Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Case: T05DV00569

Parcel: 116060780


Addresses:

2940 W SPEEDWAY BL

Inspection Status: Approved

Inspection History: INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE

Date Description Inspector Results Comments
05/05/2006 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE Approved VISITED SITE, KNOCKED ON FRONT DOOR RECEIVED NO ANSWER. IN THE FRONT YARD AREA I FOUND THAT NEW SPLIT RAIL FENCING HAD BEED ADDED TO AND GRAVEL FOUND IN THE DRIVE. YARD AREA HAD BEED CLEARED OF ALL WORK DEBRIS READY TO LANDSCAPE. NO PERMITS NEEDED.

MY ISSUE ORIGINALLY WAS FOR WORK WITHOUT PERMITS. I ORIGINALLY FOUND THE HOUSE BEING REMODELED. IN SPEAKING TO THE OWNER, HE WAS VERY CERTAIN THAT PERMITS WOULD NOT BE REQUIRED AS HE WAS CHANGING OUT ALL ITEMS ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING AND CABINETS LIKE FOR LIKE; REPLACING DOORS AND TILE AND RE-PAINTING.

PRIOR TO MY INSPECTION I SPOKE WITH INSPECTORS ORTA AND ROMERO WHO AGREED THEY WOULD NOT CITE IF FIXTURES WERE BEING CHANGED LIKE FOR LIKE. I DID QUESTION ORTA ON FANS BEING CHANGED OUT FOR LIGHTS, BUT THAT THE FIXTURES WERE MOUNTED ON 4X8 RAFTERS. JERRY MENTIONED HE STILL WOULD NOT CITE.

IN OR DURING A FOLLOW UP INSPECTION THE ELECTRICAL ISSUES HAD BEEN ABATED.

AND AFTER FURTHER CONVERSATIONS WITH INSPECTORS AND DSD, I AM WITHDRAWING OR RETREATING MY ISSUE OF PERMITS REQUIRED, ABATING ALL ISSUE ON THE N.O.V.

I CALLED OWNER PAUL OLSON, EXPLAINED THAT AFTER FURTHER INVESTIGATION FOUND THAT PERMITS WOULD NOT BE REQUIRED. PAUL MENTIONED THAT HE HAD APPLIED FOR A PERMIT, WAS TOLD AT THAT TIME IT WAS NOT REQUIRED, APOLOGIZED FOR NOT RESPONDING AFTER HIS DISCOVERY. NO PICTURES WERE TAKEN. BATTERY FOR CAMERA WAS LEFT IN OFFICE!! COMPLIANCE CASE CLOSED!!
09/23/2005 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE Approved VISITED SITE, KNOCKED ON FRONT DOOR, RECEIVED NO ANSWER. FOUNT WORK HAS CONTINUED ON THE HOUSE ITSELF EVIDENCED BY THE NEWLY INSTALLED FRONT DOOR, TILE INSTALLED THROUGHOUT THE HOUSE, AND NEWLY INSTALLED CEILING FANS. FOUND THAT THE ELECTRICAL ROMEX LYING ON THE GROUND, CONNECTED TO THE RV HAD BEEN REMOVED, HOWEVER THE JUNCTION BOX THAT THE ROMEX WAS CONNECTED TO REMAINED UNCOVERED (NO COVER PLATE) LEAVING WIRES AND WIRE NUTS EXPOSED TO THE ELEMENTS. FOUND THAT THE TRASH AND DEBRIS LEFT LYING AROUND THE PROPERTY HAD BEEN PICKED UP AND REMOVED FROM THE PROPERTY. AND FOUND THAT THE RV HAD BEEN REMOVED FROM THE SOUTHEAST DRIVE AND PLACED IN THE SOUTHWEST DRIVE, SOUTH OF THE EXISTING CARPORT. CHECKED PERMITS PLUS TO VERIFY THAT PERMIT HAD BEEN SECURED. FOUND PERMIT WAS IN APPLIED STATUS, MONEY HAD BEEN PAID FOR PERMIT, BUT WAS STILL BEING REVIEWED BY DAVE WITT. SENT EMAIL TO ZONING ASKING IF OWNER WAS IN VIOLATION FOR NOT REMOVING RV. NO POWER OR WASTE LINES WERE SEEN CONNECTED TO THE RV. PICTURES WERE TAKEN. WILL COMPLETE FOLLOW BEFORE CLOSING CASE.
08/12/2005 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE Approved VISITED SITE CONCERNING ELECTRICAL, AND POSSIBLE ISSUE OF TENANT RECONNECTING THE ELECTRICAL FROM THE RV TO THE HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL BOXES. FOUND THAT ELECTRICAL HAD NOT BEEN RECONNECTED INTO THE ELECTRICAL BOX IN QUESTION AT THIS TIME. NO CONTACT HAS BEEN MADE WITH OWNER AT THIS TIME.