Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Closed
Inspection History: GRADING - FINAL
Permit Number - T05BU01344
Inspection Description - GRADING - FINAL
Inspection Status - Closed
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/13/2020 | GRADING - FINAL | Closed | THIS SITE IS BEING CLOSED AT THIS TIME, THE SITE HAD CORRECTIONS THAT WERE NEEDED IN 2013 WHEN IT WAS LAST INSPECTED. | |
| 07/29/2013 | GRADING - FINAL | Correction Required | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED BY THE LANDSCAPING SECTION AS THE MINIMAL REQUIREMENTS THAT NEED TO BE MET ON THIS SITE FOR A FINAL RELEASE OF ALL ASSURANCES AND THE CLOSING OF ALL OPEN PERMITS ON THIS SITE. THIS HAS BEEN FORWARDED BY MYSELF TO MR. ROB BRACK SO THAT HE CAN VERIFY WHETHER ALL OF THE WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME. To verify that landscaping is installed per conditions imposed for Case # S04-141, provide previously approved landscape plans for reference with submittal. Revised landscape plan shall include: AM 2-10 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data Cross-reference to: Rezoning case; Subdivision case; Board of Adjustment case; Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Planting Plan: Both the proper and common name of each type of plant material Number of individual plants inventoried An NPPO plan was submitted and approved along with the landscape plan which contained mitigation for protected native plants as well as plants to transplanted on-site; Provide the following to verify that NPPO requirements have been met: SALVAGE AND MITIGATION REPORT: On- site monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre. The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file. Protected Native Plants that do not survive the salvage process shall be replaced on a one-to-one basis (same size and species). Additional comments may apply |
|
| 07/24/2013 | GRADING - FINAL | Correction Required | JASON GREEN, DAVID RIVER, ROB BRACK, , AND MYSELF MET ONSITE TO LOOK OVER THE COMMENTS FOR THE SITE THAT WERE GENERATED SINCE OUR SITE VISIT ON 7/1/13. LISTED BELOW IS A SUMMARY OF THE COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN GENERATED BY ZONING AND ENGINEERING THESE ITEMS WILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO THE CLOSING OF THIS PERMIT: SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised grading plan (As-Built). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the revised grading plan at this time. The following items have been field verified during the last inspection with the Engineering Inspector, Engineering Reviewer and Zoning Reviewer and are inadequate to provide an ENG Inspection Final the following items need to be addressed prior to final grading plan approval and final inspection sign off: GRADING PLAN: 1) Provide wheel stops at all parking areas with stalls that are 20-feet in length and abut sidewalks that are not a minimum of 6.5 feet wide. Parking stalls must be designed and constructed so that the vehicles do not encroach over the required minimum 4-foot wide sidewalk for pedestrian access. 2) Provide the parking space striping for the required parking stalls located adjacent to and north of the existing mail boxes. Per the last approved Tentative Plat and Grading Plan this area is required to have 14 parking spaces; however the spaces are not delineated on site. 3) Provide a revised grading plan that correctly shows location of all sidewalks on site, it is acknowledged that some areas have been deleted or revised due to handicap accessibility requirements and existing grades in the field however all portions that have been constructed needs to be shown on the plan set. Elimination of sidewalks from in front of the buildings along the drives will require new rezoning conditions. 4) Per the last approved Tentative Plat and Grading Plan there is a required pedestrian trail that goes through Common Area B adjacent to the south side of Units 126-135 that is not delineated onsite. The trail must be clearly defined for pedestrian use and must be delineated differently than the landscaping area. 5) Field visit verified multiple handicap access ramps onsite that exceed the maximum 8.3% slope required for ANSI conformance. Provide handicap access ramps that meet the maximum longitudal slope requirements for accessibility. 6) Provide hand railing at areas of the handicap accessibility ramps and sidewalk areas that have runs with a rise greater than 6-inches to comply with Section 505 of the ICC A117.1-2009. 7) Verify that all required handicap parking spaces have been installed and clearly marked on site. Per the "As-Builts" and a field visit there are multiple handicap spots that have been either moved or deleted from the site. Verify that the correct numbers of handicap spots per the parking calculations are provided. 8) Revise the plan set to verify handicap accessibility from River Road into the subdivision. The pedestrian sidewalk along the east portion of the site has a portion of the access gate encroaching into the sidewalk and does not allow for the minimum 3-foot width per ANSI or the 4-foot width per the Development Standards. Also the pedestrian access on the west side has a ramp that terminates at the access driveway with no connection to the other side or down along the entire west side adjacent to the mail boxes. The pedestrian access must either continue along the same side of the roadway and in front of the mail boxes meeting slope requirements with landings and hand railing if applicable or it must continue to the other side of the road with a clear pedestrian cross walk and curb cuts with ramps into the median and landscape area to get the accessibility to the other side of the access road. 9) Verify that all handicap spots meet the maximum slope requirements of 2% in all directions. Field verification showed some of the handicap spots exceeding the 2% maximum slope requirements. 10) Field visit verified multiple light poles that have not been fully constructed. The pole base and wiring has been installed however the poles and lights have not been installed. These poles must be installed to meet the light requirements for the site. 11) Provide the hand railing along the pedestrian access path adjacent to the 3-cell scuppers located in the far southwest corner of the site. It appears that the sidewalk included the pipe set into the concrete for providing removable railing, but the railing was not installed onsite. 12) Revise the railing provided at the access location for the concrete lined channel to be removable. Per the Tentative Plat Keynote 6 and 7 this area is a maintenance access ramp and must provide vehicular access into the channel. The existing hand railing seems to be permanent and can not be removed. Also revise the ramp to meet the minimum slope requirements for access. It appears that a large piece of wood has been placed along the top portion of the ramp due to a large vertical drop off so vehicles can drive into the ramp, however this does not meet the minimum 15% slope requirement and it appears that this is causing damage to the concrete along the top portion of the ramp. 13) Field verification showed that there are numerous areas of the site where brick pavers are used that need to be fixed due to settling of the subsoil or uplifting of the pavers. The pedestrian access areas that are constructed out of the brick pavers must provide a uniform surface for accessibility. 14) Verify on the revised grading plans or a revised landscape plans that all landscaping requirements per the last approved Landscape Plan have been addressed. It appeared from the field visit areas of landscaping were either incomplete or the landscaping had died out. 15) A complete set of revised grading plans ("As-built") are required that include but are not limited to what is shown on the approved construction/grading plans and what is listed above. All changes must be clearly documented on the revised grading plan sheets and must be accompanied by an Engineering Certification letter per PDSD Policy 2008-04 dated 09APR09. GENERAL COMMENTS: A meeting is requested with the contractor and developer to discuss this project with the Zoning Division, Engineering Division and Engineering Inspector to help expedite the resubmittal of the revised grading plans. It is preferred that the meeting take place onsite so that the concerns documented above can be talked about and clearly understood. I can be reached at 837-4929 to schedule a meeting. INREGARDS TO THE LANDSCAPING COMMENTS THEY WILL BE PROVIDED AT A LATER DATE NOTING ALL ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. BETWEEN THESE TWO LIST ALL WORK THAT IS REQUIRED WILL BE ADDRESSED WITHIN THESE LIST AND WILL BE INSPECTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTING ALL THE PLAN REVISIONS FOR THIS SITE. |
|
| 07/15/2013 | GRADING - FINAL | Correction Required | MET WITH JASON GREEN AND DAVID REIVERA TO DISCUSS THE COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE FOR THE RIVERWALK PROJECT. THESE COMMENTS WILL BE GIVEN TO THE DEVELOPER SO THAT HE MIGHT ADDRESS THEM IN THE FIELD AND HAVE ALL CHANGES NOTED ON THE REVISED DRAWINGS. | |
| 07/02/2013 | GRADING - FINAL | Correction Required | SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised grading plan (As-Built). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the revised grading plan at this time. The following items have been field verified during the last inspection with the Engineering Inspector, Engineering Reviewer and Zoning Reviewer and are inadequate to provide an ENG Inspection Final the following items need to be addressed prior to final grading plan approval and final inspection sign off: GRADING PLAN: 1) Provide wheel stops at all parking areas with stalls that are 20-feet in length and abut sidewalks that are not a minimum of 6.5 feet wide. Parking stalls must be designed and constructed so that the vehicles do not encroach over the required minimum 4-foot wide sidewalk for pedestrian access. 2) Provide the parking space striping for the required parking stalls located adjacent to and north of the existing mail boxes. Per the last approved Tentative Plat and Grading Plan this area is required to have 14 parking spaces; however the spaces are not delineated on site. 3) Provide a revised grading plan that correctly shows location of all sidewalks on site, it is acknowledged that some areas have been deleted or revised due to handicap accessibility requirements and existing grades in the field however all portions that have been constructed needs to be shown on the plan set. 4) Per the last approved Tentative Plat and Grading Plan there is a required pedestrian trail that goes through Common Area B adjacent to the south side of Units 126-135 that is not delineated onsite. The trail must be clearly defined for pedestrian use and must be delineated differently than the landscaping area. 5) Field visit verified multiple handicap access ramps onsite that exceed the maximum 8.3% slope required for ANSI conformance. Provide handicap access ramps that meet the maximum longitudal slope requirements for accessibility. 6) Provide hand railing at areas of the handicap accessibility ramps and sidewalk areas that have runs with a rise greater than 6-inches to comply with Section 505 of the ICC A117.1-2009. 7) Verify that all required handicap parking spaces have been installed and clearly marked on site. Per the "As-Builts" and a field visit there are multiple handicap spots that have been either moved or deleted from the site. Verify that the correct numbers of handicap spots per the parking calculations are provided. 8) Revise the plan set to verify handicap accessibility from River Road into the subdivision. The pedestrian sidewalk along the east portion of the site has a portion of the access gate encroaching into the sidewalk and does not allow for the minimum 3-foot width per ANSI or the 4-foot width per the Development Standards. Also the pedestrian access on the west side has a ramp that terminates at the access driveway with no connection to the other side or down along the entire west side adjacent to the mail boxes. The pedestrian access must either continue along the same side of the roadway and in front of the mail boxes meeting slope requirements with landings and hand railing if applicable or it must continue to the other side of the road with a clear pedestrian cross walk and curb cuts with ramps into the median and landscape area to get the accessibility to the other side of the access road. 9) Verify that all handicap spots meet the maximum slope requirements of 2% in all directions. Field verification showed some of the handicap spots exceeding the 2% maximum slope requirements. 10) Field visit verified multiply light poles that have not been fully constructed. The pole base and wiring has been installed however the poles and lights have not been installed. These poles must be installed to meet the lighten requirements for the site. 11) Provide the hand railing along the pedestrian access path adjacent to the 3-cell scuppers located in the far southwest corner of the site. It appears that the sidewalk included the pipe set into the concrete for providing removable railing, but the railing was not installed onsite. 12) Revise the railing provided at the access location for the concrete lined channel to be removable. Per the Tentative Plat Keynote 6 and 7 this area is a maintenance access ramp and must provide vehicular access into the channel. The existing hand railing seems to be permanent and can not be removed. Also revise the ramp to meet the minimum slope requirements for access. It appears that a large piece of wood has been placed along the top portion of the ramp due to a large vertical drop off so vehicles can drive into the ramp, however this does not meet the minimum 15% slope requirement and it appears that this is causing damage to the concrete along the top portion of the ramp. 13) Field verification showed that there are numerous areas of the site where brick pavers are used that need to be fixed due to settling of the subsoil or uplifting of the pavers. The pedestrian access areas that are constructed out of the brick pavers must provide a uniform surface for accessibility. 14) Verify on the revised grading plans or a revised landscape plans that all landscaping requirements per the last approved Landscape Plan have been addressed. It appeared from the field visit areas of landscaping were either incomplete or the landscaping had died out. 15) A complete set of revised grading plans ("As-built") are required that include but are not limited to what is shown on the approved construction/grading plans and what is listed above. All changes must be clearly documented on the revised grading plan sheets and must be accompanied by an Engineering Certification letter per PDSD Policy 2008-04 dated 09APR09. GENERAL COMMENTS: A meeting is requested with the contractor and developer to discuss this project with the Zoning Division, Engineering Division and Engineering Inspector to help expedite the resubmittal of the revised grading plans. It is preferred that the meeting take place onsite so that the concerns documented above can be talked about and clearly understood. I can be reached at 837-4929 to schedule a meeting. |
|
| 07/01/2013 | GRADING - FINAL | Correction Required | MET ONSITE WITH DAVID RIVERA AND JASON GREEN TO DISCUSS WHAT TYPE OF CORRECTIVE WORK IS NEEDED FOR THIS SITE TO ENSURE THAT IT IS CONSTRUCTED PER THE APPROVED PLANS. WE WALKED THE SITE NOTING THE CHANGES ONTO THE REVISED DRAWINGS THAT HAVE BEEN PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER. A LIST OF ITEMS WILL BE GENERATED FROM THIS INSPECTION AND GIVEN TO THE DEVELOPER. ONCE ALL CHANGES HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED THE DEVELOPER WILL PROVIDE US WITH A FINAL REVISED DRAWING FOR THE SITE, NOTING ALL APPROVED CHANGES. |