Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T22CM03107
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/18/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide a separate sheet showing that the buildings meet the requirements of IFC 2018, Appendix D, Sections D105.1-D105.4 and make a note of the areas provided and also a note stating that these areas shall never have awnings, large trees and or other obstructions put in place. Plans shall show that the elevator is compliant with 2018 IBC, Chapter 30 with the interior communication as well. Sheet A11.0 is the stairwell section and shall show the required standpipes located on the main landings. Buildings with a Standpipe system shall have a fire hydrant within 100' of the F.D.C. Building does require a fire alarm it however, does not require a Voice/Evac. If you would like to install a Voice Evac than please leave that note. If you would like to provide just an Occupant Notification System per NFPA 72 and local amendments for smokes than please adjust your drawings. Add a note to the drawings: Building shall be tested for Emergency Responder Radio Coverage by PCWIN and a report provided to TFD. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 Fire Plans Examiner |
| 07/19/2022 | SSHIELD1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 07/21/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T22CM03107 – DP22-0123 1346 N Stone Ave Multi-Family (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL: July 19, 2022 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in the OCR-1 zone (UDC 4.7.26). Multi-Family is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-4). 1. As DP22-0123 has not completed the first review Zoning is not able to compare the building plans to the DP. Once the 1st review of the DP is completed and comments addressed Zoning will review the building plans for compliance with the DP. Additional comments maybe forth coming. Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the DP is approved by all review agencies. 2. Any DP sheets provided in the building plan set need to be the approved stamped development package sheets. 3. For the purpose of determining impact fees provide a breakdown of the number of each type unit and the square footage. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nocholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 08/01/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM03107 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved Approved with the following conditions: 1. Revised footing size needs to be incorporated in the foundation plan and footings to be built to the revised size. 2. Geotech engineer's input regarding ground water loads wasn't provided with the response as is indicated in the structural response letter. From the calculations it is clear that ground water pressure is not a design issue for this project, please ensure that a response from the geotech engineer regarding ground water pressures being a non-issue is obtained and on the file before work is allowed to commence BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. duct that penetrates more than 2 stories shall be protected with a shaft enclosure sheet M1.0 (IMC2018,607.6.1) Not Complied this is a mechanical code requirement not a IBC code section requirement, it shall not be chase wall, it is required to be protected by a shaft according to the mechanical code. And this is considered a duct not a vent pipe, so it is required to be in a shaft and furthermore you will need to penetrate the shaft according to section 607.5.5 exception 2 of the IMC 2018 for r-2 occupancy 2. Ducts penetrating shaft walls shall be protected with fire and smoke dampers sheet M1.0 (IMC2018,607.5.5) Not Complied the section you are quoting is for fire partition walls, not shaft walls, which are made of fire barrier walls, you are quoting a different section then what was written, So ducts that penetrate shaft walls shall be protected with fire and smoke dampers. 3. All range exhaust duct's in all apartment unit's shall be in a shaft where duct penetrates fire rated floor/roof ceiling assembly sheet M1.0 (IMC2018,607.6.2) Not Complied same as correction #1 4. Provide return air to corridor's on all floors sheet M1.0 (IMC2018,403.1) Complied 5. All ceiling FCU installed in the fire rated floor/ceiling assembly shall be protected in an approved manner sheet M1.0 (IMC2018,607.6.2) Not Complied I did not see a detail for the fan coil installation, in relation to the fire rated ceiling assembly please provide a detail for that. 6. Ceiling diffuser's that penetrate fire rated floor ceiling assembly's shall be protected in an approved manner on all floors sheet M1.0 (IMC2018,607.6.2) Not Complied All ceiling mounted bathroom exhaust fans penetrating fire rated ceiling assembly as shown on detail 104 on sheet M2.0 shall be protected with a ceiling radiation damper sheet M1.0 (IMC2018,607.6.2) 7. Indicate where the trash discharge room is, your only indicating trash rooms, the trash discharge room must be a 1 hour rated room that the trash discharges in sheet M1.0 (IMC2018,106.3.1) & (IBC2018,713.13.4). Not Complied. Provide a fire damper where the exhaust duct penetrates the trash discharge room on the 1st floor sheet M1.0 according to IBC2018, section 713.13.4,and provide ceiling radiation dampers where the exhaust duct penetrates the chute access rooms at the ceiling fire rated assembly per IMC2018,607.6.2 on sheet M1.1 8. Provide make up air for the the exhaust in all the trash chute access rooms on M1.1 (IMC2018501.4) Not Complied 9. Mechanical systems shall not be located in an elevator shaft sheet M1.2 (IMC2018,303.8) Complied OK per the city TUCSON building department 10.Provide the VRV Xpress, piping layout with the refrigerant capacity for the condenser unit and the piping refrigerant. sheet M3.0 (IMC2018,106.3.1) Not Complied the diagram does not provide the 1.refrigerant capacity in the condensing unit 2. the extra refrigerant for the piping and 3. it does not provide the length in piping from the condensing unit to all the air handlers. the manufacturers piping layout is required not the riser drawn by the engineer ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Approved PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied Second Plumbing Review: 1 thru 4 OK 5). SAME -community kitchen on plan pages P1.0, P1.2 has a cooking appliance community sink will need to discharge thru an grease interceptor. -IPC 1003.1 ** provide approval letter from waste water authority as stated in response comments** 6). A-add the lint interceptor(s) to the plumbing piping floor plans & P1.3 riser diagram to show location(s), piping & venting configurations -IPC 106.3.1, , 1003.6, 1003.9 B- The washers on P1.3 sanitary riser diagram can't connect to double sanitary tee. -IPC 706.3 7 thru 9 OK If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/10/2022 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The Development Package must be approved first. Ensure roof drainage is not directed over pedestrian circulation. Loren Makus loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |