Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T22CM03107
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/30/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM03107 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved Approved with the following conditions: 1. Revised footing size needs to be incorporated in the foundation plan and footings to be built to the revised size. 2. Geotech engineer's input regarding ground water loads wasn't provided with the response as is indicated in the structural response letter. From the calculations it is clear that ground water pressure is not a design issue for this project, please ensure that a response from the geotech engineer regarding ground water pressures being a non-issue is obtained and on the file before work is allowed to commence. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. duct that penetrates more than 2 stories shall be protected with a shaft enclosure sheet M1.0 (IMC2018,607.6.1) Not Complied this is a mechanical code requirement not a IBC code section requirement, it shall not be chase wall, it is required to be protected by a shaft according to the mechanical code. And this is considered a duct not a vent pipe, so it is required to be in a shaft and furthermore you will need to penetrate the shaft according to section 607.5.5 exception 2 of the IMC 2018 for r-2 occupancy there is no chase recognized in the IBC, the 6" range exhaust duct's must be in a 1 hour shaft and properly fire stopped at the shaft, and must be noted as such Not Complied (MMC2018,607.6) 2. Ducts penetrating shaft walls shall be protected with fire and smoke dampers sheet M1.0 (IMC2018,607.5.5) Not Complied the section you are quoting is for fire partition walls, not shaft walls, which are made of fire barrier walls, you are quoting a different section then what was written, So ducts that penetrate shaft walls shall be protected with fire and smoke dampers. Complied3. All range exhaust duct's in all apartment unit's shall be in a shaft where duct penetrates fire rated floor/roof ceiling assembly sheet M1.0 (IMC2018,607.6.2) Not Complied same as correction #1 5. All ceiling FCU installed in the fire rated floor/ceiling assembly shall be protected in an approved manner sheet M1.0 (IMC2018,607.6.2) Not Complied I did not see a detail for the fan coil installation, in relation to the fire rated ceiling assembly please provide a detail for that. Complied 6. Ceiling diffuser's that penetrate fire rated floor ceiling assembly's shall be protected in an approved manner on all floors sheet M1.0 (IMC2018,607.6.2) Not Complied All ceiling mounted bathroom exhaust fans penetrating fire rated ceiling assembly as shown on detail 104 on sheet M2.0 shall be protected with a ceiling radiation damper sheet M1.0 (IMC2018,607.6.2) Complied 7. Indicate where the trash discharge room is, your only indicating trash rooms, the trash discharge room must be a 1 hour rated room that the trash discharges in sheet M1.0 (IMC2018,106.3.1) & (IBC2018,713.13.4). Not Complied. Provide a fire damper where the exhaust duct penetrates the trash discharge room on the 1st floor sheet M1.0 according to IBC2018, section 713.13.4,and provide ceiling radiation dampers where the exhaust duct penetrates the chute access rooms at the ceiling fire rated assembly per IMC2018,607.6.2 on sheet M1.1 you must provide the ceiling radiation damper at the ceiling penetration of trash chute access rooms, you provided a fire and smoke damper at the wall penetration. but i will accept the fire and smoke damper at the trash discharge room Not Complied 8. Provide make up air for the the exhaust in all the trash chute access rooms on M1.1 (IMC2018501.4) Complied 10.Provide the VRV Xpress, piping layout with the refrigerant capacity for the condenser unit and the piping refrigerant. sheet M3.0 (IMC2018,106.3.1) Not Complied the diagram does not provide the 1.refrigerant capacity in the condensing unit 2. the extra refrigerant for the piping and 3. it does not provide the length in piping from the condensing unit to all the air handlers. the manufacturers piping layout is required not the riser drawn by the engineer Complied 11. Provide a separate duct for the outdoor air coming out of the shaft on each floor, instead of the main 12 by 10 that feeds the corridor and apartment units, and protect with a fire and smoke damper or else you will have to provide a smoke damper at each corridor penetration (MMC2018,607.5.4) ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Approved PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved 1 thru 4 OK 5). OK grease interceptor omit letter included in submittal -community kitchen on plan pages P1.0, P1.2 has a cooking appliance community sink & will not need to discharge thru an grease interceptor. ** See attached letter from waste water authority in submittal** -IPC 1003.1 6). OK- The updated 1st floor outlet drain sanitary piping coming from lint interceptor on plan page P1.3 will need to tie in downstream of the toilet that is adjacent to the 1st floor laundry room. 7 thru 9 OK If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/08/2022 | SSHIELD1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 09/08/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Sheet A11.0 is the stairwell section and shall show the required standpipes located on the main landings. Show that the elevator shaft beam meets the requirements for OSHA and weight on the Structural Drawings. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Tucson Fire Department Fire Plans Examiner Fire Inspector I, II and Fire Alarm Plans Examiner Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov Desk: 520-837-7033 |
| 09/08/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T22CM03107 – DP22-0123 1346 N Stone Ave Multi-Family (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL: September 8, 2022 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in the OCR-1 zone (UDC 4.7.26). Multi-Family is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-4). 1. Zoning as reviewed the building plans for compliance with DP22-0123 and until the DP has been approved Zoning cannot approve the building plans. 2. The building plans show pop outs and balconies along the north side of the building that are not shown on the DP and may affect perimeter yard setbacks. Coordinate with the Civil Engineer and ensure that these features are clearly shown on the DP. 3. Any DP sheets provided in the building plan set need to be the approved stamped development package sheets. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 09/08/2022 | SHASEMA1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |