-2 – 4.8-4) Subject to Use Specific Standards in the R-2 - 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10, no Use Specific Standards apply in the C-2 zone. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building permit for compliance with development package (DP) TD-DEV-1224-00334 and although it appears that the building plan is in compliance until the DP is approved by all review agencies Zoning cannot approve this plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |