Case: T15DV06168
Case Details
Entered Date:
08/24/2015
Applicant:
ROBERT ROSS
Description:
WORK WITHOUT PERMITS
Case Violations
Case Number: T15DV06168
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Description: WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Total Violations: 4
| Violation Date | Code Statue |
|---|---|
| 08/24/2015 | UDC Sec. 10.2.1. COMPLIANCE REVIEW, PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT No land may be used or occupied; no site improvement, modification, or construction started; no existing use or structure expanded, reconstructed, changed, or otherwise altered; and no land may be divided into multiple parcels until compliance with the provisions of the UDC has been certified through a zoning review process by PDSD. No City agency may issue a permit for excavation, grubbing, grading, paving, demolition, or construction of any sort before certification of compliance with provisions of the UDC has been determined by PDSD. In the event a zoning regulation requires interpretation, such interpretation shall be issued by the Zoning Administrator in accordance with Sections 1.5, Interpretations of the Unified Development Code. |
| 08/24/2015 | UDC, Sec. 10.3.5. VIOLATION OF A SITE PLAN Failure to comply with conditions placed on an approved site plan shall constitute a violation of the UDC. |
| 08/24/2015 | UDC, Sec. 10.3.4. VIOLATION OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Failure to comply with the requirements or conditions of approval on any of the various zoning compliance procedures as provided by the UDC, such as, but not limited to, Special Exception, Design Development Option, Temporary Use, or Home Occupation procedures, constitutes a violation of the UDC. |
| 08/24/2015 | T.C. Ch. 16, Sec. 16-4. PERMITS REQUIRED. Unless otherwise exempt pursuant to section 301 of the Administrative Code, as adopted by reference per section 6-1 of this Code, or pursuant to any other ordinance or statute, no building, structure or building service equipment regulated by this chapter or by the technical codes adopted by the city shall be built, erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, moved, improved, removed, converted or demolished unless a permit first has been obtained from the building official in the manner provided in the administrative and building codes adopted by the city. The purpose of a permit is to ensure that all construction is inspected by qualified City of Tucson personnel as directed by ordinance to verify compliance with city codes. Failure to obtain proper permit with inspections and approvals shall deem the construction to be unsafe. |
Outstanding Inspections
Case Number: T15DV06168
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Description: WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Total Outstanding Inspections - 1
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/21/2015 | NPO - WORK WITHOUT PERMIT | REED | Item initialized |
Completed Inspections
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Number: T15DV06168
Case Description: WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Total Completed Inspections - 3
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/21/2015 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | NAVARRO | Approved | Visited site, inspected, found as follows there was extensive work done in drainage area to the south of the residence,the work included walls built,concrete parking space, will write notice of violation. |
| 08/03/2016 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | GOODMAN | Approved | 08/03/16: Notes made by Super Saldate: Inspector and I conducted on site Inspection to assess information gathered by Inspector and BO. After review, Inspector and I met with BO and discussed issues in detail. Action: CE will close case as No Jurisdiction at this time. Bridges appear not to imede water flow of Private wash, no hazard was observed (Current heavy Monsoons occuring) and no Permit is applicable. Wall is partially in wash, does not appear to impede flow, crate hazard and Retaining wall is approx 30-inches not triggering Permit. Parking pad does not impede traffic, water, and does not appear to create a hazard. ROW would not require removal unless hazard, imede traffic or development of ROW is necesary. If new complaint is recieved, CE will re review at that time. |
| 08/03/2016 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | GOODMAN | Approved | 08/02/16: Needed a reinspection due to additional information assocaited with my internal review and information from ROW. Will need to have Inspector Super meet on site due to concerns of authority. |
Completed Activity Special Conditions
Case Description - WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Case Number - T15DV06168
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Total Completed Case Activity Conditions: 7
| Date | Name |
| 09/01/2015 | CONTACTED BY PHONE |
| 03/10/2016 | CONTACTED IN PERSON |
| 03/03/2016 | RETURNED MAIL |
| 08/25/2015 | CONTACTED BY MAILING |
| 08/25/2015 | NOTICE OF VIOLATION ISSUED |
| 01/21/2016 | CITATION ISSUED |
| 10/13/2016 | VIOLATION CLOSED |