Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP20-0255
Parcel: 12218229B

Address:
1138 N RICHEY BL

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - DP20-0255
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/31/2024 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing APPROVED Good afternoon,
The previous approval for DP20-0255 is still valid and honored by Pima County Addressing.
Nicholas Jordan
Site Review Project Manager – Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-9623
06/07/2024 CDRC Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
06/07/2024 NPPO REQUIRES RESUBMIT See Site Landscape Comments.
Thank you.
Chad Keller, RLA
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
05/22/2024 ROW Engineering Review REQUIRES RESUBMIT DP20-0255 2nd Comments,
1142 N. Richey Blvd.

Comments:
1. New 5’ wide concrete sidewalk per P.A.G. standard 200 along the entire property frontage. To be shown and labeled on the plan.
2. New Curb Access Ramps at each curb return per P.A.G. standard 207. To be shown and labeled on the plan.
3. Correct the southern-most curb return to show an 18’ radius.
4. Asphalt entrance in ROW paved with City Mix No. 2 with TR-22
5. Close existing unused curb cuts with P.A.G. standard 209 concrete curb and P.A.G. standard 200 concrete sidewalk. To be shown and labeled on the plan.
6. 3’ minimum buffer between curb and sidewalk, unless ROW is limited.
7. At least one sidewalk is required to connect the onsite circulation path to sidewalk in the ROW.
8. Where adjoining sidewalk from the property ties to sidewalk along the ROW frontage, a 60” X 60” ADA landing is required. Landings shall be 60” X 60” and not to exceed a 2% cross slope in all directions. Show and label this on the plan.

David Stiffey
DTM Project Coordinator
David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov
06/07/2024 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: SITE/GRADING - NEW CONSTRUCTION, UNITS 1,2,3, AND 4
ACTIVITY NO: DP20-0255
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 1142 N RICHEY BL/12218229B
ZONING: R-3 RESIDENCE ZONE/MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed.

REMAINING COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED PER THE PREVIOUS SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO REVIEW:
CAPITAL LETTER STATEMENTS = ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FOR THE APPLICANT PER THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS

1. Ensure all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to Site Landscape/NPPO approval. THIS STILL APPLIES PER RESPONSE DATED 3/11/24.

2. Label all existing and future rights of way for N Richey BL. 7.6.4.C.2.a. on all sheets. ONCE THE ROW INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE PER THE RESPONSE DATED 3/11/24, ADD THE INFORMATION TO ALL LANDSCAPE PLANS.

3. Show all site visibility triangles on landscape plan set sheets. THE SVT’S HAVE BEEN ADDED GRAPHICALLY TO THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SHEET. CLEARLY LABEL THE SVT’S ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ENTRY.

4. Please label all existing and proposed walls and fences that make up the landscape borders/screens. THE WALLS ARE SHOWN IN THE KEYNOTES, BUT NOT SHOWN WITH A LABEL CALLOUT ON THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADD THE CALLOUTS TO THE PLAN.

5. Please label and clearly show the required separate irrigation meter ‘irrigation only’. TSM 4-01.6.1.A.1. THE IRRIGATION PLAN STILL SHOW THE METER AS EXISTING. LABEL IT AS “IRRIGATION ONLY”. IF THE METER IS FOR WATER USE BEYOND IRRIGATION, THEN A NEW METER IS REQUIRED.

6. Missing all required planting details, please include a root barrier detail for planting near concrete. See: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects for City of Tucson provided standard details. ADD A NOTE TO THE TYPICAL TREE PLANTING DETAIL THAT ANY TREE WITHIN 5-FEET OF A PAVED SURFACE WILL REQUIRE THE 24-INCH DEPTH ROOT BARRIER.

7. Missing all required irrigation details.
See: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects for City of Tucson provided standard details. THE NOTE PROVIDED ON THE IRRIGATION PLAN, SHEET L-2 (PER TEC. STAND 4-01.4.2A) DOES NOT REPLACE THE REQUIREMENT OF SHOWING THE REQUIRED IRRIGATION DETAILS ON THE IRRIGATION SHEET OR ON A SEPARATE DETAIL SHEET. ADD AN IRRIGATION DETAIL SHEET IF NECESSARY.

8. No variance has been submitted for this Development Package. Either submit one or update your landscape plans to reflect all of the requirements from previous review.

ADDITIONAL CURRENT SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO COMMENTS:
9. Is the intent of your site NPPO to be an exception? If so, please reach out and I will email the NPPO Waiver form to be reviewed and approved with your next submittal.

10. If the intent to have plantings and irrigation in the ROW, then approval from DTM is required. Please contact David Marhefka (david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov) for review and approval of the proposed landscape in the ROW.

11. Provide current aerial imagery as a background on the Exhibit Key Layout, sheet 6 of 8. Also provide a legend/key to callout the photo points.

12. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval.

13. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

14. Callout #4 on sheet G1 does indicate the 8-inch minimum water harvesting basins on-site. Clearly show the outline of the depression on the civil grading plan and the landscape plan and label the areas on both plan sheets. Add notes to the proposed landscape plan that refer to the civil grading plan for shape, contouring, spot elevations and slopes. There also needs to be a 1-foot minimum transition shown from hardscape drainage (sidewalk or curb) to the top of slope for the basins, and adequate positive drainage from building foundations to the top of the slope of basins.

15. Provide a rainwater harvesting detail schematic to the proposed landscape plan. If you need an example of this detail, please contact me and I will provide an example.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
04/25/2024 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Nathan Herrera
Lead Planner

PROJECT:
Development Package (5th Review)
DP20-0255

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 25, 2024

DUE DATE: May 11, 2024

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is December 04, 2024.

2-06.4.0 Content Requirements:

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

1. COMMENT: The address for the property is shown as 1138 N Richey Blvd. The address for the permit is shown as 1142 N Richey Blvd. Clarify what the correct address for the proposed development will be. The address will have to be changed on the plan set or changed for the permit through Tucson Development Center Online.

The above comment was not addressed. A change of addressed will have to be requested under the permit number.

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

2. COMMENT: Per UDC Table 6.3-2.A: the required perimeter yard setback for interior property lines is 10’-0” or ¾ the Height of the proposed exterior building wall, great of the two dimension applies.

Per the Cover Sheet the Building Wall Height is 21 feet 6 inches. The required setback to the east and south is 16 feet 2 inches.

The Comment Response Letter provided states; “Setback to be allowed per existing building”, that is not correct.
The setback dimension provided on the site plan for the southern boundary is not accurate. The setback to the southern boundary appears to be 10 feet 3 inches.

A Design Development Option must be applied for and approved before this permit can be approved by Zoning.
DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/planning-amp-zoning/2019_ddo_for_setback_and_height_udc.pdf
For more information about the DDO process contact Wyatt Berger at wyatt.berger@tucsonaz.gov or Georgia Pennington at Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Nathan.Herrera@tucsonaz.gov or at 520-837-4894.


RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: revised Development Package along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.
05/07/2024 Zoning Modifications - DDO REQUIRES RESUBMIT DATE: 5/7/24
FROM: Georgia Pennington, Planner

COMMENTS:

1. Zoning has identified an item that requires a Design Development Option (DDO). The DDO application and requirements may be retrieved from: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/planning-amp-zoning/ddo_for_setback_and_height_udc.pdf The completed application shall be submitted as a PDF under assigned permit number DP20-0255

If you have questions about this transmittal, please email me at georgia.pennington@tucsonaz.gov.
04/15/2024 CDRC Application Completeness REVIEW COMPLETED