Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Permit Number - TC-COM-0124-00185
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/29/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 05/06/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-COM-0124-00185 7150 S TUCSON BL – MU Airport Authority (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL: May 6, 2024 This comment was not addressed. Resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in the MU zone (UDC 4.7.23). Airport Authority is a allowed use in the zone (UDC Table 4.8-7), subject to Use Specific Standard 4.9.13.Q.5. 1. This comment was not addressed. As you are adding parking and structures to the site per UDC Article 3.3.3.G.2.c A site plan (Development Package) is required for the following types of development: Existing development undergoing a change of use, building structure additions, and/or a reconfiguration of an area outside a building. A development package (DP) meeting the requirements of the Checklist for Minor Changes to Commercial/Industrial Sites is required to be submitted and approved. The DP is a separate submittal from the building plans. The checklist can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/permits/minor_changes_to_commercial_industrial_sites_.pdf. A development package is a separate submittal and must be submitted and approved prior to approval of this plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 05/29/2024 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REVIEW COMPLETED | Structural(S) Reviewer Madeline Nelson mnelson@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 2/13/2024 8:12:38 PM Building(B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 5/28/2024 10:27:03 AM Mechanical(M) Reviewer Jorge Valido jvalido@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 2/12/2024 7:08:32 PM Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 5/24/2024 3:05:14 PM 1. E.4 LIGHTING DEMO PLAN: Missing Keynotes or Keynote layer is inadvertently on. Resolved 2. E.5 LIGHTING NEW WORK PLAN: Should call out that devices are identified/noted on sheet E.7 Resolved 3. E.6 ELECTRICAL DETAILS: Need to clarify/coordinate One Line Diagram with Enlarged Electrical Room details. Cannot determine demo of xfmr ‘FPE’ (per demo note) with xfmr ‘T1’. Should call out size and type of transformer to be replaced. Enlarged Electrical Rooms indicate the ‘FPE’ is a lighting contactor. Resolved 4. E.6 ELECTRICAL DETAILS: Confirm 100-amp CB on primary in Dist Panel ‘DP’ is sufficient for new transformer. If upsized, identify new conductors where used. Resolved Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Approved with Comments Reason: Date Completed : 5/27/2024 11:40:58 PM Second Plumbing Review: OK Subject to Field inspections Resolved_1). The gas plan on plan page P.4 doesn't correlate with water piping system & the mechanical plans.( Mechanical plan doesn't show any gas RTU's & the plumbing water piping pages only show 1 electric water heater not 2 gas WH's ?- 2018 IPC 106.3.1 |
||
| 04/08/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |