Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Permit Number - T22CM07165
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/19/2022 | SHASEMA1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/21/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T22CM07165 300 S Avenida De Palmas - RX-1 Porch Addition to Studio & Detached Ramada (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: September 21, 2022 This site is located in the RX-1 zone (UDC 4.7.6). A single-family residence (SFR) is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-1). See Use-Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6, .8, & .9. COMMENT: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. Provide a setback dimension from the proposed porch to the west property line. The minimum setback is twenty feet (20) facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-1.A). 2. As the proposed porch structure does not meet perimeter yard setbacks at a minimum a neighbor’s setback waiver is required. Per UDC Article 6.6.2.D An accessory structure that exceeds the allowable height of a wall within a perimeter yard and is detached from a principal structure shall comply with the perimeter yard width standards of the principal structure, except that the accessory structure may be built to a parcel line with the consent of the adjoining or, when separated by an alley, adjacent property owner(s). To secure this neighbor setback waiver the following statement must be provided on the plot plan and be signed and dated by the adjacent property owner(s): My Name is____________________ and I am the owner of the property located at_______________________. I have reviewed the site plan and I have no objection to structure being located or constructed________ feet from the property line as depicted on the site plan. Signature: _____________________________ Date: _________________________________ If you are not able to secure the waiver a Design Development Option (DDO) must be submitted and approved to reduce the required setback, DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 10/03/2022 | JCARLTO1 | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/14/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM07165 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. 2008 IRC - 106.1. The plans submitted are outside of the scope of the adopted IRC and need to be prepared by a licensed structural engineer. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Revise plans to indicate "2018 IRC with local amendments". MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Provide manufacturer's details regarding the kiln, or, if site built, sufficient information information on kiln to determine code compliance. ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Approved PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |