Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - DP22-0149
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/29/2022 | Fire New Construction | APPROVED | |||
| 11/29/2022 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 12/06/2022 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/21/2022 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | DP22-0149 Comments: 1. New concrete curb per P.A.G. standard 209. Along the entire length of the property frontage of Alvernon Way. 2. Maintain 5 Ft. bike lane along Alvernon Way. 3. 3’ minimum buffer between curb and sidewalk. 4. Protect in place or relocate accordingly, existing regulatory or warning signs. 5. For additional information contact an inspector for an onsite precon. 520-791-5100 David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/06/2022 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Provide a seal on the drainage report. | ||
| 11/10/2022 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: South Tucson Commerce Center Development Package (3rd Review) DP22-0149 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 10, 2022 DUE DATE: November 21, 2022 This comment was not addressed. COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 05, 2023. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes This comment was not addressed. General Note 3 states “THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED USE IS STORAGE...”. The existing use should be vacant. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The existing use listed under General note 3 is not correct and should be listed as “VACANT”. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The required number of accessible vehicle parking spaces is based on the requirements found in the 2018 IBC Chapter 11, Table 1106.1. Based on a total of 201 vehicle parking spaces provided the total number of accessible parking spaces required should be 7 with 2 being van accessible. Revise the accessible parking calculation to reflect the current number required and to show the van accessible requirements. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The required number of vehicle parking spaces listed under General Note 19 is not correct and should be 49. This comment was not addressed. Zoning acknowledges that the long-term bicycle parking can be provided within the building, UDC Article 7.4.9.D.2.b. Provide a detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.D.2.b are met, “does not create a safety hazard or impede pedestrian circulation and in an area that is visible from employee work areas or in a locked room”. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide a detail for the proposed long-term bicycle parking that meets the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The required perimeter yard setbacks shown for the “SIDE” & “REAR” are not correct and should be 0’. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |