Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T22CM03995
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/20/2022 | PAUL CAMARENA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Paul Camarena PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T22CM03995 Addition 2127 S ROBERTO PL Zoning R-1 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 20, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1.COMMENT: For the proposed Sleeping quarters. Since this lot is located on a corner lot, the owner chooses which street lot line is the front lot line. From other than the front lot line , the street perimeter yard is ten feet. The required perimeter yard setback from the proposed sleeping quarters to the west property line is 10’-0”, proposed perimeter yard setback is 3‘7”.The minimum setback is the greater of six (6) feet, or two-thirds (2/3) the height of the structure’s wall facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A). Based on a wall height of 10’-9” the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed accessory structure to the south property line is 7’- 3”, the proposed setback is 3’-0”. A Design Development Option (DDO) will need to be processed and approved to reduce the setback. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. 2.COMMENT: For the proposed Garage. Since this lot is located on a corner lot, the owner chooses which street lot line is the front lot line . From other than the front lot line , the street perimeter yard is ten feet, the front setback is 20’. The required perimeter yard setback from the proposed garage to the north property line is 20’-0”, proposed perimeter yard setback is 10’-12 ”. The minimum setback is the greater of six (6) feet, or two-thirds (2/3) the height of the structure’s wall facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A). Based on a wall height of 10’-8” the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed garage to the east property line is 7’ 2”, the proposed setback is 4’-0”. Based on a wall height of 10’-8” the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed garage expansion to the east property line is 7’-2”, the proposed setback is 1’-6”. A Design Development Option (DDO) will need to be processed and approved to reduce the setback. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/20/2022 | KEN VAN KARSEN | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | An unvented roof assembly requires an air-impermeable rigid insulation material with a minimum R-5 value applied correctly to either side of the roof sheathing, R806.5. Show a roof design with insulation types and minimum thickness for meeting the condensation control requirement and the minimum total insulation value of R-38. Update sheet #4 & 6 for consistancy with #13 & 17. Please clarify the unvented ceiling insulation with 2018 IRC code compliance. Batt against the roof deck is not an option. Either show R-38 spray foam or a 2-layer system of a minimum of R-5 foam board (or spray) against the roof deck with R-30 batt in contact with the foam. The first method is expensive so the less costly 2-layer method is common. |