Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Case: T19DV07338
Case Details
Entered Date:
09/18/2019
Applicant:
JULIE ANN & THOMAS PHARES
Description:
States entire house was built in the back yard and a second structure is going in, sent photos of piping, possible work without permits : ADDED 9/25/19 One apparently un-permitted residence has already been completed in the backyard. It now seems a second is being contructed. Wastewater and water stubs are clearly visible. What looks like a sewer connection was made this weekend
Case Violations
Case Number: T19DV07338
Case Status: COURTCMP
Case Description: WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Total Violations: 4
| Violation Date | Code Statue |
|---|---|
| 09/20/2019 | T.C. Ch. 16, SEC. 16-21. REGISTRATION OF RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROPERTY. An owner of residential rental property shall maintain with the assessor in the county where the property is located information required by this section in a manner to be determined by the assessor. (c) Residential rental property shall not be occupied if the information required by this section is not on file with the county assessor. This subsection does not affect any lease existing on August 6, 1999. (e) A person who fails to comply with any provision of this subsection is responsible for a civil infraction and shall be assessed a civil penalty of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), plus an additional one hundred dollars ($100.00) for each month after the date of the original violation until compliance occurs. The court shall not suspend any portion of the civil penalty provided by this subsection. |
| 09/20/2019 | UDC, Sec. 10.2.3. COMPLIANCE REVIEW, EXISTING DEVELOPMENT Any land used or occupied; any site improvement, modification, or construction started; any existing use or structure expanded, reconstructed, changed, or otherwise altered; and any land divided into multiple parcels without certification of compliance with the provisions of the UDC through a zoning review process is considered a violation of the UDC. Enforcement of violations shall be in accordance with Section 10.4, Penalties and Remedies. |
| 09/20/2019 | UDC, Sec. 10.3.5. VIOLATION OF A SITE PLAN Failure to comply with conditions placed on an approved site plan shall constitute a violation of the UDC. |
| 09/20/2019 | T.C. Ch. 16, Sec. 16-4. PERMITS REQUIRED. Unless otherwise exempt pursuant to section 301 of the Administrative Code, as adopted by reference per section 6-1 of this Code, or pursuant to any other ordinance or statute, no building, structure or building service equipment regulated by this chapter or by the technical codes adopted by the city shall be built, erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, moved, improved, removed, converted or demolished unless a permit first has been obtained from the building official in the manner provided in the administrative and building codes adopted by the city. The purpose of a permit is to ensure that all construction is inspected by qualified City of Tucson personnel as directed by ordinance to verify compliance with city codes. Failure to obtain proper permit with inspections and approvals shall deem the construction to be unsafe. |
Completed Inspections
Case Status: COURTCMP
Case Number: T19DV07338
Case Description: WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Total Completed Inspections - 2
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/20/2019 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | BERMUDEZ | Approved | AN ENTIRE STRUCTURE IN REAR YARD FOUND WITHOUT PERMITS, ENCLOSURE TO EXISTING PORCH/ADDITION AND NEW PLUMBING SEWER AND WATER LINES FOUND IN REAR YARD. POSSIBLE NEW UPGRADED SERVICE PANEL, NO PERMITS FOUND IN PERMIT PLUS. WILL ISSUE 30 DAY NOV. |
| 12/14/2020 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | BERMUDEZ | Approved | ON SITE; COURT FOLLOW UP TOOK PICTURES, OWNER HAS BUILT MORE SINCE ORIGINAL INSPECTION. SHE ADDED AN EXTENDED PATIO THAT IS HIGHER THAN BOTH ROOFS OF TRIPLEX AND REAR ADDITION IT IS ALSO ATTACHED TO BOTH. OWNER ADDED METAL PORCH AND POSTS TO TRIPLEX AS WELL AS METAL FENCING AT PERIMETER OF PROPERTY, WHERE HEIGHT EXCEEDS 6 FEET IN SOME AREAS, ONE PORTION OF THE FENCE LINE ABUTTS THE TRIPLEX EXTERIOR DWELLING WALL AND IS ABOUT 1 FOOT OR SO FROM BEING THE SAME HEIGHT AS THE ROOF LINE. SENT PICTURES TO PDSD MARK CASTRO, MARK WILL SPEAK TO STEVE SHEILDS WHO APPROVED THE PLANS SUBMITTED FOR REAR ADDITION, HOWEVER INSEPCTOR EXPLAINED TO MARK THAT IS WAS NOT ONLY THE REAR ADDITION THAT WAS ILLEGAL BUT IT WAS ALSO THE MAIN DWELLING THAT WAS CONFORMED INTO A TRIPLEX WITHOUT PROPER PERMITS. THERE SHOULD BE A HOLD PLACED ONTO THE APPROVED REAR ADDITIONS DUE TO NEW FINDINGS AS WELL AS THE TRIPLEX NOT BEING PART OF THE PLANS SUBMITTED TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT. |
Outstanding Case Activity Conditions
| Date | Name | Approved |
| 09/25/2019 | ** A FEE SHALL APPLY FOR WORK COMMENCING BEFORE PERMIT ISSUANCE. ANY PERSON WHO COMMENCES ANY WORK ON A BUILDING BEFORE OBTAINING THE NECESSARY PERMITS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A FEE AT LEAST EQUAL TO THE REQUIRED BUILDING PERMIT FEE PER IBC 109.4.** | Not Approved |
Completed Activity Special Conditions
Case Description - WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Case Number - T19DV07338
Case Status: COURTCMP
Total Completed Case Activity Conditions: 7
| Date | Name |
| 09/20/2019 | CONTACTED BY PHONE |
| 04/03/2020 | RETURNED MAIL |
| 09/20/2019 | CONTACTED BY MAILING |
| 09/20/2019 | CONTACTED BY EMAIL |
| 09/20/2019 | NOTICE OF VIOLATION ISSUED |
| 03/04/2020 | CITATION ISSUED |
| 03/11/2020 | COURT HEARING INFO |