Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Permit Number - T22CM06326
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/18/2022 | SHASEMA1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/22/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T22CM06326 2026 N Baxter Dr – R-1 New Shed (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 22, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in the R-1 zone (UDC 4.7.1). A single-family residence (SFR) is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use-Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.1 - .9, & .11. 1. The lot coverage calculation is not correct. Review UDC Article 6.4.3 and the example shown on the Residential Plot Plan Requirements found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Residential_Plot_Plan_Requirements.pdf, and provide a correct lot coverage calculation. The lot coverage includes all vehicular use areas, measured within the outside edges of any area allocated to vehicle use, whether improved or unimproved. 2. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. The minimum setback is the greater of six (6) feet, or two-thirds (2/3) the height of the structure’s wall facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A). Based on a wall height of less than 9’-0” the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed shed to the east property line is 6’-0”, proposed setback is 1’-0”. Per UDC Article 6.6.2.D An accessory structure that exceeds the allowable height of a wall within a perimeter yard and is detached from a principal structure shall comply with the perimeter yard width standards of the principal structure, except that the accessory structure may be built to a parcel line with the consent of the adjoining or, when separated by an alley, adjacent property owner(s). To secure this neighbor setback waiver the following statement must be provided on the plot plan and be signed and dated by the adjacent property owner(s): My Name is____________________ and I am the owner of the property located at_______________________. I have reviewed the site plan and I have no objection to structure being located or constructed________ feet from the property line as depicted on the site plan. Signature: _____________________________ Date: _________________________________ If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 08/29/2022 | AWARNER1 | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/10/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM06326 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. The proposed shed is within the required fire separation distance from the adjoining rear property. Exterior walls with a fire separation distance of less than 3 feet shall have not less than a one-hour fire resistive rating with exposure from both sides. Projections shall not extend to a point closer than 2 feet from the line used to determine the fire separation distance. 2018 IRC R302.1 as amended by the City of Tucson. Revise the plan to show a one-hour fire resistance wall and projections OR relocate the new shed a minimum of 3 feet from the property line. 2. Note on the drawings that the structure shall be designed to withstand a basic wind speed of 115 mph and a seismic category of B in accordance with 2018 IRC table R301.2(1) as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Note on the drawings that wall bracing shall in in accordance with 2018 IRC section R602. 4. Note that the soil under the slab and around the footings will be treated for termites prior to the commencement of the structure. 2018 IRC R318. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved 1. This submittal is for a non-habitable shed and open porch only. No electrical, mechanical, plumbing or insulation has been included with this submittal. 2. There appears to be two skylights shown on the plans. The minimum energy requirements for a skylight U factor shall be .65 and the SHGC shall be .25 per the 2018 IECC Table R402.1.2.. This will be verified in the field on inspection, do not remove the manufactures energy compliance information from the skylights until after they have been inspected. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved No Mechanical work is included with this submittal, this is a non-habitable storage shed only. ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Conditionally Approved No Electrical work is included with this submittal, this is a non habitable storage shed only. PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved No Plumbing work is included with this submittal, this is a non habitable storage shed only If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |