Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T22CM05035
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/18/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM05035 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied Structural details related to RTU's installation are not provided in this submission, please confirm if it will be provided later under a separate approval and permit? If not, then please provide pertinent structural details related to the proposed RTU's. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied Life safety/egress plan – Provide life safety plan complying with 2018 IBC chapter 10. Provide complete overall plan to show all occupied area (note partial plan). Provide exit code analysis: compliant to number of exits, travel distance to exit, common path of travel, dead end corridor, locations of fire extinguishers, exit remoteness, exit access width, door width, etc. Life Safety Plan - Show exit travel distance and common path of travel such as from open office 2 (110) and engineering development (120). Sheet A1.0 – Show area of “expansion” in reference only site plan. What is the existing area (SF) and new expanded area (SF)? Sheet A1.0 – Show occupancy classification groups for each tenant space in reference only site plan. This is labeled as mixed occupancy so show mixed occupancy groups. What are the occupancy groups of adjacent South and East shared/demising walls? Sheet A1.0 – Provide scope of fire alarm system. Is it required and provided per 2018 IBC section 907 (Yes or No)? Sheet A1.0 – Provide accurate occupant load calculations. Business occupancy load factor per 2018 IBC table 1004.5 is 150 gross not 100 as shown. Adjust to coordinate other calculations such as plumbing fixture accordingly. Sheet A2.0 – Doors shall swing in the direction of egress travel per 2018 IBC section 1010.1.2.1. Sheet D2.0, D3.0, A2.0, A3.0 – Show complete plans of the tenant space. Only partial tenant space is shown. For example, show all 5 exit doors as indicated in sheet A1.0. Sheet A6.0 – Show complete restroom 109. Only partial shown. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved Approved/Subject to field approval ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Approved PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied First plan review: 1). Dual lavatory fixture spacing details on plan page A6.0 are non compliant, lavs need 30" center to center separation & still maintain 15" sidewall clearance- -IPC 405.3.1 2). Water heater pan drain on plan pages P1.1 & P2.0 need to be routed a waste receptor or exterior. -IPC 504.7.2 3). Add support detail requirements to elevated water heater detail on plan page P2.0 -IPC 106.3.1, 502.3 If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/20/2022 | WBERGER1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/20/2022 | WBERGER1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/20/2022 | WBERGER1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 08/03/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The existing 1-1/2" reduced pressure backflow prevention assembly is too small to serve a demand of 85 GPM. The manufacturer, Watts, recommends a maximum water velocity of 7.5 FPS, approximately 50 GPM. Reference: Section 303.4, IPC 2018. |
| 09/01/2022 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Resolve building comments john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/01/2022 | VVERA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |