Case: T07DV08545
Case Details
Entered Date:
08/28/2007
Applicant:
MERNER LAND COMPANY
Description:
2080 W SPEEDWAY BL #2106/ROOF STARTED LEAKING IN JULY AND STILL HAS NOT BEEN REPAIRED DESPIT NOTIFYING MANAGER NUMEROUS OCCASION/ LARGE PIECES OF CEILING HAVE NOW FALLEN OFF AND MORE DRYWALL HANGING FROM CEILING. CARPET SMELLS ALSO.
Completed Inspections
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Number: T07DV08545
Case Description: RES: MINIMUM HOUSING
Total Completed Inspections - 3
| End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/13/2007 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | GGOODMAN | Approved | VISITED SITE, MET WITH TENANT BILL CAMPBELL WHO MENTIONED HE HAD 3 ISSUES BUT THAT ONE ISSUE HAD BEEN GOING ON FOR SEVERAL MONTHS. MR CAMPBELL MENTIONED THAT HE WAS CURRENT ON RENT, CALLED THE MANAGER SIDNEY SOMETIME IN MID JULY ABOUT THE ROOF LEAKING. SIDNEY REPLIED THAT THE ROOF WOULD NOT BE FIXED IN ANY WAY UNTIL AFTER THE MONSOONS. PICTURES WERE TAKEN OF THE ISSUES, MY FINDINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. ROOF LEAK IN S/W CORNER OF THE ONLY BDRM, EVIDENCED BY THE POPCORN CEILING FLAKING OFF THE DRYWALL AND DRYWALL TAPE PULLING OFF THE CORNER. 2. ROOF LEAK IN N/W CORNER OF BEDROOM EVIDENCED BY THE YELLOWING OF POPCORN CEILING AND "RIPPLING" PAINT ON WEST WALL NEXT TO THE BED. 3. LINOLEUM IN BATHROOM IS PULLING AWAY FROM WALL AND UP FROM THE FLOOR IN THE BATHROOM, IT APPEARS THAT CAULKING HAS BEEN APPLIED TO TRY TO KEEP THE LINOLEUM IN PLACE AND RE-APPLIED. TOILET HAS ALSO BEEN REPLACED EXPOSING OLD TILE OR LINOLEUM. TOILET NO LONGER COVERS AREA THAT OLD TOILET HAD. |
| 10/16/2007 | VIOL(BL) - LIVING AREAS | GGOODMAN | Approved | |
| 10/16/2007 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | GGOODMAN | Approved | RECEIVED CALL FROM BILL CAMPBELL (TENANT) WHO MENTIONED HAD GOTTEN MY CARD AND WAS RETURNING MY CALL. I TOLD MR CAMPBELL THAT I NEEDED TO REINSPECT THE WATER DAMAGE. MR CAMPBELL MENTIONED THAT THE ROOF LEAK HAD BEEN REPAIRED AND THAT ALL REPAIRS HAD BEEN COMPLETED AND HE DID NOT FEEL I NEEDED TO COME BY AGAIN. I ASKED IF HE WAS SATISFIED WITH THE WORK DONE, MR CAMPBELL SAID HE WAS AND THOUGHT THE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL DID A GOOD JOB. CHECKED WITH CARLOS PORTILLO, ASKED IF A REINSPECTION WAS REQUIRED IF THE TENANT DID NOT WANT US TO INSPECT. CARLOS SAID NO-TO LET IT GO IF THE TENANT ASKED WE NOT INSPECT. DNR HAS NO FURTHER ISSUES. COMPLIANCE CLOSE CASE. |
Completed Activity Special Conditions
Case Description - RES: MINIMUM HOUSING
Case Number - T07DV08545
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Total Completed Case Activity Conditions: 2
| Date | Name |
| 09/07/2007 | CONTACTED BY PHONE |
| 09/13/2007 | NOTICE OF VIOLATION ISSUED |