Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Case: T10DV07810

Parcel: 10612016A

Inspection Status: Approved

Inspection History: INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE

Case Number - T10DV07810

Inspection Description - INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE

Inspection Status - Approved

Date Description Inspector Results Comments
08/04/2011 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE Approved CK DSD P+ FOUND SITE PLAN APPROVED & FINALED! CASE ABATED!
05/20/2011 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE Approved MET W/MHP OWNER DISCUSSED SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND VIOLATION AS IT CURRENTLY IS.
04/20/2011 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE Approved CHANGE OUT OWNER TO NEW OWNER AND RESEND NOV TO NEW OWNER.
04/13/2011 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE Approved RECIEVED CALL FROM NEW OWNER OF PROPERTY. MET W/NEW OWNER AND WALKED PROPERTY DISCUSSED THE VIOLATIONS. REVIEWED 1954 SITE PLAN AND THE TERM GRANDFATHERING. EXPLAINED THE IMPORTANCE OF GETTING A NEW SITE PLAN APPROVED THRU THE CITY IDENTIFYING ALL THE CHANGES TO THE PROPERTY. SENT OWNER E-MAIL W/ATTACHEMENT TO PRO SO OWNER CAN VIEW THE PERMITS AND ZONING ADMINSTRATORS LETTER. FU IN 30 DAYS
03/07/2011 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE Approved MHP MGR STILL NOT READY W/SITE PLAN YET. NEEDS TO SUBMIT PLAN FOR APPROVAL. FU IN 2 WKS
01/18/2011 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE Approved OWNER HAS NOT YET RE-SUBMITTED SITE PLAN. DISCUSSED LETTER FROM ZONING AND REQUIREMENTS. OWNER TO SUBMIT AND PAY FOR REVIEW OF SITE PLAY BY JAN 24, 2011. CONTACTED PIMA COUNTY TO SEE IF IT IS POSSIBLE FOR THEM TO ASSIST IN CLEANING UP PROPERTY. ADVISED PARK OWNER TO OBTAIN A ROLL OFF WHICH WELL ALLOW HIS TENANTS TO CLEAR THEIR LOTS OF REFUSE AND DEAD VEGETATION.
12/07/2010 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE Approved CONTACTED PLANNING ADMIN BW.
LUC APP# T10SA00420
APPLIED ON 11/19/10
NO FEES PAID YET FOR THE REVIEW
NO MEETINGS SCHEDULED YET.

ZONING ADMIN STATES OWNER WANTS $200 FEE WAIVED
BACK IN 2003 THE SITE PLAN WAS DENIED AND OWNER WAS REQUIRED TO RESUBMIT A SITE PLAN ADDRESSING THE CITIES CONCERNS. NO SITE PLAN WAS EVER RESUBMITTED BACK TO THE CITY.
PLANNING FOUND ILLEGAL ADDITIONS ON THE PROPERTY.
12/03/2010 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE Approved NO CURRENT SITE PLAN APPROVAL ON FILE W/CITY.