Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T22CM04720
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/22/2022 | VFLORES1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | Please contact Pima County Addressing to have building added into the system Phone #:520-724-9512 Email: addressing@pima.gov |
| 07/11/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM04717/BLDG A, T22CM04718/BLDG B, T22CM04719/BLDG C, T22CM04720/BLDG D, T22CM04721/BLDG E, T22CM04722/BLDG F, T22CM04723/BLDG G, T22CM04724/BLDG H, T22CM04725/CLUBHOUSE/MAINTENANCE BLDGS AND 5 BBQ RAMADA'S GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Provide Structural Calculations for Foundations, Columns, Floor Framing and Roof Framing per Section 1601.1 of International Building Code 2018. 2. Provide Wind Load Calculations for the Building per Section 1609 of International Building Code 2018. 3. Provide Seismic Calculations for the Building per Section 1613 of International Building Code 2018. 4. Balcony guards are to be designed for the loads provided in IBC 2018 Section 1607.8.1. 5. Refer to Structural Drawing S2.6, Maintenance Building Foundation Plan. The Plan shows balanced Shear Walls in N/S Direction and unbalanced in E/W Direction. Verify and make revisions as needed. 6. Refer to Drawing S2.7, BBQ Ramada Framing Plan. Verify how the Structure is stabilized on two columns under vertical and lateral loadings. 7. All Calculations shall be sealed and signed by Professional Engineer registered with State of Arizona per Section 107.1 of International Building Code 2018. 8. Provide Geotechnical Report for the proposed building per International Building Code 2018, Section 1803.1. 9. The North Arrows shown on Structural Drawings does not match with North Arrows shown on Architectural Drawings. Verify and make revisions as needed. Submit a response letter addressing these correction items and provide bubbles on the revisions to the drawings. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Provide within the site plans, drawings that clearly indicate the accessible routes within the site and site arrival points that connect the accessible parking to the accessible entrances that are in accordance with Section 206.2.1 and 206.2.2 of ADAAG. 2. Provide evidence of compliance that 60% of the public entrances are accessible in accordance with Section 206.4.1 of ADAAG. 3. Provide evidence of compliance that at least one restricted entrance is accessible in accordance with Section 206.4.7 of ADAAG. 4. Provide the location of all exit signage on the egress plans in accordance with Section 1013. 5. Provide evidence of compliance of means of egress illumination in accordance with Section 1008. 6. Sheet T1: The allowable area provided for the recreation and maintenance building is incorrect. Provide a corrected allowable area for the recreation and maintenance building in accordance with Table 506.2. 7. Sheet T1: The occupant load factor used for the office and maintenance areas are incorrect. Provide a corrected occupant load. 8. Sheet T1: The occupant load for each apartment building is not provided. Provide the total occupant load for each apartment building. 9. Sheet A1.1: Ensure that the travel distance on the stairs is included in the travel distance calculations. The stairs are considered exit access and the travel distance must be included. 10. Sheet A2.1: Provide a thorough egress plan for the recreation building. 11. Sheet A3.1: Provide a thorough egress plan for the maintenance building. 12. Sheet D1: Detail 4/D1: The fire wall doesn't seem to be continuous to the underside of the roof deck in accordance with Section 706.6 Ex #4. However, detail 11/D2 indicates that the fire wall meets the continuity requirements. Provide a corrected detail indicating compliance with the continuity requirements.Denied MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. You say all ducts are below the horizontal fire rated floor/ceiling assembly, and yet you are installing a fire damper in the kitchen exhaust, why, please clarify and be clear, are all the ducts below the fire rated ceiling assembly? sheet M1.1 (IMC2018,106.3.1) 2. Is the bathroom exhaust duct below the horizontal fire rated ceiling assembly and if it is why isn't the kitchen duct below the ceiling? sheet M1.1 please be clear (IMC2018,106.3.1) ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Denied Need to provide interior lighting Comcheck for Rec Center. EP105 RECREATION CENTER ELECTRICAL PLANS POOL: Keynotes# 9 & 10 seem inappropriate for Exercise Room. EP106 EQUIPMENT ELECTRICAL PLAN: Keynote #6 appears to be a junction box and not a ground rod as per note. Keynote #10 not shown. EP401 TYPICAL UNIT 1 & 2 ELECTRICAL PLANS: Keynote #5 should state to “Provide 2 pole…” vs phase symbol. Comment applies to other EP400 sheets. EP601 PANEL SCHEDULES APARTMENT BUILDING: Panel schedules have 240/120 WYE in their Service description. The panels are 1 phase, but WYE implies that the panels are 3-phase. Correct/remove WYE. Comment applies to all 1 phase panel schedules. ES101 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN - NORTH HALF: Should call out depth of conduit runs or reference NEC depth requirements for circuits, especially where not controlled by TEP. Comment applies to other site drawings. PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied First Plumbing Review: 1). Need to address Building plan review occupant load comment #7 before a complete plumbing review can be completed. - IPC 403.1 2). Civil utility piping plan pages as shown on Plan page T1 sheet index need to be supplied to do a complete plumbing review - IPC 106.3.1 3). Landscape plan sheets as shown on plan page T1 sheet index need to be supplied to do a complete plumbing & Gas review. -IPC 106.3.1 4). plan page D1.1 BBQ Ramada plan sheet is missing. -IFGC 106.3.1 5). Drinking Fountain on plan pages P1.4 & p4.2 need to be high/low type, can't be substituted until minimum requirements have been met ( if multiple drinking fountains were required the others beyond minimum could be substituted.) -IPC 410.3 6). Maintenance Bldg. roof plan on A3.1 needs to illustrate the required secondary scuppers. -IPC 1106.5 & 1108 7). add Maintenance Bldg. scupper sizing calculations to plan page A3.1- -IPC 1101.7, 1106.1 , 1108.3 8). Add Maintenance Bldg. secondary scupper detail to plan page D4 - IPC 106.3.1 9). Add grease interceptor for kitchen sink located in assembly occupancy on plan page P1.4 -IPC 1003.1 10). Pool filler line on plan page P1.4 needs backflow protection -IPC 608.3 11). Illustrate hot & cold piping to service sink on plan page P1.4 -IPC 106.3.1 12). High/low drinking fountain on P1.4 needs a drain -IPC 301.3 13). Add gas system length & sizing table used to gas equipment load chart on plan page P1.4 -IFGC 402.4 14). Add the underground gas piping piping types or method for the gas lines to the spa, pool, bbq on plan page P1.4 -IFGC 404.11 15). Provide gas piping illustrations for the continuation of the gas lines to the spa, pool, bbq as stated on plan page P1.4 - IFGC 106.3.1 16). Add gas equipment schedule with manufacturer names & model numbers to plan page P4.2 -IFGC 301.3, 305.1 17). Add a gas piping roof attachment detail to plan page P3.1 -IFGC 404.9, 407.2 18). add piping material schedule to plan page P4.1 for gas, water, sanitary, storm -IPC 106.3.1 19). GAS BBQ ramada on plan page S2.7 appears to have overhead construction & will require a hood. -IFGC 623.5 If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/12/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 07/14/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T22CM04717, T22CM04718, T22CM04719, T22CM04720, T22CM04721, T22CM04722, T22CM04723, T22CM04724, & T22CM04725 – DP22-0105 9070 S Houghton Rd – O-3 Multi-Family (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: July 14, 2022 This site is located in O-3 Zone (UDC 4.7.15), Multi-Family use is an allowed use in the zone (UDC Table 4.8-3). 1. As DP22-0105 has not completed the first review Zoning is not able to compare the building plans to the DP. Once the 1st review of the DP is completed and comments addressed Zoning will review the building plans for compliance with the DP. Additional comments maybe forth coming. Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the DP is approved by all review agencies. 2. The address provided on the building plan application, 9070 S Houghton Rd, is not correct. Address 9070 S Houghton Rd is located in the Houghton Town Center located south of Old Vail Rd. Provide the correct address on the next submittal along with a revised application(s) with the next submittal. 3. Provide a breakdown of each unit type that clearly shows the number of bedrooms and square footage so that impact fees can be determined. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 07/14/2022 | SSHIELD1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 08/04/2022 | PSHELTO1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/19/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The DP needs to be approved before the building plans can be approved. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/19/2022 | NGARCIA3 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |