Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T22CM03354
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/03/2022 | VFLORES1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | PLEASE CONTACT PC ADDRESSING BUILDING NUMBER NEEDS TO BE ASSIGNED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE Ph# 520-724-9512, EMAIL:ADDRESSING@PIMA.GOV |
| 05/18/2022 | PAUL CAMARENA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: Paul Camarena PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T22CM03347, T22CM03348,T22CM03349, T22CM03350, T22CM03351 T22CM03352, T22CM03353, T22CM03354, T22CM03355, T22CM03356, T22CM03357, T22CM03358, T22CM03359, T22CM03360 Building plans (1st Review) 2885 S HOUGHTON RD Zoning SR TRANSMITTAL: May 18, 2022 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the associated unapproved Development Package DP21-0042. Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the DP is approved. 2.COMMENT: It appears that the DP and the building plan do not match, please clarify If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/18/2022 | PCAMARE1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 05/19/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM03354/BLDG #8, T22CM03348/BLDG #2, T22CM03349/BLDG #3, T22CM03350/BLDG #4, T22CM03351/BLDG #5, T22CM03352/BLDG #6, T22CM03353/BLDG #7, T22CM03347/BLDG #1, T22CM03355/BLDG #9, T22CM03356/BLDG #10, T22CM03357/BLDG #11, T22CM03358/BLDG #12, T22CM03359/BLDG #13, T22CM03360/BLDG #14, GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. The Structural Calculations submitted references International Building Code 2012 on pages 20 of 29 to 25 of 29. The City of Tucson, AZ is on IBC 2018. Revise the Calculations and resubmit BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Sheet G001: The allowable and actual height and areas provided do not match Table 506.2. Provide a breakdown of each building's allowable and height and area. 2. Sheet G001: The statement regarding the separation of occupancies does not occur in this project. No R-3 occupancies occur. Remove or correct the statement. 3. Sheet G001: The statement regarding 1/2 hour fire walls is not correct and does not occur in this project. Remove this incorrect statement. 4. Sheet G001: The occupant load factor used for office is incorrect. Provide a corrected occupant load calculation for each building in accordance with Table 1004.5. 5. Sheet G001: It's unclear if sprinkler systems will be required. Provide a area breakdown for each building in accordance with previous comments. 6. Sheet G001: The exit access travel distance is stated as 250', however, there is no indication that any of the buildings are sprinklered. Therefore, exit access travel distance would be 200'. Provide clarification and correction in accordance with Table 1017.2. 7. Sheet G001: The allowable and actual number of stories states that there are two stories. However, none of plans indicate two stories is present on any of the building. Provide clarification or provide the missing floor plans. 8. Sheet G002: The occupant load calculations provided on the life safety plan is incorrect. Provide a corrected occupant load calculation in accordance with Table 1004.5. 9. Sheet G002: No egress illumination provided on the egress plan. Provide the location of all egress illumination on the egress plans in accordance with Section 1008. 10. Sheet G002: Provide clarification as to why buildings #1 and #2 are considered separate buildings and not one. Is this one building with separated occupancies in accordance with Section 508? Additional clarification required. If two buildings are desired; then a fire wall complying with Section 706 would be required. 11. Sheet G003: No egress illumination provided on the egress plan. Provide the location of all egress illumination on the egress plans in accordance with Section 1008. 12. Sheet A002: The north walls of buildings #3 and #5 are required to have a minimum fire resistance rating. No wall tags have been provided for these walls in correlation to the wall types found on Sheet A021. Provide correctly labeled walls with the required fire resistance rating in accordance with Table 602. 13. Sheet A002: The east walls of buildings #3 and the west wall of building #5 are required to have a minimum fire resistance rating. No wall tags have been provided for these walls in correlation to the wall types found on Sheet A021. Provide correctly labeled walls with the required fire resistance rating in accordance with Table 602. 14. Sheet A201: Some walls are missing wall tags. Provided correctly labeled wall tags for all walls present. 15. Sheet A202: Some walls are missing wall tags. Provided correctly labeled wall tags for all walls present. 16. Sheet A203: Some walls are missing wall tags. Provided correctly labeled wall tags for all walls present. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Provide plans for mechanical equipment for the 5 retail spaces showing ductwork and all other pertinent information. this is not a core and shell, it's a complete build out sheet M201 (IMC2018,106.3.1) 2. Provide ventilation air to storage room in an approved manner sheet M201 (IMC2018,403.3.1.1) 3. Provide return air to each room sheet 201 (IMC2018,403.1) 4. Provide ventilation air schedule for building 1 sheet M201 (IMC2018,403.3.1.1) 5. Provide 1,288 cfm of ventilation air you got 900 cfm coming in the square footage of building 4 is 21,460 square feet sheet M202 (IMC2018,403.3.1.1) 6. Provide 859 cfm of ventilation air you got 600 cfm coming in the square footage of building 12 is 14,315 square feet sheet M203 (IMC2018,403.3.1.1) 7. Provide a permanent means of access to equipment on building 1 & 2 where roof is above 16 feet from grade (IMC2018,306.5) ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Denied Need to provide interior lighting Comchecks for buildings with lighting. Need to provide site lighting calculation per Tucson requirements. E201 FIRST FLOOR POWER PLAN BUILDINGS 1 AND 2: Should provide a service receptacle in each Retail/Office space. E207 FIRST FLOOR POWER PLAN BUILDINGS 9, 10 AND 11: Keynote #2 not used. E301 FIRST FLOOR LIGHTING PLAN BUILDINGS 1 AND 2: Other codes may require that you install some lighting, emergency lighting, and a receptacle in the Retail/Office areas as a Core and Shell type design. E401 FIRST FLOOR SYSTEMS PLAN BUILDINGS 1 & 2: Need pull station at egress of storage office. Need to confirm Retail/Office areas will be sprinklered or provide smoke detectors in each. Should provide a horn and strobe in each Retail/Office area. E403 FISRT FLOOR SYSTEMS PLAN BUILDING 4: Need pull stations at each egress. E801 DETAILS, SCHEDULES & RISER DIAGRAMS: All of the Mini substations are called out to be 15 KVA 1 phase. The primary should be furnished with 40 amp minimum CBs to avoid nuisance trips. Or your design could be for 5 KVA transformers (CAD error), which make the 20 amp selection correct. Coordinate design issue to correct for one or the other. Panel schedules imply 5 KVA for mini subpanel. E902 SCHEDULES: All of the secondary 20A mini subpanels (20 amp is on the primary) could have 30 amp (or larger) MCBs per NEC. Should attempt to balance loads on LB4. E903 SCHEDULES: All of the secondary 20A mini subpanels (20 amp is on the primary) could have 30 amp (or larger) MCBs per NEC. PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied First Plumbing review: 1). Plumbing plan P200 doesn't correlate with floor Plan page A201, show all plumbing fixtures & sanitary/venting piping illustrations. -IPC 106.3.1 2). illustrate water piping to all fixtures on plan page P201 to correlate with fixtures shown on A201 floor plan. -IPC 106.3.1 3). Plan page P201 shows 3" vent that doesn't Correlate with plan page P200 shows 1.25" vent.. -IPC 106.3.1 4). plan page P601 fixture schedule missing breakroom sink information, break room sink is shown on floor plan A201. -IPC 106.3.1 5). This facility requires a service sink & high low drinking fountain- -IPC 403.1 Update all affected pages. 6). Add storm conductor sizing calculations to plan page P201. -IPC 1106.2 7). Add the types of piping materials to be used to plan page P601. -A106.3.1 8). Provide civil plans to show continuation of water, storm, & sanitary systems, and any onsite RV dump stations & water outlets. -IPC 106.3.1 If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/25/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Show the location of the proposed water meter, backflow preventer, and the water service pipe on a site plan. Provide the size of the water meter serving this building, the size of the backflow preventer associated with the water meter, and the total water demand served by the water meter. Reference: Section 107.2.1 and 107.2.6, IBC 2018. |
| 06/09/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Sheet G001: The allowable and actual height and areas provided do not match Table 506.2. Provide a breakdown of each building's allowable and height and area. Sheet G001: The statement regarding 1/2 hour fire walls is not correct and does not occur in this project. Remove this incorrect statement. Sheet G001: The occupant load factor used for office is incorrect. Provide a corrected occupant load calculation for each building in accordance with Table 1004.5. Sheet G001: It's unclear if sprinkler systems will be required. Provide a area breakdown for each building in accordance with previous comments. Sheet G001: The exit access travel distance is stated as 250', however, there is no indication that any of the buildings are sprinklered. Therefore, exit access travel distance would be 200'. Provide clarification and correction in accordance with Table 1017.2. Sheet G001: The allowable and actual number of stories states that there are two stories. However, none of plans indicate two stories is present on any of the building. Provide clarification or provide the missing floor plans. Sheet G002: The occupant load calculations provided on the life safety plan is incorrect. Provide a corrected occupant load calculation in accordance with Table 1004.5. Sheet G002: No egress illumination provided on the egress plan. Provide the location of all egress illumination on the egress plans in accordance with Section 1008. Sheet G002: Provide clarification as to why buildings #1 and #2 are considered separate buildings and not one. Is this one building with separated occupancies in accordance with Section 508? Additional clarification required. If two buildings are desired; then a fire wall complying with Section 706 would be required. Provide detail of the elevators and the codes that they will comply with Provide a list of separate permits required: Fire sprinkler underground Fire sprinkler plans Fire alarm plans Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033Fire Plans Examiner |
| 06/21/2022 | SSHIELD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/21/2022 | VVERA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |