Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PREAPPLICATION LABELS
Plan Number - T22PRE0158
Review Name: PREAPPLICATION LABELS
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/01/2022 | DSTIFFE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | T22PRE0158 Comments: 1. New curb returns on Oracle Rd are to have a 25 Ft. radius. 2. New curb access ramps to be constructed at each curb return, per P.A.G. standard 207. 3. New concrete curb per P.A.G. standard 209. (Existing is curb and gutter.) 4. If any new sidewalk is to be installed, new sidewalk is to be 6 Ft wide along Oracle Rd. 5. 3' minimum buffer between curb and sidewalk, unless ROW is limited. 6. Protect in place existing streetlights. 7. Protect in place existing catch basins. 8. Protect in place or relocate accordingly, existing regulatory or warning signs. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/03/2022 | LSHAMIS1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Completed | CDRC Thursday Pre-Submittal Transmittal PDSD Zoning Review FROM: Loran Shamis, MBA; Lead Planner PROJECT: Thursday Pre-submittal meeting - T22PRE0158 - Milagro on Oracle Address: 2425 N Oracle Rd Parcel(s): 10709051A, 10709050A, 10709049B Zoning: C-2, GRID Overlay - Oracle Center, Sub-Center B Existing Use: Travelers accommodation Proposed Use: Multifamily Development TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 4 COMMENTS: 1. Development must comply with the Administrative Manual Section 2-06 - Development Package. 2. The proposed use is multifamily development, which is permitted in the C-2 zone. The site is within the Grant Road Investment District (GRID) overlay and multifamily development is a permitted use. Contact Maria.Gayosso@tucsonaz.gov for more information if you are electing to use the GRID Overlay option. 3. A lot combination processed through Pima County will be required. 4. The maximum residential density for C-2 is 44 dwelling units per acre. Per Pima County Assessor's the site is approximately 79,000 square feet; therefore, the site is permitted to have 79 dwelling units. 5. The site is within the Major Streets and Routes overlay; therefore, the minimum required street yard setback the greater of 21' or the height of the proposed, adjacent building wall measured from the back of the existing or future curb location (UDC ). Opting into the GRID overlay may reduce or waive these setback requirements. 6. Multifamily development is a nonresidential use for determining interior yard setbacks - interior property lines adjacent to nonresidential zones, the setback is 0'. 7. The maximum height 40' (UDC 6.3.4). The maximum permitted height per GRID is 75 feet. 8. The minimum parking requirement for the proposed development is 47 parking spaces using the ratio 0.75 parking spaces per dwelling unit for project for elderly or physically disabled (per UDC 7.4.4) - these parking requirements may be reduced by electing to use the GRID overlay option. A minimum of 2 ADA accessible parking spaces are required and cannot be reduced using the GRID overlay option. 9. Demonstrate that the Parking Area Access Lane (PAAL) is a minimum of 24' wide for two-way traffic and fire access (UDC 7.4.6). 10. The minimum bicycle parking requirement for short-term parking is 0.1 per bedroom for a total requirement of 7, which must be within 50' of each public entrance. The minimum bicycle parking for long-term parking is 0.5 spaces per bedroom for a total of 33 spaces, which can be located within the units (UDC 7.4.8, 7.4.9). 11. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards. If you have any questions, please contact me at Loran.Shamis@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 08/03/2022 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Dead end road in excess of 150' shall be provided with a turn around IFC 2018, Appendix D, Section D103.4 Plans shall show the existing and new hydrants and or fire sprinklers shall be installed. Plans shall show that the elevator is compliant with 2018 IBC, Chapter 30 with the interior communication as well. Provide a separate sheet showing that the buildings meet the requirements of IFC 2018, Appendix D, Sections D105.1-D105.4 and make a note of the areas provided and also a note stating that these areas shall never have awnings, large trees and or other obstructions put in place. F.D.C. Location (Shall be facing the street) IFC 2018, Chapter 9, Section 912 Buildings with a standpipe shall have a fire hydrant installed per IFC 2018, Chapter 5, Section 507.5.1.1 Two access points are required and shall meet the requirements of IFC 2018, Appendix D, Section D104 Buildings and Facilities shall comply with IFC 2018, Chapter 5, Section 503.1.1 - all portions within 150' of a fire department access road Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 Fire Plans Examiner |
| 08/03/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Completed | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PROJECT: Milagro on Oracle ACTIVITY NO. T22PRE0158 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 2425 N Oracle Rd ZONING: C-2 7.6 Landscaping and Screening The Unified Development Code (UDC) requires all new development or an expansion of greater than 25% of an existing development submit a landscape plan, UDC 7.6.2. Preparation of the landscape plan shall adhere to UDC 7.6.4. and Administrative Manual 2-10. " Many more trees will be required to be placed within the parking areas " A 10' minimum street landscape border is required along all public streets " Minimum 10' Interior landscape borders are required adjacent to any single-multi family use, regardless of zoning. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40' of a tree is only one of the requirements. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to provide shade on asphalt. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.1.B.1, UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 and UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a. Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required UDC Technical Standards Manual - Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. Using Low Impact Development design and water harvesting provides critical basin detention and first flush retention for all new development and impervious area. The newly adopted Detention/Retention Manual can be found: https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-final-201406-manual.pdf With CoT edits to the manual are found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/NPPO Review at email anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/03/2022 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Completed | T22PRE0158 1 Site is in balanced basin. Balanced basin detention and first flush retention will be required. Detention and retention must be based on undeveloped conditions. 