Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Permit Number - T22CM04817
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/11/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T22CM04817 3439 E 28th St – R-2 Detached Garage (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL July 11, 2022 Provided a detail comment response letter with your submittal that clearly shows how you have addressed all comments with your next submittal. This site is located in the R-2 zone (UDC 4.7.9). A single-family residence (SFR) is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use-Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10. 1. Per UDC Article 6.6.3.E The total gross floor area (gfa) of all accessory structures shall not exceed 50% of the gfa of the principal structure. The proposed detached garage exceeds the allowed 50% of the gfa of the principal structure, As shown on the plans a Board of Adjustment for Variance is required and will need to be submitted and approved prior to approval of this plan. Board of Adjustment application/requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Zoning_Administration_Application_BA_fillable.pdf. The Board of Adjustment is a separate submittal from this building plan and is submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. Contact of the Board of Adjustment is Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. An option to avoid the Variance process is would be to connect the garage to the existing residence with a roofed structure, minimum 5’-0” wide and can support a 20 lb. live load, support a fire person walking across it. 2. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. The minimum setback is the greater of six (6) feet, or two-thirds (2/3) the height of the structure’s wall facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A). Based on a wall height of 10’-10” shown on the south elevation the required perimeter yard setback to the west property line is 7’-3”, proposed is 6’-2”. Depending on how comment 1 is addressed will determine how the setback issue is dealt with. If the garage remains as a detached accessory structure and you elect to go through the Variance process the reduced setback can be included in the Variance. If you elect to connect the garage to the existing residence and the setback remains at 6’-2” a Design Development Option (DDO) will need to be processed and approved to reduce the setback. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. 3. The lot coverage calculation is not correct. Review UDC Article 6.4.3 and the example shown on the Residential Plot Plan Requirements found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Residential_Plot_Plan_Requirements.pdf, and provide a correct lot coverage calculation. 4. The property dimensions provided on the plan are not correct. Review the Citation Park Lots 209 Thru 457 final plat found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/apps/maps-and-records/subdivisions/details/1894, and provide the correct dimensions. 5. Based on aerial photos there is a shed type structure located along the east property line that shows up some time after 2015. If this structure is still on site show it on the plan, provide perimeter yard setback dimensions and include it in the lot coverage calculation. If this structure does not meet the minimum perimeter yard setback of the greater of six (6) feet, or two-thirds (2/3) the height of the structure’s wall facing the interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A) at a minimum a neighbor’s setback waive must be obtained. To secure this neighbor setback waiver the following statement must be provided on the plot plan and be signed and dated by the adjacent property owner(s): My Name is____________________ and I am the owner of the property located at_______________________. I have reviewed the site plan and I have no objection to structure being located or constructed________ feet from the property line as depicted on the site plan. Signature: _____________________________ Date: _________________________________ 6. Show all utilities on the plot plan. 7. Show the zoning on the adjacent properties on the plot plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 07/11/2022 | SSHIELD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/15/2022 | AWARNER1 | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/25/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM04817 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Indicate the design criteria on the drawings including the live and dead loads as well as a basic wind speed of 115 mph and a seismic design category B. 2018 IRC table R301.2(1). BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Indicate a stoop or landing outside of the door. The landing shall be a minimum of 36” in the direction of travel and be at least as wide as the door it serves. 2018 IRC R311.3. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved No mechanical work was indicated as part of this submittal ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Denied 1. Indicate the approximate location of the electrical line to be run form the house to the new garage on the site plan. Indicate the type of material (such as direct burial, PVC conduit) and its burial depth on the plans. 2. Indicate all 15- and 20-amp outlets shall be tamper proof type. 2017 NEC 210.52. 3. Indicate GFCI protection will be provided for all receptacles located in the garage. 2017 NEC 210.8 (B). 4. Indicate on the drawing that the new exterior light fixture will be in accordance with the Pima County exterior lighting code. PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved No plumbing work was indicated as part of this submittal If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |