Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T22CM03994
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/07/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM03994 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Structural Calculations are not stamped and signed by the design engineer in-charge, please provide the stamped and signed document for review. 2. In the structural Calculations and in the notes on drawing S1.0, frost depth is listed at 12 inches whereas the geotechnical report requires a minimum 24 inches with a 12 inch structural fill underneath extending 5 ft on each side of the footing. 3. Drawing S1.0 lists Seismic Design Category of the structure as “B” whereas an SDC of “C” is used in the structural calculations. 4. Seems like design of concrete tilt-up walls needs to be listed as a Deferred Submittal. 5. Footing Schedule on drawing S2.0 and S2.1 lists the depth of almost all footings less than Geotech recommended minimum two-foot depth. Footing depth needs to be revised as 4,000 psf design soil capacity used in the design is based on minimum 24 inches of footing depth. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Sheet A0.0: Remove the references to the Idaho State Plumbing Code. 2. Sheet A0.0: ESFR is not a sprinkler system type. It is a sprinkler head type. Provide the sprinkler system type being used. (NFPA 13) 3. Sheet A0.0: Why are frontage increases being applied if the building qualifies for unlimited area? Provide clarification and complete frontage increase calculations. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1.Provide ventilation calculations (IMC2018,,403.3.1.1.1) to show how you are going to meet the 4% openable area to the outdoors for natural ventilation 2. Provide a detailed narrative on the process that occurs in the warehouse (e.g. what materials are you storing in the warehouse, what type of forklifts are you using in the warehouse is it fuel or electric) (imc2018,106.3.1) ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Denied There are no electrical plans included to review. The submittal set calls out the electrical as a deferred submittal. Electrical approval will be deferred until an electrical plan is submitted. If the contractor needs electrical approval before, will need to obtain approval from local AHJ. PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied First Plumbing Review: 1). Cover Sheet code summary is calling out 2017 Idaho Plumbing Code? Should be 2018 International Plumbing Code 2), Add Gutter & downspout sizing calculations to plan page A2.5 -IPC 1106.1, 1106.3, 1106.6 3). Add a Downspout grade level connection detail to plan page A2.5 - IPC 1101.6 4). No Building drain or water stub ins shown on these plans? - IPC 301.3 If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/16/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/21/2022 | IMONSHI1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Iman Monshizadeh PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T22CM03994 – Tucson Commerce Center Building Plan Review (1st Review) 3610 E Valencia Rd / I-1 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 6/21/2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1.COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the associated Development Package DP22-0100. Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the DP is approved. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the Development Package. 3. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Iman Monshizadeh at (520) 837-4082 or by email Iman.Monshizadeh@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/21/2022 | IMONSHI1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Reqs Change | Impact fees will be assessed when zoning review is complete. |
| 06/28/2022 | SSHIELD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 07/07/2022 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See building comments john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/07/2022 | VVERA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |