Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0124-00185
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/27/2024 | Site Engineering | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 02/27/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 02/14/2024 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer Madeline Nelson mnelson@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 2/13/2024 8:12:38 PM Building(B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 2/5/2024 11:03:30 PM 1. Sheet C1 (Grading and New Parking Plan): Accessible parking for the new location has not been provided. Provide accessible parking in accordance with 2010 ADAAG Section 208. 2. General: No accessible vehicular signage has been provided. Provide all detailed vehicle signage location, mounting heights and graphic details for the vehicular signage in accordance with 2010 ADAAG Section 502.6. 3. Sheet A0.0 (Egress Plan): The egress plan provides occupant load calculations, however, the rooms are not labeled accordingly. Provide rooms that are properly labeled. 4. Sheet A2.0 (Floor Plan): At least 5% of each type of locker is required to be accessible. Provide the proper number of accessible lockers in accordance with the 2010 ADA Section 222.1. 5. Sheet A2.0 (Floor Plan): Benches are required to be provided in lockers rooms that comply with Section 903 (2010 ADA) in accordance with the 2010 ADAD Section 803.4. Mechanical(M) Reviewer Jorge Valido jvalido@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 2/12/2024 7:08:32 PM Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 2/8/2024 10:17:33 AM Electrical Review of TAA Police By: Ron Ross PE E.4 LIGHTING DEMO PLAN: Missing Keynotes or Keynote layer is inadvertently on. E.5 LIGHTING NEW WORK PLAN: Should call out that devices are identified/noted on sheet E.7 E.6 ELECTRICAL DETAILS: Need to clarify/coordinate One Line Diagram with Enlarged Electrical Room details. Cannot determine demo of xfmr ‘FPE’ (per demo note) with xfmr ‘T1’. Should call out size and type of transformer to be replaced. Enlarged Electrical Rooms indicate the ‘FPE’ is a lighting contactor. Confirm 100-amp CB on primary in Dist Panel ‘DP’ is sufficient for new transformer. If upsized, identify new conductors where used. Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 2/11/2024 10:32:03 PM First Plumbing Review: 1). The gas plan on plan page P.4 doesn't correlate with water piping system & the mechanical plans.( Mechanical plan doesn't show any gas RTU's & the plumbing water piping pages only show 1 electric water heater not 2 gas WH's ?-2018 IPC 106.3.1 |
||
| 02/16/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-COM-0124-00185 7150 S TUCSON BL – MU Airport Authority (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: February 16, 2024 Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in the MU zone (UDC 4.7.23). Airport Authority is a allowed use in the zone (UDC Table 4.8-7), subject to Use Specific Standard 4.9.13.Q.5. 1. As you are adding parking and structures to the site per UDC Article 3.3.3.G.2.c A site plan (Development Package) is required for the following types of development: Existing development undergoing a change of use, building structure additions, and/or a reconfiguration of an area outside a building. A development package (DP) meeting the requirements of the Checklist for Minor Changes to Commercial/Industrial Sites is required to be submitted and approved. The DP is a separate submittal from the building plans. The checklist can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/permits/minor_changes_to_commercial_industrial_sites_.pdf. A development package is a separate submittal and must be submitted and approved prior to approval of this plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 02/16/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/30/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |