Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - DP20-0255
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/08/2024 | Site Engineering | APPROVED | |||
| 03/12/2024 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/12/2024 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Site Landscape Notes. | ||
| 03/11/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | DP20-0255 1142 N. Richey Blvd. Comments: 1. New curb returns with 18’ radius and P.A.G. standard 209 vertical curb. 2. New 5’ wide concrete sidewalk per P.A.G. standard 200 along the entire property frontage. 3. New Curb Access Ramps at each curb return per P.A.G. standard 207. 4. Asphalt entrance in ROW paved with City Mix No. 2 5. Close existing unused curb cuts with P.A.G. standard 209 concrete curb and P.A.G. standard 200 concrete sidewalk. 6. Correct the Sight Visibility Triangle lengths. The Near Side should be 185’ and the Far Side should be 110’. 7. 3’ minimum buffer between curb and sidewalk, unless ROW is limited. 8. At least one sidewalk is required to connect the onsite circulation path to sidewalk in the ROW. 9. Where adjoining sidewalk from the property ties to sidewalk along the ROW frontage, a 60” X 60” ADA landing is required. Landings shall be 60” X 60” and not to exceed a 2% cross slope in all directions. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/12/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ACTIVITY NO. DP20-0255 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 1138/1142 N RICHEY BL/122-18-229B ZONING: R-3 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. COMMENTS: 1. Ensure all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to the Landscape/NPPO comments. 2. Please label all existing and future rights of way for N Richey BL. 7.6.4.C.2.a. on all sheets 3. Show all site visibility triangles on plan set sheets. 4. Please label all existing walls and fences that make up the landscape borders/screes. 5. The scales across the plan set, please make them all 1”= 10’. 6. Please label and clearly show the required separate irrigation meter ‘irrigation only’. TSM 4-01.6.1.A.1. 7. Missing all require planting details, please include a root barrier detail for planting near concrete. See: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects for City of Tucson provided standard details 8. Missing all required irrigation irrigation details. See: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects for City of Tucson provided standard details. 9. Missing required Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan. L-3 is missing from the submittal set. 10. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on grading and water harvesting plans. 11. No variance has been submitted for this Development Package. Either submit one, or update your landscape plans to reflect all of the requirements from previous review. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/11/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Nathan Herrera Planner PROJECT: Development Package (4th Review) DP20-0255 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 11, 2024 DUE DATE: March 11, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is December 04, 2024. 2-06.4.0 Content Requirements: 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: The address for the property is shown as 1138 N Richey Blvd. The address for the permit is shown as 1142 N Richey Blvd. Clarify what the correct address for the proposed development will be. The address will have to be changed on the plan set or changed for the permit through Tucson Development Center Online. 2-06.4.9.H Proposed Traffic Circulation 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. 2. COMMENT: The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Per the units provided in the Parking Tabulations section on the Cover Sheet 17 parking spaces are required. The Total calculation shows 16 required plus and one accessible space. The accessible space is in addition to the required total parking spaces required. 3. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.B, “Required motor vehicle parking must be located on-site”. Remove the parking showing in the right-of-way on the site plan and the reference to the “street parking spaces” on the cover sheet. The parking shown on the Site Plan does not meet the required parking amount. 4. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.K, “ A street or alley cannot be used for maneuvering directly into or from any parking space located wholly or partially outside the public right-of-way. The parking space on the north side of the site does not meet this requirement and cannot count towards the amount of required parking spaces. 5. COMMENT: Per UDC Table 7.4.11-1, For multifamily dwellings 10% of required parking spaces must be EV Ready and 20% must be EV Capable. The site plan only shows 2 EV Spaces. The Parking Tabulation shows an EV reduction of 2, with a total of 4 EV spaces provided. Add a note stating the type of EV space to be provided, to ensure the criteria for reduced amount of parking based on additional EV spaces provided is met. As a level of EV Ready or Capable is required, the 2 spaces provided that will allow for an additional 2 space reduction must be EV Installed. See UDC 7.4.5-1. 6. COMMENT: With the 2-space reduction for the EV Installed Spaces, and the 2-space reduction for the additional bicycle parking, the required amount of parking spaces is 13. Per UDC Article 7.4.10.D.8, a Parking Design Modification Request (PDMR) can be used to reduce the amount of parking spaces required by up to 5 spaces. If the amount of required parking still cannot be met onsite, a Board of Adjustment for Variance will be required. Contact Mark Castor at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. for any questions. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 7. COMMENT: Per UDC Table 6.3-2.A: the required perimeter yard setback for interior property lines is 10’-0” or ¾ the Height of the proposed exterior building wall, great of the two dimension applies. Per the Cover Sheet the Building Wall Height is 21 feet 6 inches. The required setback to the east and south is 16 feet 2 inches. Depending on how the parking comments are addressed will determine what process is needed to reduce perimeter yard setbacks. If a Board of Adjustment for Variance is required, the number of required vehicle parking spaces the perimeter yard setbacks can be included in the Variance. If you can redesign the site to meet the vehicle parking space requirements, a Design Development Option (DDO) can be used to reduce perimeter yard setbacks. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Nathan.Herrera@tucsonaz.gov or at 520-837-4894. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: revised Development Package along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 02/02/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |