Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T22CM04842
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/27/2022 | VFLORES1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | Please contact Pima County Addressing to have building 1 added into the system Phone #:520-724-9512 Email: addressing@pima.gov |
| 07/12/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM04842 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. The requirements in OSHA 1926.757 for the erection of open web steel joists are to be followed. Where steel joists are used with columns that are not framed in at least two directions with solid web structural steel members, a steel joist shall be field-bolted at the column to provide lateral stability to the column during erection. Where constructability does not allow a steel joist to be installed at the column the joists are to be stabilized on both sides of the column. 2. Except for steel joists that have been pre-assembled into panels, connections of individual steel joists to steel structures in bays 40 feet or more shall be fabricated to allow for field bolting during erection. 3. Provide a vertical stabilizer plate at columns for steel joist as required by OSHA 1926.757. 4. Verify OSHA steel erection standards for open web steel joists. Section 1926.757 (a)(8) requires connections of individual steel joists to steel structures in bays of 40 feet or more shall be fabricated to allow for field bolting during erection. 5. Refer Drawings S2.1-1 and S2.2-1. The Key Plans are highlighted wrong, make revisions as needed. 6. Show lines of bridging for the Roof Steel Joists. 7. Provide missing Foundation mark for foundation located midway between lines 11/12 near line G. Submit a response letter addressing these correction items and provide bubbles on the revisions to the drawings BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. The site plan sheet A1.1 does not indicate any drop off area in front of the “future office“ main entry doors. Clarify if a sidewalk to the road of drop of and loading of future personal will be provided including an accessible drop off location separate from the parking spaces. 2. Indicate stoops for all exit doors on the site plan, none are shown on the east side of the structure. Landings for exit doors shall comply with 2018 IBC 1010.1.6. 3. Provide sidewalks or other suitable material that meet the accessibility requirements to provide a connection from the exit door landings and sidewalks that connect back to the road without going through landscaped areas. The exit discharge shall provide a direct and unobstructed access to a public way. 2018 IBC 1028.5. Floor and ground surfaces shall be stable, firm and slip resistant. 4. Clarify if there are to be skylights installed for the project. The structural framing plan S5.2 indicates to see the architectural drawings for number and locations, but none could be found. 5. Provide reflected ceiling plans that show the location of the interior lighting including all emergency fixtures and general lighting. Sheet E3.1 and E3.2 indicate to see the architectural reflected celling plans however no reflected ceiling plans were provided. Only the exterior canopy lighting was show on sheet A3.2. 6. Note on the drawings that construction documents for proposed fire apparatus access roads, location of fire lanes, security gates and construction documents and hydraulic calculations for the fire hydrant system shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction. 2018 IFC 501.3. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied Provide mechanical plans so that a mechanical review can be conducted (IMC2018,106.3.1) ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Denied 1. Sheet E6.0: For SES-BLDG-1, provide date calculation was performed for maximum available fault current. NEC 2017 110.24. 2. Sheet E6.0: For SES-BLDG-2, provide the method to reduce clearing time for overcurrent devices rated 1200A or higher for arc energy reduction at panel SWBD. 2017 NEC, 240.87 (B). 3. Sheet E6.0: Show compliance for branch circuits and feeders to comply with voltage drop requirements in 2018 IECC, C405.9. 4. Sheet E6.0: There are flag notes on the single line diagram, but there is no flag note table to show what the flag notes represent. 5. Sheet E6.0: General note F refers to fire pump installation, but no fire pump is shown on layout or feeders to fire pump. If fire pump is not in the scope of these documents, remove note. 6. Sheet E3.2: Illumination shall be provided for all working spaces about electrical panelboards installed indoors. There is no a lighting plan for the room housing LHP1, XMER P1 and HHP1. 2017 NEC, 110.26(D). PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied First Plumbing Review: 1). Plan pages P3.1 & P3.2 show 3" roof drain conductors which are undersized and don't correlate with plan pages P4.1 & P4.2 which shows 6" conductors. plan pages need to correlate -IPC 1106.2 2). Add storm piping materials to plan page Page P2.0- IPC 1102.1 3). Plan submittal needs to be accompanied by the site utility piping plan to see that sewer & water continuation correlate. - IPC 106.3.1 If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/15/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T22CM04842 – DP22-0164 6720 S Alvernon Way – I-1 Shell Building (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: July 15, 2022 This site is located in I-1 Zone (UDC 4.7.21). 1. As DP22-0164 has not completed the first review Zoning is not able to compare the building plans to the DP. Once the 1st review of the DP is completed and comments addressed Zoning will review the building plans for compliance with the DP. Additional comments maybe forth coming. Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the DP is approved by all review agencies. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 07/15/2022 | SSHIELD1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 07/18/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide a Fire Protection Sheet that shows the following: Aerial Access that is compliant with IFC 2018 Appendix D, Section D105 Existing and new Fire hydrant locations F.D.C. Location (Shall be facing the street) IFC 2018, Chapter 9, Section 912 Fire Lane's if provided Note shall be added: Building shall be tested for Emergency Responder Radio Coverage by PCWIN and the report provided to TFD Fire pump room shall have proper ventilation, heat and cooling capability If the fire pump is diesel please advise Add note that the required fire department access door shall be compliant with the IFC 2018, Chapter32, Section 3206.7.4 Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 Fire Plans Examiner |
| 07/28/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 08/24/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The DP needs to be approved before the building plans can be approved. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/24/2022 | VVERA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |