Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - DP22-0122
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2022 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 10/28/2022 | External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation | APPROVED | email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC 10/17/2022 Previous Tucson Parks and Recreation Department comments have been adequately addressed in this second submittal. Approval is recommended. Howard Dutt, RLA Project Manager/Landscape Architect Parks and Recreation | City of Tucson Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov main 520.631.2030 |
||
| 11/01/2022 | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority | APPROVED | See document titled: "TAA approval letter, 10.19.22" | ||
| 11/09/2022 | NPPO | NOT REQUIRED | see landscaping comments | ||
| 11/09/2022 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/03/2022 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: I-10 International ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0122 v2 Address: 4761 E Los Reales Rd Zoning: I-2 Existing Use: Undisturbed Sonoran Desert Proposed Use: Commercial Storage TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 2, 2022 DUE DATE: October 18, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. General Note - Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. UDC 7.7.3 says MAY, not shall, it is up to the reviewer’s discretion. Include in the resubmittal the reasons this should be approved. 3. The 10’ street border must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the future right of way line. UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. The street landscape borders do not meet this requirement. 4. Add totals of each species inventoried, and give a percentage of plants deemed low viability. If less than 30%, a site visit is required to verify low viability. 5. This comment was not adequately addressed - Please provide a summary of each protected species inventoried with total quantity, quantity of RFS, PIP, and TOS. 6. NP-06 has no symbols on it. Are the submitted plans and inventory only for Phase I? Add notes to clarify. 7. It is not clear why disturbing the as much of PRA is necessary as no construction is proposed on the east side. Please explain. Page 2 says PRA will remain undisturbed. UDC Tech Manual 2.5.B.2. Necessary development shall include only the crossing of riparian habitats with roadways, bikeways, paved walkways and utilities as listed below where there is no viable alternate crossing available and the crossing is necessary for the reasonable development of the property. A written explanation as to why the development is necessary shall be submitted with the appropriate plans. 8. This comment was not adequately addressed – specifically on the east parking area of phase 1, a few more trees need to added to reduce the number of spaces between trees to 6 rather than 8. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 9. The water harvesting calculations are missing the amount of first flush and how that relates to the plant water demand. Almost there! Thank you! 10. Harvesting is spelled incorrectly on WH-2 under Enforcement. 11. The grading, water harvesting and landscape plans show plants at the top of the drainage basin, how is the first flush providing irrigation in these situations? 12. It is not clear where the water from the roof is going and how erosion will be prevented. 13. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches, and should show 2” of d.g. if applicable. 14. The meter for irrigation is for that purpose only, and should be labeled as such. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |