Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Case: T22DV05604
Case Details
Status:
Closed - Resolved
Type:
COURTCMP - SWLK - failure to respond to notice from transportation for sidewalk deficiency. neighborhood went through improvement program and owner refused to be included and rejected new sidewalk
Address:
Entered Date:
09/29/2022
Applicant:
N/A
Description:
Completed Inspections
Case Status: Closed - Resolved
Case Number: T22DV05604
Case Description: COURTCMP - SWLK - failure to respond to notice from transportation for sidewalk deficiency. neighborhood went through improvement program and owner refused to be included and rejected new sidewalk
Total Completed Inspections - 2
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/15/2022 | COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Initial | In Violation | 1243 PM - SIDEWALK DEFICIENCY STILL PRESENT. SPOKE TO OWNER ON SITE VIA TELEPHONE WITH WIFE PRESENT. OWNER STATES HE DID INDEED REFUSE THE CITY FIXING THE SIDEWALK FOR HIM BECAUSE HE FEELS THE SIDEWALK IS HISTORIC AND SHOULDN'T BE ALTERED. ADVISED WILL MAIL A CITATION. -VM | |
| 03/14/2023 | COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Follow Up | In Violation | 1030 AM - Defendant was present, City asked to hold a hearing due to the violation not being in compliance. Defendant spoke in great length to dispute the need for repairs. He told the judge that he feels it should not be replaced as a white sidewalk would look out of place due to historic status of the neighborhood. He believes the grinding job he did was sufficient and states that if anyone falls down on the sidewalk they should not be walking, and states he has enough insurance coverage that he is not worried if someone falls on the sidewalk. The City asserts the sidewalk in its current state is hazardous and dangerous to pedestrians, especially at night due to this street not having streetlights. A hearing was not held. Judge orders a continuance for a hearing, and for the TDOT inspector to be present. -VM |