Case: T16DV04715
Case Details
Entered Date:
08/02/2016
Applicant:
JOOCHUL & SHINJA R KIM, KIM FAMILY TRUST
Description:
TWO LARGE STRUCTURES SEVERLY DILAPITATED- BROUGHT IN AND PLACED AT THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY WITHOUT PERMITS. GRADE OF THE PROPERTY WHERE THE UNITS ARE HAS BEEN RAISED 12-18 INCHES. ALSO:Flood plain approval states the shed to be built on blocks, which it is not. 08/12 OPEN TRENCH 40 FEET LONG 3 FEET DEEP APPEARS TO BE THE START OF A WALL BEING BUILT
Outstanding Inspections
Case Number: T16DV04715
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Description: WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Total Outstanding Inspections - 2
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/01/2016 | LUC - ZONING OTHER | PUMPHREY | Item closed | |
| 11/01/2016 | NPO - WORK WITHOUT PERMIT | PUMPHREY | Item closed |
Completed Inspections
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Number: T16DV04715
Case Description: WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Total Completed Inspections - 2
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/18/2016 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | PUMPHREY | Approved | Rear yard area has 1' trenching on west and south PL for block wall installation; yard has fill dirt approx. 1½' higher than trench and above what appears to be normal level of yard. Two structures on property, one in NE corner of this area under 200 sq ft and appearing to meet setbacks; secondary structure at or under 200 sq ft in SW corner does not appear to meet setbacks. A recent approved site plan on file shows NE structure and wall installation under 7', none of which requires permit; it does indicate structure would be up on blocks. Neither structure on blocks and appear to be directly on ground. Structures are not considered dilapidated. Floodplain use permit in application status. This needs review for fill dirt in floodplain with PDSD engineers; excavation is not deemed hazardous due to depth and is not on right-of-way. NOV will be issued after review, currently including setback violation on SW structure. Photos. |
| 09/01/2016 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | PUMPHREY | Approved | At site due to another call about work without permit. Footers poured for block wall; originally on approved site plan for under 7', which doesn't require a permit. This case is still within NOV period in which owner is to submit revised site plan for secondary structure (at or under 200') which does not require a permit, and to review fill added in floodplain area; structure does not meet setback and will either need to be approved or moved. |
Outstanding Case Activity Conditions
| Date | Name | Approved |
| 08/19/2016 | UDC, Sec. 10.3.5. VIOLATION OF A SITE PLAN Failure to comply with conditions placed on an approved site plan shall constitute a violation of the UDC. UDC, Sec. 10.2.3. COMPLIANCE REVIEW, EXISTING DEVELOPMENT Any land used or occupied; any site improvement, modification, or construction started; any existing use or structure expanded, reconstructed, changed, or otherwise altered; and any land divided into multiple parcels without certification of compliance with the provisions of the UDC through a zoning review process is considered a violation of the UDC. Enforcement of violations shall be in accordance with Section 10.4, Penalties and Remedies. | Not Approved |
Completed Activity Special Conditions
Case Description - WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Case Number - T16DV04715
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Total Completed Case Activity Conditions: 5
| Date | Name |
| 09/01/2016 | CONTACTED BY PHONE |
| 08/19/2016 | CONTACTED BY MAILING |
| 08/19/2016 | NOTICE OF VIOLATION ISSUED |
| 11/01/2016 | VIOLATION CLOSED |
| 08/18/2016 | RESEARCH |