Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PREAPPLICATION LABELS
Plan Number - T22PRE0023
Review Name: PREAPPLICATION LABELS
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/14/2022 | MROSS2 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Completed | 507.1 Required water supply. An approved water supply capable of supplying the required fire flow for the protection shall be provided to premises on which facilities, buildings or portions of buildings are hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction. 507.3 Fire Flow. Fire-flow requirements for buildings or portions of buildings and facilities shall be in accordance with Appendix B of the IFC. B105.3 Water supply for buildings equipped with an automatic sprinkler system. For buildings equipped with an approved automatic sprinkler system, the water supply shall be capable of providing the greater of: 1. The automatic sprinkler system demand, including hose stream allowance. 2. The required fire flow. 903.2.8 Group R. An automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3 shall be provided throughout all buildings with a Group R fire area. FIRE HYDRANTS 507.5.1 Where required. Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official. Exceptions: 1. For Group R-3 and Group U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be 600 ft. 2. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet. Aerial Fire Apparatus Access Roads D105.1 Where required. Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet, approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. D105.2 Width. Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. D105.3 Proximity to building. One or more of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located not less than 15 feet and not greater than 30 feet from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall be approved by the fire code official. D104.1 Building exceeding three stories or 30 feet in height. Buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet or three stories in height shall have not fewer than two means of fire apparatus access for each structure. D104.3 Remoteness. Where two fire apparatus access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the lot or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses. Michael Ross Tucson Fire Department 520-837-7082 Michael.Ross2@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/16/2022 | LSHAMIS1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Completed | CDRC Thursday Pre-Submittal Transmittal PDSD Zoning Review FROM: Loran Shamis; Planner, MBA PROJECT: Thursday Pre-submittal meeting - T22PRE0023 Address: 6131 E Benson Hy Parcel(s): 14044248A Zoning: C-2; Rezoning Case C9-21-05 Existing Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Multifamily Development TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 17, 2022 COMMENTS: 1. Development must comply with the Administrative Manual Section 2-06 - Development Package. Two development packages may be required. 2. Clarify if the townhome portion of the site is intended to be developed as multifamily residential (rentals) or attached single family residential (for sale). If they are intended to be for sale units, a flexible lot development (FLD) will be required to subdivide the lots (UDC, 8.7.3). 3. Zoning recommends the site be divided to separate the townhome portion from the multifamily residential. The process for dividing this lot would be either a minor subdivision (UDC, 8.4.3) or a block plat (UDC, 8.4.1). 4. The maximum permitted height is 40' (UDC, Table 6.3-4.A). 5. Multifamily is considered a nonresidential use for determining interior perimeter yard setbacks. Where the site is adjacent to parcels that are zoned nonresidential, the setback requirement is 0' (UDC, 6.4.5) 6. The site is considered a Developing Area for determining street yard setbacks. Where the site is adjacent to a street, the required minimum setback is the greater of 21' or the height of the proposed adjacent wall measured from the proposed exterior wall to the outside edge of the existing or future curb location (UDC, 6.4.5.C). 7. The required vehicular parking ratio for Multifamily dwellings is 1.5 space per 1-bedroom units and 2 spaces per 2-bedroom units; visitor parking is included in those ratios. Demonstrate the townhomes are complying with the required number of vehicular parking spaces in UDC, Table 7.4.4-1. Two percent (2%) of the parking spaces must be ADA accessible and for every 6 required ADA parking spaces 1 is required to be van accessible. 8. The required bicycle parking ratio is 0.10 short-term spaces per bedroom (standard bike racks) and 0.5 long-term spaces per bedroom (UDC, Table 7.4.8-1). 9. The Parking Area Access Lanes (PAAL) is required to be a minimum of 24' wide for two-way traffic (UDC, 7.4.6). 10. A pedestrian circulation path that is a minimum of 4' wide and is ADA accessible is required to connect all areas of development and to any adjacent street frontage (TSM, 7-01.0). 11. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards. If you have any questions, please contact me at Loran.Shamis@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 02/16/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Completed | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PROJECT: Tucson Apartments ACTIVITY NO. T22PRE0023 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 6131 E Benson Hwy ZONING: C-2 7.6 Landscaping and Screening The Unified Development Code (UDC) requires all new development or an expansion of greater than 25% of an existing development submit a landscape plan, UDC 7.6.2. Preparation of the landscape plan shall adhere to UDC 7.6.4. and Administrative Manual 2-10. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to provide shade on asphalt. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.1.B.1, UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 and UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a. 7.7. Native Plant Preservation The NPPO is intended to encourage preservation in place of healthy native plants through sensitive site design that minimizes the disruption of areas within the site containing healthy plants while allowing for salvage and transplanting plants on the site that are likely to survive. A Native Plant Preservation Plan, Section 7.7.4, is required to be submitted and approved in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the Unified Development Code (UDC) and Admin. Manual Section 2-11.0.0 prior to Grading Plan approval. An Environmental Resource Report will be required for the Rodeo Wash to determine the resource value and protection. Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/NPPO Review at email anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/16/2022 | SBEASLE1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Completed | See the "Documents" section of PRO: "T22PRE0023, Tucson Water, presubmittal review comments") |
| 02/17/2022 | NROSS1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Completed | Email from: <David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2022 7:23 AM 1. The address probably needs to be re-evaluated- 8150 E. Los Reales Rd. is closer 2. A Traffic Impact Analysis is required 3. New Right of Way improvements according to COT Technical Manual 10-01.3.0 & 10-01.4.0 a. Concrete curb per P.A.G. standard 209 b. Concrete sidewalks per P.A.G. standard 200 c. Concrete curb access ramps per P.A.G. standard 207 d. Concrete driveway aprons per P.A.G. standard 206 4. Curb returns 10-01.3.2 & 10-01.4.3 (Exceeds 100 ADT; No. 3 in the opinion of TDOT curb returns required. 5. Deceleration lane 6. Pull box's/ electrical conduit 10-01.3.2 David Stiffey City of Tucson Dept. of Transportation & Mobility |
| 02/17/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Completed | 1. Using Low Impact Development design and water harvesting provide critical basin detention and first flush retention. The newly adopted Detention/Retention Manual can be found: https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-final-201406-manual.pdf With edits to the manual found: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf 2. The 100-yr floodplain lines, the riparian habitat lines, and the erosion hazard setback lines are all delineated on the final plat and tentative plat for sw wilmot/los reales subdivision, lot 1-2 (S17-067, DP17-0213). Show and use those delineated boundaries or provide a new hydrology analysis showing the change. 3. It is unclear, but looks like lot 2 is being shown divided and since the original parcel has already been divided into lots 1 and 2 any additional divisions to the parcel will require a replat. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |