Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T22CM05035
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
09/23/2022 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
09/23/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM05035 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied Some details for the connection of RTU's and Water heater and the new roof openings is provided as a response on drawing A9.1. Seems like only a part of the whole detail is provided, it isn't clear from the submitted response, what is the weight/ size of the RTU's/ Water Heater considered in the design, how were the framing members and their connector sizes arrived at, was the existing framing evaluated for it being adequate and not requiring any structural upgrade because of the additional loads imposed by the roof supported units/ water heater? BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved Approved/Subject to field approval ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Approved PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied Second Plumbing Review: 1). SAME-Dual lavatory fixture spacing details on plan page A6.0 are non compliant, lavs need 30" center to center separation & still maintain 15" sidewall clearance- -IPC 405.3.1 ** SEE Detail J** 2). OK 3). OK If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
09/29/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed |