Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T22CM03359
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/02/2022 | CVASQUE2 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | |
| 08/10/2022 | PCAMARE1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 08/10/2022 | PCAMARE1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 08/10/2022 | PAUL CAMARENA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: Paul Camarena PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T22CM03347, T22CM03348,T22CM03349, T22CM03350, T22CM03351 T22CM03352, T22CM03353, T22CM03354, T22CM03355, T22CM03356, T22CM03357, T22CM03358, T22CM03359, T22CM03360 Building plans (2nd Review) 2885 S HOUGHTON RD Zoning SR TRANSMITTAL: August 10, 2022 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the associated unapproved Development Package DP21-0042. Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the DP is approved. 2.COMMENT: It appears that the DP and the building plan do not match, please clarify If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/13/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM03347-3360 (BLDGS 1-14) GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved NOTE: Every effort has been made to identify the code violations. Any oversight by the review team shall not be considered an authority to violate, set aside, cancel or alter applicable codes or ordinances. The plan review and permit issuance shall not be considered a warranty or guarantee. The Structural Engineer is responsible for following ALL applicable Federal, State and local Municipal Codes and Ordinances. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved 1. building 101a-105a not ready for buildout and part of this permit. Complied 2. Provide ventilation air to storage room in an approved manner sheet M201 (IMC2018,403.3.1.1). Complied 3. Provide return air to each room sheet 201 (IMC2018,403.1) Complied 4. Provide ventilation air schedule for building 1 sheet M201 (IMC2018,403.3.1.1). Complied 5. Provide 1,288 cfm of ventilation air you got 900 cfm coming in the square footage of building 4 is 21,460 square feet sheet M202 (IMC2018,403.3.1.1) Complied 6. Provide 859 cfm of ventilation air you got 600 cfm coming in the square footage of building 12 is 14,315 square feet sheet M203 (IMC2018,403.3.1.1) Complied 7. Provide a permanent means of access to equipment on building 1 & 2 where roof is above 16 feet from grade (IMC2018,306.5) Complied 8. Approved/Subject to field approval ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Conditionally Approved 2nd Electrical Response to Comments/Questions. E401 FIRST FLOOR SYSTEMS PLAN BUILDINGS 1 & 2: Should relocate pull station at break room to front door of storage office. E801 DETAILS, SCHEDULES & RISER DIAGRAMS: All of the Mini substations are called out to be 15 KVA 1 phase with 40 amp 2 pole CBs. However, ampacity for feeder tag 42C uses #2 AWG which is 100 amps of amp capacity. Not a code issue, but may want to correct for IFC. PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied Second Plumbing review: 1 thru 4 OK 5). Same- the drinking fountain chosen on P601 isn't a high/low , dual spout or have bottle filler. - IPC 410.3 6 thru 7 OK 8). SAME-Provide civil plans to show continuation of water, storm, & sanitary systems, and any onsite RV dump stations & water outlets. -IPC 106.3.1 If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/15/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | All portions of each new building regardless of size shall be within 400' of a hydrant as the hose lays and or fire sprinklers shall be installed. Questions Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 |
| 08/30/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The current plan set contains no civil drawings to show the installation of water service to the building and nothing to show that the water meter for the building has adequate capacity for the proposed water demand. A development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). Include the appropriate civil drawings with the current plan set or apply for a separate permit for the site utilities. [Initial comment: Show the location of the proposed water meter, backflow preventer, and the water service pipe on a site plan. Provide the size of the water meter serving this building, the size of the backflow preventer associated with the water meter, and the total water demand served by the water meter. Reference: Section 107.2.1 and 107.2.6, IBC 2018.] |