Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Approved
Inspection History: INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT
Case Number - T07DV02125
Inspection Description - INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT
Inspection Status - Approved
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/02/2007 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | Approved | 03/30/07 MET BOB THE MANAGER AT THE LOCATION WAS GOING TO CHECK PEDESTAL TODAY //REC'D A MAP THAT AFFORDABLE ELECTRIC WAS USING TO PULL ALL PHOTO EYES FROM PEDESTALS // THERE WERE ALSO SEALED TOO // PAPER WORK SHOWED ALL WAS COMPLETED BY 03/22/07 /// SPOT CHECK THE PEDESTAL FOR 2 HOURS IN PARK AND ALL PAPER WORK WAS CORRECT SOME PHOTOS TAKEN BUT IN COMPLIANCE // FOR THIS SECTION // BOB IS ALSO WORKING WITH SOMEONE TO DO THE DRAWINGS FOR A NEW LIGHTING SYSTEM /// AV | |
| 03/21/2007 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | Approved | 03/20/2007 FAX CAME IN FROM MONROE & MCDONOUGH FROM ATTORNEY STEVE ITKIN AS A APPEAL OF THE NOV TIME LINE// | |
| 03/21/2007 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | Approved | 03/20/07 PER INSPECTOR HERD- SPOKE WITH ELISEO GARZA ON 03/20/07 EXPLAINING ISSUES ON PROPERTY CONCERNING EXTERIOR LIGHTING INSTALLED. LIGHTING HAS ALOT OF HAZARDOUS ISSUES DEALING WITH REPAIRS NOT PROPERLY INSTALLED AND WITHOUT SECURING PROPER PERMITS , ATTORNEY ITKINS WAS LOOKING TO APPLY FOR AN APPEAL AT THIS TIME DIRECTOR GARZA WAS NOT AWARE OF ATTORNEY ITKING SENDING IN THE PROPER PAPER WORK TO DO THIS EARLY AFTERNOON DIRECTOR GARZA STOPPED BY MY OFFICE (INSPECTOR HERD) WITH PAPER WORK FROM ATTORNEY ITKIN ASKING FOR APPEAL, I EXPLAINED TO DIRECTOR GARZA THAT LATE MONDAY NIGHT APPROX 5:00PM THAT MYSELF & INSPECTOR VINDIOLA HAD VISITED THE PROPERTY & MET WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR BUTCH(AFFORDABLE ELECTRIC) AND PROPERTY MANAGER BOB, ALSO AT MEETING WAS MAINT.OF PROPERTY, FEMALE TAKING NOTES, AT THE MEETING IT WAS AGREED DUE TO SEVERAL DIFFERENT HAZARDS WAS TO DISCONNECT ALL DOUBLE LUGGING TO MOBILE HOME PEDESTALS, CALLED AND WENT OVER WHAT WENT ON IN THIS MEETING TO ATTORNEY MR. ITKIN, AND MR, ITKIN AGREED THAT SOUNDS LIKE EVERY BODY IS NOW ON THE SAME PAGE, WILL TALK WITH OWNER OF AFFORDABLE ELECTRICAL BASICALLY TO CONFIRM IS ALL ACHIEVABLE EXPLAINED TO ELISEO FROM CONVERSATION THE NIGHT BEFORE THAT ALL SEEMED TO BE UNDER CONTROL, I (MR. HERD) THINK THIS WAS DONE PREVIOUSLY BEFORE END OF MEETING & CONVERSATION WITH MR. ITKIN SO AS TO PROTECT OWNER OF PROPERTY DIRECTOR GARZA HAD ASKED IF I WOULD CALL MR ITKING TO SEE WHERE HE NOW STANDS ON THE APPEAL, I AGREED.CALLED MR. ITKIN TO SEE WHERE HE IS AT WITH THIS, MR ITKIN STATED BASICALLY EVERY THING SEEMS TO AGREEABLE BUT WOULD STILL LIKE TO TALK WITH AFFORDABLE ELECTRIC TO SEE IF EVERYTHING IS ACHIEVABLE TIME FRAMES, I AGREEDMR ITKIN TO CALL ME BACK (MR HERD)/// MR ITKIN CALLED BACK WITH AFFORDABLE ELECTRIC ON 3 WAY CALLING, WENT OVER ISSUES AND WAS AGREED UPON IN MEETING 1)DOES NOT SEEM TO BE AN ISSUE TO ABATE HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS CONCERNING THE DOUBLE LUGGING PLACED ON MOBILE HOME ELECTRICAL PEDESTALS, THROUGHOUT PROPERTY, REMOVING, DE-ENERGIZING ANY AND ALL LIGHTS PLACED ON THIS CIRCUIT, COMPLIANCE TIME 03/26/2007 2) IS TO HIRE ENGINEER TO DO DRAWING/PLANS AND TO SUBMIT TO D.S.D TO SECURE ALL REQUIRED PERMITS. CONVERSATION INCLUDED TIME FRAMES, AGAIN SEEMS TO BE NO ISSUE TO ABATE HAZARDS PLACED UPON MOBILE HOME ELECTRICAL PEDESTALS.ALSO WHAT IF ENGINEER CAN NOT OR DOES NOT HAVE ALL DRAWINGS COMPLETED, OR IF DRAWINGS/PLANS ARE SUBMITTED BUT HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED, EXPLAINED AGAIN THAT AS LONG AS THERE IS GOOD FAITH SHOWING THINGS ARE IN DEED MOVING FORWARD, AN EXTENSION CAN BE GRANTED, BUT IF THINGS DO NOT MOVE FORWARD CITATION WILL BE ISSUED. ATTORNEY MR. ITKIN CONFIRMED WILL NOT BE MOVING FORWARD WITH APPEAL . BUTCH WAS TO TALK WITH D.S.D. IN REGARDS TO CAN HE REINSTALL 15 AMP FUSEABLE LINKS FOR PROTECTION TO TRANSFORMER AND SYSTEM IF SOMETHING GOES WRONG, (TEMPORARY UNTIL NEW SYSTEM GOES INTO PLACE) MOST OR SOME OF THE TRANSFORMERS DO HAVE THIS APPLICATION ALL READY INSTALLED. ALSO BUTCH WAS ASKING ABOUT INSTALLING #4 LUG ON MOBILE HOME PEDESTALS TO ALLOW FOR LIGHTING CONNECTION, THIS ALSO WAS REFERRED AS QUESTION TO D.S.D // |
|
| 03/19/2007 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | Approved | 03/19/07 - BOTH MR HURD AND I CALLED ATTORNEY ITKIN TODAY ADVISED HIM THE APPEAL WOULD HAVE TO FILED AT DSD 201 N. STONE WAS UPSET THAT HE WOULD HAVE TO GO DOWN TODAY // GOT INTO THE CASE AGAIN STATING IT WOULD BE A HAZARD TURNING OFF THE LIGHTS TO THE PARK STATED AFFORTABLE ELECTRIC IS WORKING ON IDENTIFING THE HAZARDS BUT DID NOT WANT PARK DARK // ATTORNEY ITKIN AND US CAME TO A UNDERSTANDING WE WOULD MEET WITH THE ELECTRICIAN AT THE PROPERTY TODAY // NOT SURE WHAT ATTORNEY ITKIN WOULD BE DOING FROM HERE ABOUT THE APPEAL // AV | |
| 03/19/2007 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | Approved | 03/19/07 AFTER TALKING TO ATTORNEY REC'D A CALL FROM DAWN FROM AFFORDABLE ELECTRIC TRYING TO CONFIRM ALL LIGHTS OR JUST SECTIONS OF LIGHTS / MR HURD EXPLAINED TO HER HE HAD NOT VISITED THE SITE TO THIS POINT ONLY BY PICTURES,NOTES AND CONVERSATIONS/ ALSO EXPLAINED TO DAWN THIS IS THEIR ARENA WITH ALL ELECTRICAL IN THEY KNOW OR SE HAZARDS THIS IS TO BE ADDRESSED / BUTCH IS THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IF ANYONE KNOWS HE SHOULD // MR HURD EXPLAINED LIBILITY ISSUES WITH THE NOV BEING SERVED IF NOTHING DONE AND SOMEONE GET HURTS LIBILITY WILL BE EXTENSIVE ULTIMATELY OWNER AND ALL OTHER PARTIES WILL BE CALLED IN// ADVISED THEM IF AFFORDABLE WENT OUT AND DISCONNECTED ALL LIGHTING, AFFORDABLE CAN GO DOWN TO DSD TO SECURE A TEMPORARY POWER PERMIT TO RE-ENERGIZE LIGHTING SYSTEM// DAWN STATED THAT BUTCH IS IN SADDLEBROOK FOR THE NEXT 2 DAYS // ADVISED HER WE WOULD MEET BUTCH OR ANOTHER CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR UP QUESTIONS OF THE NOV // | |
| 03/19/2007 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | Approved | 03/19/07 REC'D ANOTHER CALL FROM DAWN FROM AFFORDABLE ASKED IF WE COULD MEET THIS AFTERNOON, WE AGREED/// AV | |
| 03/16/2007 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | Approved | 03/16/2007 - REC'D A CALL FROM DESERT CLASSIC MHP ATTORNEY STEVE ITKIN 325-2000 X-114 / FAX 886-3527 // 6280 E. PIMA ST. SUITE # 105 / TUC.AZ. 85712 // REQUESTED THE FORMS TO FILE AN APEAL ADVISED HIM I WOULD FAX THOSE TO HIM // HE STATED IT WAS NOT ENOUGH TIME FOR THEM TO DO THE WORK // ADVISED HIM ALL THEY HAD TO DO WAS DISCONNECT FROM THE TRANSFORMERS OR DISTRIBUTION BOXES// HE STATED WORK WAS BEING DONE BY AFFORDABLE ELECTRIC TO IDENTIFY NON COMPLIANT WORK NOW // MR ITKIN ALSO STATED IT WAS A HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUE DEEMED BY THE TPD I ASKED WHO FROM TPD MADE THAT STATEMENT HE STATED HE HAS WORK WITH THE WEEDS AND SEED PROGRAM IN THIS AREA BEFORE / DISCUSSION WENT BACK TO NOV AND SECURING A PERMIT SO THAT THEY (MHP) WOULD NOT HAVE TO DISCONNECT // ADVISED HIM HE COULD DO THAT BUT IT WOULD HAVE TO BE DONE BEFORE THE 15 DAY TIME FRAME STATED HE UNDERSTOOD // HE THEN ASKED FOR A COPY OF ARE DISCUSSION TODAY AND AGAIN THE APPEAL FORMS AND STATED THEY WOULD LOOKING FORWORD TO WOKING WITH US AND HAD INTENTIONS ON BEING COMPLIANT /// AV | |
| 03/15/2007 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | Violation | 03/08/07 HANDED THE NOV TO THE MANAGER BOB AND EXPLAINED THE VIOLATIONS TO HIM // WAS A LITTLE UPSET THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO DISCONNECT THE POWER TO THE STREET LIGHTS THE OFFICE MANAGER (LADY) CAME OUT OF OFFICE AND WAS VERY UPSET TOO// EXPLAINED TO THEM BOTH THE VIOLATION IS A HAZZARD AND WOULD NEED TO BE DISCONNECTED/// F/U ON 03/26/07 /// AV | |
| 03/15/2007 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | Violation | 03/14/07 MANAGER BOB CAME TO OFFICE OF DNR TO GET AN EXTENSION FOR THE DISCONNECT AND PERMITS // ALSO SAID HE HAS A MEETING WITH TEP TO SEE IF THEY CAN TAKE OVER THE STREET LIGHT SITUATION // DID NOT SAY WHEN THEY WERE GOING TO MEET WITH TEP // SPOKE TO MR ORTA , VIDAL AND SUPV. SALDATE ALL AGREED THE 15 DAY NOV TO DISCONNECT WOULD STAND THIS IS A HAZZARD AND NO EXTENSION WOULD BE GRANTED // MEET WITH MANAGER BOB AROUND 1:00 THAT SAME DAY AND EXPLAINED NO EXTENSION WOULD BE GRANTED AND WHY HE UNDERSTOOD // ADVISED HIM ABOUT THE FOLLOW UP DATE OF 03/26/2007 /// AV | |
| 03/07/2007 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | Violation | 02/07/07 CHECK THE LOCATION WITH INSPECTOR VIDAL & INSPECTOR ORTA // PROBLEMS SEEM TO BE WITH THE STREET LIGHTS TO THE PARK // IMPROPER WIRES USED TO POWER THE POLES - INSTALLED UNDERGROUND - INPROPER DEPTH UNDERGOUND-BRANCH CIRCUIT DELIVERED FROM DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM - PLUMBING PIPING USED AS CONDUIT// 16-4 WORK WITHOUT PERMITS NO PERMITS WERE OBTAINED FOR THE LIGHT POLES IN THE PARK |