Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.3
Permit Number - T22CM06646
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
07/10/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
06/10/2024 | Commercial Electrical | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Please address the electrical plan review comments and provide a written response. 1 The load side interconnection does not comply with the OCPD rating as required per NEC 705.12(B)(2)(3)(b). Exceeds 120% of the bus bar rating, or verify bus rating or equipment per manufacturer. 2 Provide a complete grounding detail of the module racking system. 3 Provide manufacturers specifications and cut sheets for the PV modules, Inverter(s), Energy Storage, rooftop Rapid Shutdown devices, Racking, Service Equipment, DG Disconnect. REf; 2018 IBC section 107.2.1, 2017 NEC. |
||
07/10/2024 | Commercial Structural | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ACTIVITY NO. T22CM06646 ADDRESS/PARCEL: (6120 E 5TH ST Unit:A102 TUCSON, AZ 85711) Submit your revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Building Review Section comments were addressed. The submitted documents were incomplete and a thorough plan review could not be performed. Please be aware, new comments may arise with the next review. Review will not proceed without the response letter. COMMENTS: 1. You uplift calculation sheet does not contain any calculation. Please provide this information. 2. Calculation for the point load on the roof is also missing. Please provide this information. 3. Please resubmit. |
||
06/07/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |