Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Case: T21DV00444

Case Details

Status:

COMPLIAN

Type:

RESIDENTIAL ZONING
Address:

Entered Date:

01/28/2021

Applicant:

AJOUZ MOHAMED M

Description:

LANDSCAOE SLOPING IS CUASES FLOODING IN UNIT 3

Completed Inspections

Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Number: T21DV00444
Case Description: RESIDENTIAL ZONING
Total Completed Inspections - 2
End Date Description Inspector Results Comments
01/29/2021 INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT GOODMAN Approved VISITED SITE, MET WITH THE OCCUPANT WHO WALKED ME TO THE SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE, SHOWING ME PROBLEMS SHE HAS EXPERIENCED OVER 4 YRS OF LIVING ON THE PROPERTY AND THE OWNER DOING NOTHING ABOUT IT. THE PROPERTY IS ALONG DEEP LOT WITH 4-5 STRUCTURES ON THE PROPERTY WITH THE REAR STRUCTURE AT THE BACK OF THE LOT (NORTH END) DRAINING TO THE STREET. OCCUPANT STATED EVERY TIME IT RAINS, SHE NEEDS TO PUT SAND BAGS AT THE DOOR FACING THE NORTH AND SOMETIMES AT THE FRONT DOOR DURING VERY HARD RAINS, ALSO SHOWING ME THE NARROW REAR SECTION, APPROX. 3 FT THAT RUNS WATER ALONG THE REAR TO THE STRUCTURE SOUTH AND THEN DRAINS BETWEEN THE TWO STRUCTURE THRU A SHALLOW DITCH DUG TO TO DRAIN THE WATER TO THE FRONT YARD. THE TUCSON CODE FOR WATER DRAINAGE STATES THAT WATER CANNOT RUN OFF OF ONE PARCEL AND ONTO ANOTHER, BUT THERE IS NOTHING CONCERNING WATER DRAINAGE FROM BUILDING TO BUILDING ON THE SAME LOT. I BELIEVE THAT MAY BECOME A LANDSCAPE ISSUE FOR THE OWNER THAT HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED AND CANNOT BE ENFORCED BY C/E. I CONTACTED RICHARD VIDAL WHO AGREED THAT IT IS A ORIGINAL DRAINAGE PROBLEM THAT CODE ENFORCEMENT CANNOT GET INVOLVED IN TO MAKE THE OWNER DO SOMETHING ABOUT.
02/11/2021 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE GOODMAN Approved REVISITED SITE TO EXPLAIN TO THE OCCUPANT MY FINDINGS ON THE FLOODING THAT TAKES PLACE. I HAD NOT INSPECTED FOR THE FLOODING AT THE TIME OF MY ORIGINAL INSPECTION AND DID NOT FIND FLOODING INSIDE THE HOUSE BUT I WAS TOLD BY THE OCUPANT THAT IT DOES FLOOD. OCCUPANT WAS NOT HOME AT THE TIME OF MY FOLLOW UP INSPECTION. I DID LEAVE A CARD. FOR THE OCCUPANT ASKING SHE CONTACT. A PREVIOUS INSPECTION FOR THE JMV WAS A ISSUE BECAUSE THE OWNER AGREED TO ALLOW THE OCCUPANT IN UNITS 1 & 2 TO WORK ON HIS VEHICLE. I INFORMED THE OCCUPANT DURING THIS VISIT THAT IF THE VEHICLE WAS NOT PUT BACK TOGETHER AND COMPLETED THAT IT WOULD BE CONSIDERED A JMV AND IT WOULD HAVE TO BE REMOVED. THERE ARE NO OTHER ISSUES AT THIS TIME. COMPLIANCE CLOSE CASE.