Case: T15DV05546
Case Details
Entered Date:
07/28/2015
Applicant:
JEFFREY W HALL & VICTOR MANUEL VON JT/RS
Description:
WORK WITHOUT PERMITS. WALL BUILT 8FT (4FT ADDED INSPECTION WITHOUT PERMITS). BUILDINGS ADDED IN HIS BACKYARD WITHOUT ALL HAVING PERMITS. PAVING ON DRIVEWAY.
Case Violations
Case Number: T15DV05546
Case Status: REFERRED
Case Description: WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Total Violations: 1
| Violation Date | Code Statue |
|---|---|
| 08/18/2015 | UDC, Sec. 10.2.3. COMPLIANCE REVIEW, EXISTING DEVELOPMENT Any land used or occupied; any site improvement, modification, or construction started; any existing use or structure expanded, reconstructed, changed, or otherwise altered; and any land divided into multiple parcels without certification of compliance with the provisions of the UDC through a zoning review process is considered a violation of the UDC. Enforcement of violations shall be in accordance with Section 10.4, Penalties and Remedies. |
Outstanding Inspections
Case Number: T15DV05546
Case Status: REFERRED
Case Description: WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Total Outstanding Inspections - 3
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/16/2015 | LUC - VIOL OF SITE PLAN - COND | PUMPHREY | Follow-up inspection | |
| 11/16/2015 | LUC - ZONING OTHER | PUMPHREY | Follow-up inspection | |
| 11/16/2015 | NPO - WORK WITHOUT PERMIT | PUMPHREY | Follow-up inspection |
Completed Inspections
Case Status: REFERRED
Case Number: T15DV05546
Case Description: WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Total Completed Inspections - 2
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/17/2015 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | PUMPHREY | Approved | Site inspection shows front ROW has been paved along with driveway to north; existing 6' block wall has decorative archways over 7', but constitutes less than 70% of the wall; there is a portion of the wall that has been extended in height on the south side which will require review; terrace/trellis attached to main structure and to wall on the south and west property lines with 0 setbacks; four structures have been built since last approved 2003 permit and site plan for kitchen addition: 1) attached porch at SE corner of main structure, 2) unattached building at or over 120' located in south side of rear yard with front parapet wall 4'0+ over roof, 3) unattached building over 120' located in NE corner of rear yard with parapet wall 4'0+ over roof and reduced setbacks from property lines; 4) porch added along south and east facades of existing guesthouse located in north rear yard. Permits will be required, along with a compliance review for location of buildings, changes to wall, and structure setbacks, and new site plan approval including new lot coverage calculations. See for additional comments. |
| 12/21/2015 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | VIDAL | Approved | The property is vacant and secured. Jeffery Hall has died and the other owner listed for the property is keeping the property secured. All openings to the house have been secured at this time. The other structures have been secured that are detached from the main house. RV. |
Outstanding Case Activity Conditions
| Date | Name | Approved |
| 08/18/2015 | UDC, Sec. 10.3.5. VIOLATION OF A SITE PLAN Failure to comply with conditions placed on an approved site plan shall constitute a violation of the UDC. | Not Approved |
| 08/18/2015 | T.C. Ch. 16, Sec. 16-4. PERMITS REQUIRED. Unless otherwise exempt pursuant to section 301 of the Administrative Code, as adopted by reference per section 6-1 of this Code, or pursuant to any other ordinance or statute, no building, structure or building service equipment regulated by this chapter or by the technical codes adopted by the city shall be built, erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, moved, improved, removed, converted or demolished unless a permit first has been obtained from the building official in the manner provided in the administrative and building codes adopted by the city. The purpose of a permit is to ensure that all construction is inspected by qualified City of Tucson personnel as directed by ordinance to verify compliance with city codes. Failure to obtain proper permit with inspections and approvals shall deem the construction to be unsafe. | Not Approved |
Completed Activity Special Conditions
Case Description - WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Case Number - T15DV05546
Case Status: REFERRED
Total Completed Case Activity Conditions: 6
| Date | Name |
| 10/12/2015 | CONTACTED BY PHONE |
| 08/19/2015 | CONTACTED BY MAILING |
| 08/18/2015 | NOTICE OF VIOLATION ISSUED |
| 07/11/2016 | VIOLATION CLOSED |
| 10/12/2015 | RESEARCH |
| 08/18/2015 | REFERENCE |