Case Details

Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

The login landing page when selecting 'View' is still occurring and is still pending further investigation.

Status:

COMPLIAN

Type:

REFUSE

Address:

8644 E STEARN LAKE DR

Entered Date:

01/04/2018

Applicant:

COLIN PROPERTIES LLC

Description:

NO UTILITES AND HOARDING

Completed Inspections

Case Status: COMPLIAN

Case Number: T18DV00103

Case Description: REFUSE

Total Completed Inspections - 2

End Date	Description	Inspector	Results	Comments
01/04/2018	INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT	goodman	Approved	VISITED SITE, MET WITH TPD OFFICERS WHO STATED OCCUPANT LOST HOUSE IN FORECLOSER, HAS GONE TO COURT WITH NEW OWNER AND WAS GIVEN UNTIL MARCH 30, 2018 TO BE OUT. THE PRESENT OWER MARGRET SCHRODER HAS NO UTILITIES AND IS STAYING IN THE HOUSE. THE EXTERIOR OF THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN KEPT VERY CLEAN. THE REAR YARD IS A LARGE REAR YARD WITH SOME PERSONAL BELONGINGS THAT SHE IS TRYING TO SELL AND IS GOING TO HAVE YARD SALES TO MAKE MONEY TO GET A APARTMENT. HAS NO FAMILY AND NO ONE TO STAY WITH AT THIS TIME. OCCUPANT HAS BEEN VERY COOPERATIVE. WALKED INSIDE THE STRUCUTRE FOUND THE OCCUPANT IS A HOARDER, DOES HAVE PATHWAYS FROM EVERY ROOM TO FRONT AND REAR DOORS. PATHWAYS ARE 3 FT WIDE, DEBRIS IS 4 FT TO 6 FT IN HEIGHT AND IN EVERY ROOM. EXPLAINED TO OCCUPANT THAT I WOULD BE ISSUING A EMERGENCY VACATE NOTIC ANDPOSTING THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTYWITH A "UNFIT TO OCCUPY" PLACARD THAT WILL ALLOW TPD TO ARREST ANYONE ON SITE.EXPLAINED TO HER AND TPD THAT SHE COULD ONLY BE THERE DURING DAY TIME HOURS. TPD PROVIDED LITERATURE FOR POSSIBLE HOUSING. OCCUPANT DOES HAVE A TRUCK AND CAMPER TO SLEEP IN, WAS TOLD SHE WOULD HAVE TO FIND PLACE WHERE SHE COULD PARK NIGHTLY. INFORMED RICK SALDATE OF THE 90 DAY COURT ORDER ALLOWING HER TO BE AT THE PROPERTY UNTIL MARCH 30 TO MOVE OUT.
01/19/2018	INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE	GOODMAN	Approved	RECEIVED CALL FROM NEW OWNER OF HE PROPERTY STATING PREVIOUS OWNER IS STILL ONSITE. I ASKED IF SHE WAS LIVING INSIDE THE STRUCTURE, HE SAID SHE WAS NOT. I STATED TO HIM THAT THERE WAS THE COURT ORDER ALLOWING HER TO REMOVE PERSONAL BELONGING. AND SINCE HE CUT POWER TO THE STRUCTURE, I ISSUED THE NOTICE TO VACATE, BUT EXPLAINED BECAUSE OF THE COURT ORDER SHE WAS ALLOWED TO STAY ON PROPERTY. PROPERTY DOES REMAIN CLEAN, SECURED AND PER OWNER UNOCCUPIED. COMPLIANCE / CLOSE CASE.

Completed Activity Special Conditions

Case Description - REFUSE

Case Number - T18DV00103