2. Maximize water harvesting. 3. Show solid waste collection and service locations with access. Include waste stream calculations. Note that dumpster capacity of 45 gal per unit must be provided even with multiple service days per week. Loren Makus loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/04/2022 | MGAYOSS1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Completed | T22PRE0158 - 2425 N ORACLE - Milagro on Oracle - Senior Housing Adaptive Reuse & New Construction 8/4/22 CDRC Presubmittal Meeting - PRELIMINARY Comments 1) Parcel located in the Oracle Center (Sub-Center B) of the Grant Road Investment District (GRID). The PRELILIMINARY comments below apply if applicant would like to use the GRID as a zoning tool for redevelopment/development. 2) A Design Package will need to be submitted and approved, demonstrating compliance with applicable GRID development design standards and requirements. 3) The Development Package and the Design Package must clearly state the applicant's intention to use the GRID zoning option in lieu of the existing underlying zoning. 4) The scope of work to be included in the Design Package should clearly LIST the requested modifications to UDC requirements. 5) Using the GRID zoning option should not cause the property to be de-listed or no longer eligible for listing. 6) The GRID zoning option may not be used for a development project that proposes demolition of a historic structure that is listed in the National or Arizona Register of Historic Places. Exception: Partial demolition of a historic structure is allowed if the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) determines that the demolition will not cause the structure to be de-listed or to become ineligible for listing in the future. In no event may the GRID zoning option be used if the development would, in the opinion of the City Historic Preservation Officer, cause a historic structure in the GRID to be de-listed or no longer eligible for listing. 7) Environmentally Conscious Design Practices. Each project shall include three or more of the standards included in the GRID (the use of reclaimed water from municipal source or harvested from mechanical systems and treated for landscaping counts as two toward the three required). 8) Requirements in the following sections of the UDC may be modified up to 25 percent of the dimension amount permitted by the underlying zoning: Article 6, Dimensional Standards and Measurements; Section 7.4, Motor Vehicle & Bicycle Parking; Section 7.5, Off-Street Loading; and Section 7.6, Landscaping and Screening. Section 7.7, Native Plant Preservation, may not be modified. Exceptions: Building Height: 75 feet; Setbacks: Reduced or waived if no issues with MS&R Plan. The Director of the Transportation & Mobility Department may modify the Major Streets and Routes setback if there is adequate sight visibility, no traffic safety issue is created, the reduction complies with the standards of Section B-2.b.2, and the setback does not create a future roadway expansion problem. 9) ADA parking cannot be reduced or eliminated 10) Bike parking may not be reduced or eliminated 11) Loading areas may be reduced or eliminated 12) Solid Waste Collection. On-site refuse collection container standards governing access, type, and location may be modified if the Environmental Services Department determines that no public health or traffic safety issue is created. PROCESS: 1. CDRC reapplication conference 2. Major Design Review procedure is required because: 1) Proposed structures that are higher than 4 stories adjacent to SFR, and 2) Site is within the Miracle Mile National Historic District. a) Applicant submits receipt of payment of $220.00 mailing labels fee; b) Applicant emails staff draft of neighborhood invite for feedback; c) Applicant mails out notices at least 15 calendar days prior to the date of the neighborhood meeting; d) Neighborhood meeting held by applicant, with a sign-in sheet to be filled out by attendees. Neighborhood meeting shall take place at least 15 calendar days and not more than 60 calendar days prior to the submittal of the application; e) Once Design Package is accepted for review and GRID/historic review fees are paid: a. Review by City Design Professional; b. Review by the Tucson-Pima County Historical Commission (TPCHC) Plans Review Subcommittee (PRS); the PRS may continue the hearing on an item only once before making a decision, unless the applicant for the development project requests a further continuation. c. Review by GRID Design Review Board (GRID DRB) and recommendation to the PDSD Director. The GRID DRB is composed of the existing members of the DRB and: 1. The City Design Professional; 2. One member to represent all Neighborhood Associations within the GRID; 3. The GRID DRB may include one or more ad-hoc members from the following, as applicable: a)One member appointed by the neighborhood association for the area in which the proposed project is located. If the project site is located in an area that does not have a neighborhood association, the ad-hoc member is appointed by an association within 300 feet of the project site. The GRID DRB shall use the City of Tucson Design Review Board rules of procedure to carry out its functions. Ad-hoc members are voting members of the GRID DRB. A quorum of the GRID DRB is the same as the City of Tucson's Design Review Board as defined in Section 2.2.6 of the UDC. d. Decision by PDSD Director pursuant to Section B-2.b.12. For more information about the GRID: Ordinance and document: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Ordinance_11581_and_Exhibit_A.pdf Handout: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/integrated-planning/GRID_Handout.pdf Please send me an email (maria.gayosso@yahoo,com) for any questions about the GRID. Thanks. |
| 08/04/2022 | SBEASLE1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Completed | View in DOCUMENTS section of PRO, titled: "Tucson Water, Presubmittal meeting review comments" |
| 08/09/2022 | FRANK PODGORSKI | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD DATE | Needs Review | |
| 08/09/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Needs Review | |
| 08/09/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REVIEW | Needs Review |