Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0123-00558
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/03/2023 | Site Zoning | APPROVED | |||
| 03/07/2023 | Site Engineering | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 03/11/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/11/2023 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Activity Number: TC-COM-0123-00558 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved NOTE: Every effort has been made to identify the code violations. Any oversight by the review team shall not be considered an authority to violate, set aside, cancel or alter applicable codes or ordinances. The plan review and permit issuance shall not be considered a warranty or guarantee. The Structural Engineer is responsible for following ALL applicable Federal, State and local Municipal Codes and Ordinances. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. At least 5% of the dining surfaces are required to have mobility features. Provide calculations of the required amount of accessible seating and indicate the locations. Additionally, ensure that surfaces are properly dispersed throughout the structure. Section 226.1 and 226.2 of the 2010 ADAAG. 2. No egress plans have been provide. Provide detailed and thorough egress plans. 3. The plans indicate a 4 hour separation provided for the linking of these two structures. However, wall type provided for these separations doesn't appear to meet this rating. Provide a UL listed assembly to match the required rating. 4. To not include the proposed structure into the allowable area of the other buildings, a fire wall will be required to be considered separate buildings. Provide necessary fire wall details as required by Section 706. 5. Openings in the firewall are required to be rated properly. Provide properly rated protected openings as necessary. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved Approved/subject to field approval ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Denied E2.0 POWER / SYSTEMS PLAN: Need to call our for one rooftop receptacle with circuit info per NEC 210.63 with weatherproof GFI protection. Coordinate with FS-3.1 and FS-3.2. Panel schedule is missing critical kitchen equipment shown on FS-3.2 Kitchen Equipment schedule. Specifically, 208V equipment BI:15, SS.09, and SS.17X circuits. Other required 120 V circuits/receptacles may be missing as well. PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied First Plumbing Review: 1). SS.17 Ice maker on plan page P1.0 can't discharge to the grease system -IPC 1003.2 2). FC4 condensate on plan page P1.0 can't discharge to the grease system -IPC 1003.2 3). Per Tucson plumbing code amendments, No more than four items can discharge to a Hydromechanical grease interceptor . Update plan page P1.0 4).Add grease interceptor calculations to plan page P1.0 or P2.0 -Tucson Plumbing Code Amendments If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/08/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/09/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |