Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: CIP-0424-00015
Parcel: 14039052F

Review Status: Approved

Review Details: CIP - DEVELOPMENT SITE - INITIAL v.1

Plan Number - CIP-0424-00015
Review Name: CIP - DEVELOPMENT SITE - INITIAL v.1
Review Status: Approved
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
TW Planning and Engineering Review APPROVED Marking Approved in the system to allow to go to the next review stage. However there are some important comments that need to be addressed.

Primary Comment.
__Since this is a Water Modification - separate water modification plans need to be submitted per Tucson Water standards__


See Attachment Sheet 67of77 of TW markups:

"The development that the stubs will serve will require a water master plan to verify adequate sizing. We would recommend that Water New Area Development before sizing and installing this pipe."

"We're requesting detailed storm drain sheets for this project"

For all storm drain and water line crossings we require a minimum 3' vertical clearance above the existing water line per Tucson Water SD-107.

Landscaping Comments. All trees need to have a minimum 10' offset of water lines. There are several instances where this is not yet being observed that need to be corrected. See TW Design Standard No. 8-08 4.3

On the water modification plans the sewer crossing needs to be detailed. There may be water/sewer vertical spacing issues with the proposed stub-out location.

This project entails building up additional cover near and around the craycroft / los reales intersection. The additional loading on the existing pipes needs to be reviewed as well as the ultimate depths of those pipes in order to maintain reasonable maintenance access.
DTM Electrical NOT REQUIRED
Real Estate NOT REQUIRED
CDRC Post Review REVIEW COMPLETED
Commercial Plumbing REVIEW COMPLETED
Entitlements REVIEW COMPLETED No entitlement required. -GS
Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED
Floodplain Administration Review REVIEW COMPLETED 1) On Sheets 200-208 of the Grading & Paving Plans, submit drainage report for proposed culvert extensions or other drainage improvement, including any scour calculations for regulatory flow conditions impacting proposed improvements plus associated erosion/scour protection design, as well as calculations / rock sizing for proposed outlet spillways.
2) On Sheets 200-208 of the Grading & Paving Plans, delineate & label regulatory flowrates and floodplain limits or centerlines for Rodeo Watershed tributaries crossing project at Craycroft & Los Reales Roads, across Los Reales Rd west of Interpretive Center, & crossing along Los Reales Rd east of Swan Rd.
Historic REVIEW COMPLETED Only portions of this alignment have been surveyed for archaeological resources. Areas that have not been surveyed should be surveyed. Any areas where the survey is over 10 years of age (and out of date) should be resurveyed. Please submit a Cultural Resources Clearance form and Historic staff can retain the services of an archaeological consulting firm. Questions? Jodie.Brown@tucsonaz.gov
New Services/JOC REVIEW COMPLETED CIP-0424-00015 - CIP - Development Site - Initial v1 – 5300 E LOS REALES RD
Los Reales Sustainability Campus Linear Trail Phase 1 Linear trail and intersection improvement

Tucson Water’s New Development Section offers the following comments on the submittal:

1. No developer-built water main projects are located in this area other than PN 2-063-2022 – Blackhawk Ranch Phase 1, Lots 1-157 in Garden Stone Avenue. It is my understanding that the construction of it is either complete or nearly complete, but I recommend the Project Manager verify this understanding with the Construction Section.

2. Sheets C-100, C-101, C102, C-103 & C-104: The existing water lines on these sheets do not appear to include all of the fire hydrants, water valves, or water service meter boxes that may need to be re-adjusted to grade. Please verify these features have been shown by comparing these sheet to Tucson Water’s SW141514 valve map and PN 2-063-2022.

3. Sheet C400: The existing 12” water main constructed in Craycroft Road, north of Los Reales Road per PN 104-2006 has been misidentified as PN 11-2010.

4. Sheet C400: The proposed 8” water main stub shown on this sheet should terminate with a valve and drain valve assembly.

5. Sheet C401: The new 4” water main stub shown on this sheet should terminate with a valve and drain valve assembly.

6. Sheets L4.1 – L4.5: As the irrigation water will be obtained from a pond (a non-potable water source), all of the new irrigation transmission and distribution lines must be separated from the public water mains, as if they were sewer lines. Please verify the horizontal and vertical separation between the water mains and the irrigation water transmission and distribution lines conform to SD-106.

7. Sheet RD-20: Two water main stubs and a section of sewer line have been shown on this sheet. Should they have been shown on Sheets C400 and C401?

Any questions, comments or concerns about these comments may be directed to:

Tim Rowe, P.E., Civil Engineer
Tucson Water, New Development Section
201 N. Stone Avenue, #2-220
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, AZ 85726-7210
(520) 837-2106
tim.rowe@tucsonaz.gov
NPPO REVIEW COMPLETED Please see Site Landscape Comments. Thank you.
ROW Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED Please see attached DTM ROW Engineering Review file in attachments.
Signs REVIEW COMPLETED RE: signage review - information
For: relocation of freestanding sign (to SW corner Craycroft and Los Reales)
AT: 5300 E Los Reales Rd
CIP review case: CIP-0424-000015
Reviewer: Heather Thrall (Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov)
Date: 5/2/24

Codes applicable to signs include: Unified Development Code (UDC, 7A, Sign Standards), National Electrical Code (NEC), Tucson - Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC), International Building Code (IBC)
1. UDC:
A) Proposal indicates in the plan set notes that a relocation of a freestanding sign structure is planned at the SW corner of Los Reales and Craycroft.
B) Unclear what use sign is for and whether for Industrial establishment or for trail area, specify.
C) provide setback from each face of street curb to the closest edge of the structure (20’ required for a monument, 30’ required for a pole category size of sign. A monument is 50 square feet of sign area and 10’ tall, a pole sign is 12’ tall max and 72 square feet of sign display area on the structure).
D) For permanent signs identifying the use / site, valued at over $1000.00, or are illuminated, their installation would be done via a licensed sign contractor. The contractor would submit plans for review (including all construction specifications and diagrams), with resulting sign permit issued for the installation. If a GC is constructing a wall structure, it can be permitted first under a building permit, with sign paneling permitted separately by sign contractor.
E) if the sign is in the right of way, a temporary revocable easement (TRE) is needed through Real Estate Division – recommend contact with Tiana Clark or Bob Beecher.
F) Should sign be for private use, see sign area and sign allowances of industrial, section UDC 7A.10.2.A and B. This is per PAD-14 document statement the PAD zoning bases the uses off industrial development. (Per interpretation of UDC 7A.10.11.4 for PAD zones to base sign area off the chart applicable to the underlying zone indicated.)
Incidental signs – along the park route -
G) for planning of incidental / informational signage and for addressing the existing signage at the site: Incidental signs do not count toward allowed sign area. Such signs are under 12 square feet in size and can be detached from or attached to a building. Such signs typically are informational in purpose (i.e. office location) and meant for on site users. Such signs may be reflective in nature. When detached, position them a minimum of 5 feet from fire hydrants 18 inches from parking spaces and 2 feet from access drives. If illuminated, such signs require permits regardless of size.

Please feel free to email me for any signage questions at any location, or for other permanent, prominent signs (Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov)
Site Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED 1. Include a drainage report that covers retention/detention requirements and discusses any floodplains impacted by the proposed work.
2. Show any floodplain delineations on the proposed plans.
3. Include a SWPPP with the next submittal.

Stephen Blood
(520) 837-4958
Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov
Site Landscape REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
PDSD LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: LOS REALES SUSTAINABILTY CAMPUS - LINEAR TRAIL
ACTIVITY NO: CIP-0424-00015
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 5300 E LOS REALES RD/ 14039052F
ZONING: PAD-14 LOS REALES PAD

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed.

LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval.

2. Please identify the site monitor and list contact information on the NPPO sheet.

3. Some of the plants chosen in the Native Seed Mix are not on the Native Seed List per UDC 5-02.6.0 Exhibit 1. Please provide documentation/reason for selecting plants that are not on the approved UDC Native Seed List.

4. Clearly label the right of way on all landscape plans.

5. Any trees located within 5 feet of the new asphalt multipurpose path, please include a root barrier on the plans and a construction detail showing root barriers for plants located near hardscape areas. (see Detail 402 located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects

6. Please show NPPO transplants with a different symbol or something to distinguish them on the planting legend and on the planting plans.

7. Can the rainwater harvesting basins be shown on the civil grading plan?

8. Can the rainwater harvesting basins be continuous with organic shape with less hard angles?

9. Please include 6-9 inch minimum depth rainwater harvesting basin note on the plans.

10. Please show irrigation sleeve on the mainline crossing the asphalt path in the above viewport on sheet L4.1.

PAD-14 COMMENTS:
11. The plans appear to have followed the Landscape/Landscape Borders/NPPO/Riparian standards laid out in the Los Reales PAD-14 document.

If you have any questions, please contact me at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
Site Zoning REVIEW COMPLETED It appears most of the improvements are occurring within the ROW. Zoning does not have any comments at this time.
Storm to Shade Review REVIEW COMPLETED Comments from S2S have been added via Studio review
Traffic Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED Marked up traffic comments from DTM Traffic Engineering Division on 95% plans emailed to Reba Schaber on 5/2/24.
Traffic Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED Marked up traffic comments from DTM Traffic Engineering Division on 95% plans emailed to Reba Schaber on 5/2/24.
Transportation Landscape Review REVIEW COMPLETED L2.0 LS Site Plan Ensure all plants are from the ADWR Plant List for the Tucson Region
L2.0 LS Site Plan Check locations of seed mixes. No trees in seed mix area near pathways, ok in large basins and areas not adjacent to roads and paths. Possibly use different size hatch to differentiate seed mixes so easily read from plan. PC Riparian Habitat Mitigation Guideline has good seed mixes by watershed in the back of the book.
General Planting sheets Watch placement of trees in relation to underground drainage pipes some are close if not on pipes.
L2.0 Decorative Rock Red rock doesn't do well if we need to go back into the area for repairs or replacements, the soil always leaves a scar. a gold color is more like the native soils.
is the 1/4minus for the path or other landscape areas? It ends up compacted and waters end up running off it and not infiltrating if used in landscape areas. use a screened rock if not using for pathway
L4.1-5 Irrigation plans Make certain to mark ALL sleeves on the plan, you may want to use a faded back line type as a sleeve symbol.
L4.1 Irrigation plans Do we have power to the pond to run the pump etc…I’m not familiar with this project. What is the source that feeds the pond water?
L5.4 Irr Details DTL 34 Add a small ball valve to the flush end cap just below the cap.
Transportation Maps and Records Review REVIEW COMPLETED
Water - PDSD REVIEW COMPLETED