Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Permit Number - T22CM04294
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/23/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T22CM04294 2627 E Beverly Dr - R-1 Sleeping Quarters Addition (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: June 23, 2022 This site is located in the R-1 zone (UDC 4.7.8). A single-family residence is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2) subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.5 – 9. 1. Provide a residential plot plan that meets the requirements found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Residential_Plot_Plan_Requirements.pdf. a. Provide perimeter setback dimension from the proposed addition to the east property line. b. Show all utility lines on the plan. c. The east/west property dimension is not correct and should be 55’. d. Provide a dimension from the centerline of Beverly Dr to the south property line and from the face of curb to the property south property line. e. Label the zoning for all adjacent properties. 2. Show the proposed trellace on the plot plan. 3. The porch called out under Keynote 3 shows up on aerial photos some time after 2008. Zoning was not able to find approved permit documentation for this structure. Either provide copies of the approved permit documents with the next submittal or include the porch in this permit. Provide perimeter yard setback dimensions for this structure. 4. Zoning was not able to find compliance review or permit documentation for the 2 sheds called out under Key notes 1 & 2. Provide perimeter yard setback dimension for the sheds. Per UDC Article 6.6.2.D An accessory structure that exceeds the allowable height of a wall within a perimeter yard and is detached from a principal structure shall comply with the perimeter yard width standards of the principal structure, except that the accessory structure may be built to a parcel line with the consent of the adjoining or, when separated by an alley, adjacent property owner(s). To secure this neighbor setback waiver the following statement must be provided on the plot plan and be signed and dated by the adjacent property owner(s): My Name is____________________ and I am the owner of the property located at_______________________. I have reviewed the site plan and I have no objection to structure being located or constructed________ feet from the property line as depicted on the site plan. Signature: _____________________________ Date: _________________________________ 5. The proposed addition does not appear to meet perimeter yard setback. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. The minimum setback is the greater of six (6) feet, or two-thirds (2/3) the height of the structure’s wall facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A). Based on a wall height less than 9’-0” the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed addition is 6’-0”, proposed setback not provided. A Design Development Option (DDO) must be submitted and approved to reduce the required setback, DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/23/2022 | SSHIELD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/29/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM04294 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Provide a more detailed roof framing plan. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. The list of applicable codes is missing from the cover page. Provide the list of applicable and adopted codes. 2. The east wall of the addition is within 3' of the property line and is required to have a fire resistance rating of not less than 1-hour with exposure from both sides. Provide evidence that the proposed wall type meets these requirements in accordance with Section R302.1. 3. The windows in the east wall of the addition are not permitted in accordance with Section R302.1.1. 4. The roof eaves of the new roof are not permitted to project to within 2' of the property line in accordance with Section R302.1. 5. Provide a more detailed roof framing plan. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Show the location of new mechanical equipment and ductwork. ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Denied 1. An outlet is required in the bathroom and is required to be GFCI protected in accordance with Section E3901.6 and E3902.1. 2. Show the location of all required smoke and co detectors. 3. No lighting is provided in the laundry room. PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Show the location of new supply and waste lines and their connection into existing plumbing. If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/30/2022 | AWARNER1 | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved |