Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Permit Number - T22CM05073
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/06/2022 | GSLEIGH1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | Each unit at this address requires it's own address, which must be coordinated through Pima County Addressing |
| 07/14/2022 | WBERGER1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Wyatt Berger Planner PROJECT: T22CM05073 4012 E Lee St New duplex (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 14, 2022 This site is in the R-2 zone (UDC 4.7.9). Multifamily development is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). 1. Per UDC 3.3.3.G.2.b, as you are proposing new residential development with three or more dwelling units on one lot, an approved Development Package (DP) is required. The DP is a separate submittal and shall be submitted at https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp, using Submission Type "Site Review." If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Wyatt Berger at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 07/14/2022 | PCAMARE1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/22/2022 | AWARNER1 | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/25/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Needs Review | Activity Number: T22CM05073 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Update the structural design criteria on sheet A3 to indicate that the structure was designed for a basic wind speed of 115 mph and a seismic design category B. 2018 IRC table R301.2(1) as amended. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Indicate that the 1 hour fire rated wall between the two units extends up though the attic area to the underside of the roof sheathing OR indicate the ceiling is protected by a minimum of 5/8” type X fire code drywall. 2018 IRC R302.3 2. Indicate the location and size of the attic access point on the drawings for both units. 2018 IRC R807.1. 3. Clarify the size of the accessible interior doors. The plan indicates a 2’8” door however a minimum of 32” is required between the face of the door and the stop of the frame with the door open 90 degrees. A typical 32’ door rough opening will not make this clearance. 4. Provide a minimum clearance for the door for bedroom #2, the closet is in the way and doesn’t provide a minimum of 60’ approach if these areas are meant to be accessible. 5. Provide a detailed floor plan for the bathroom indicating the turn around space and door clearance if this area is to be accessible. 6. Provide a landing outside of the front door that is a minimum of 36” deep in the direction of travel and at least as wide as the door it serves. 2018 IRC R311.3. Show a sidewalk or other means of access to the front door on the site plan. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied No mechanical information was provided as part of this submittal. Provide a mechanical layout and a manual J for both units for review. ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Denied 1. Provide a receptacle at the rear of the house. Each unit of a two family dwelling shall have a receptacle installed at the front and rear of the dwelling at grade level. 2017 NEC 210.52(E)(1). PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |