Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Permit Number - T22CM05072
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/06/2022 | GSLEIGH1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | Each unit at this address requires it's own address, which must be coordinated through Pima County Addressing |
| 07/14/2022 | WBERGER1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Wyatt Berger Planner PROJECT: T22CM05072 4012 E Lee St Remodel existing residence (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 14, 2022 This site is in the R-2 zone (UDC 4.7.9). Multifamily development is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). 1. Per UDC 3.3.3.G.2.b, as you are proposing new residential development with three or more dwelling units on one lot, an approved Development Package (DP) is required. The DP is a separate submittal and shall be submitted at https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp, using Submission Type "Site Review." If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Wyatt Berger at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 07/14/2022 | PCAMARE1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/22/2022 | AWARNER1 | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/25/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM05072 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Update the structural design criteria on sheet A3 to indicate that the structure was designed for a basic wind speed of 115 mph and a seismic design category B. 2018 IRC table R301.2(1) as amended. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Update the site plan to indicate the area of remodel work, it appears that there is work in the laundry and exiting bath 2 that is not included in the sf area. 2. Clarify the size of the accessible interior doors. The plan indicates a 2’8” door however a minimum of 32” is required between the face of the door and the stop of the frame with the door open 90 degrees. A typical 32’ door rough opening will not make this clearance. 3. Provide a minimum of 18” of clear space on the latch side for the pull side of the master bathroom door and bedroom #2 if these are meant to be accessible. 4. Provide a landing outside of the front door that is a minimum of 36” wide in the direction of travel. 2018 IRC R311.3. Show a sidewalk or other means of access to the front door on the site plan. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Denied 1. Indicate the location of an existing receptacle that is within 25’ of the new heat pump on the covered porch area for the servicing of the unit or indicate a new one will be provided. 2017 NEC 210.63. PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |